xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Neither was I, until it became obvious that the National League is the onlyPoor frail pitchers. Hopefully they can still spit and chew tobacky. Never been a fan of the DH.
Scott Boras coming off as a greedy a hole.
https://sports.yahoo.com/agent-scott-boras-lays-one-140600422.html
Scott Boras coming off as a greedy a hole.
https://sports.yahoo.com/agent-scott-boras-lays-one-140600422.html
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Poor baby. But $4 million would be worth it?
I hope you don't go to grocery stores, where people have to deal with REAL risks for $12/hour.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
It's actually an infurating amount of greed. If they don't play this year I will likely tune out baseball next year
Poor baby. But $4 million would be worth it?
I hope you don't go to grocery stores, where people have to deal with REAL risks for $12/hour.
Snell is not very articulate, and obviously tone deaf, but the issue isn’t whether he takes money from working class folks. It’s whether he takes more money from plutocratic owners. It’s a classic big business trope to pit workers against less well off workers as opposed to their shared enemy: the ownership class.
I don’t support Snell’s message, and he’s obviously selfish, but I prefer he and all players (that actually assume the risk of contracting the illness by playing) receive their maximum salary as opposed to the owners hoarding it under the pretenses of castigating the players as greedy while they watch from their well-appointed owner’s box.
There is risk on both sides. The owners have the risk of litigation with anyone involved in the production of these games including the players.
a 50/50 split was a good offer.
Going to 45/55 is the death kneel to any public support for the players. Or leave it at 50/50 but offer to pay the salary of any person who worked for the organization and now cannot for the entire year.
There is risk on both sides. The owners have the risk of litigation with anyone involved in the production of these games including the players.
a 50/50 split was a good offer.
Going to 45/55 is the death kneel to any public support for the players. Or leave it at 50/50 but offer to pay the salary of any person who worked for the organization and now cannot for the entire year.
My point of view is that the players being asked to risk their health (or lives) because we all wish things
were back to normal after a couple of months . . .
. . . is no different than I, as a senior citizen who they say is more at risk, considering the same when it
comes to trying to resume a normal life.
And active athletes would face a greater risk of being exposed to the germ on a daily basis than I.The biggest difference being, of course, that you risking your health trying to resume your normal life benefits a much smaller circle of people than the MLB players’ doing so.
https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/...ays-theres-a-lot-of-reward-with-minimal-risk/Will Yankees or Mets play games in New York? Governor Cuomo says there's 'a lot of reward with minimal risk'
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo believes there's value in having a baseball season
AP Exclusive: MLB projects $640K per game loss with no fans
https://sports.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-mlb-projects-640k-per-game-loss-185002978--mlb.htmlNEW YORK (AP) -- Major League Baseball told players their prorated salaries would contribute to an average loss of $640,000 for each game over an 82-game season in empty ballparks, according to a presentation from the commissioner’s office to the union that was obtained by The Associated Press.
Painting a picture of a $10 billion industry shuttered by the contagion, the 12-page document titled “Economics of Playing Without Fans in Attendance” and dated May 12 was an initial step in negotiations aimed at starting the delayed season around the Fourth of July.
Teams say the proposed method of salvaging a season delayed by the coronavirus pandemic would still cause a $4 billion loss and would give major league players 89% of revenue.