Kyler Murray Debate Thread

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
29,150
Reaction score
42,885
Location
Colorado
This is the greatest conjecture ever. You have no idea about this on any level.
I mean...the McVay / KOC offense is based on getting the ball out quickly and taking shots down the field. There isn't a huge check down element to it. A lot of layered route concepts to the middle of the field. Not a ton of moving out of the pocket which makes it different than the Shanahan system. None of that is really Kyler's strong suit.

McVay ditched Goff for Stafford because Goff wasn't taking enough shot throws. Kyler doesn't really do that.

KOC asks Darnold to stand in the pocket and take shots to deliver the ball. Kyler isn't built to do that.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,413
Reaction score
8,540
Location
Scottsdale
An interesting thought experiment might be... How many games did we lose this season where a very credible argument could be made that we legitimately should've won?
Our first 2 losses were against the Bills and then the Lions. Two extremely good teams that, as we stand here today could likely be playing in the Super Bowl. But we lost both of those games by a single TD. Our 3rd loss was the blow-out to the Commanders, a team led by a rookie QB.
Our 4th loss was another blow out, this time to the Packers.
We go on to lose to the Seahawks in a low-scoring, 10-point loss... The Vikings in a game we 100% should've won. The Hawks again, this time in a blow out at home. The Panthers in a game with so much riding on the outcome, yet we suffer the most deflating loss of the season. Finally, with nothing to play for we lose to the Rams in a game many would say we had a tremendous chance to win...

Question: How many other QB's would've found a way to win at least 3 of the games we lost? In other words, if Kyler wasn't our QB, how many other QB's out there would've taken this team to the post season this year? We could never really know of course...but, I think it's safe to say that Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, Daniels & Stafford would have our Cards playing in January this season. But, would guys like Goff, Hurts, Stroud, Mayfield, Herbert, Darnold, Love Purdy, Geno Smith and Tua been able to lead this team into the post season this year? Would Caleb Williams, Russ or Bryce Young done more with this team this season than Kyler?

Just trying to further assess where Kyler truly stands in comparison to other QB's...
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,356
I mean...I guess.

Obviously the best answer is a better QB with a better roster.

The alternatives are a better roster with the same QB OR the same roster with a better QB. If the player cycle doesn't offer you the opportunity of a better QB, then you just build the roster.

Yeah I don't see why the concept of building a better roster is bad to him? The only "con" to it is if you believe it's going to make it harder for you to draft high enough to get a QB but I'm not into that reason.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,356
A quick fact check.

Minnesota does not have the best offensive personnel in football.

Kyler is not a good fit in the McVay/KOC scheme so he would not be the MVP.

The reason Darnold won't get a contract from Minnesota is because JJ McCarthy beat him out for the starting job and will be back from injury.

They're in the top 5 I would argue, Detroit led the league in scoring I think they run the ball better than Minnesota.

There's a lot of reasons I wouldn't want to give Darnold a big contract but one of the most obvious is how outlier of a season this was. Not just from him. said before, Minnesota was 8-1 in games decided by a TD or less this year, that's WAY outside the norm.

This was one of those seasons where virtually everything went right for them so to still get routed in their last 2 games has to really hurt.
 

football karma

Michael snuggles the cap space
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Posts
15,395
Reaction score
14,621
How many games did we lose this season where a very credible argument could be made that we legitimately should've won?
they were 3-5 in one score / coin flip games. their 8-9 might have been a 9-8

their record represents who they were
 

602 Native

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Nov 1, 2023
Posts
2,563
Reaction score
4,962
Location
Gilbert
Philly
Detroit
Baltimore w/ Flowers

Cincy is better
SF healthy is better

Miami is close. Minnesota has the better offensive tackles.
Jets are close.

Jefferson, Addison, Jones, and Hockenson
Philly maybe
Detroit not even close

Baltimore (this is funny because people were just saying this group is not elite) but is definitely arguable

Cincy not close
SF they are never healthy so no

Miami no (Waddle really has regressed and Hill is being a turd)
Jets LOL
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
88,550
Reaction score
40,356
Jefferson, Addison, Jones, and Hockenson
Philly maybe
Detroit not even close

Baltimore (this is funny because people were just saying this group is not elite) but is definitely arguable

Cincy not close
SF they are never healthy so no

Miami no (Waddle really has regressed and Hill is being a turd)
Jets LOL

I would say Philly. Best OL in the league, if not the best I don't know who's better. 2000 yard rb, two WR's that are WR1 good. 2 good TE's. Said it the other day put Josh Allen on Philly they're probably unbeaten.

I'm going to predict if Philly doesn't win the SB this year we start to see fans clamoring for a new QB
 

GeorgiaCard88

Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2023
Posts
467
Reaction score
1,253
Location
Georgia
An interesting thought experiment might be... How many games did we lose this season where a very credible argument could be made that we legitimately should've won?
Our first 2 losses were against the Bills and then the Lions. Two extremely good teams that, as we stand here today could likely be playing in the Super Bowl. But we lost both of those games by a single TD. Our 3rd loss was the blow-out to the Commanders, a team led by a rookie QB.
Our 4th loss was another blow out, this time to the Packers.
We go on to lose to the Seahawks in a low-scoring, 10-point loss... The Vikings in a game we 100% should've won. The Hawks again, this time in a blow out at home. The Panthers in a game with so much riding on the outcome, yet we suffer the most deflating loss of the season. Finally, with nothing to play for we lose to the Rams in a game many would say we had a tremendous chance to win...

Question: How many other QB's would've found a way to win at least 3 of the games we lost? In other words, if Kyler wasn't our QB, how many other QB's out there would've taken this team to the post season this year? We could never really know of course...but, I think it's safe to say that Mahomes, Allen, Jackson, Daniels & Stafford would have our Cards playing in January this season. But, would guys like Goff, Hurts, Stroud, Mayfield, Herbert, Darnold, Love Purdy, Geno Smith and Tua been able to lead this team into the post season this year? Would Caleb Williams, Russ or Bryce Young done more with this team this season than Kyler?

Just trying to further assess where Kyler truly stands in comparison to other QB's...
I’d say everyone in that first tier, everyone in that second tier (except maybe geno ironically considering Kyler got beat by him twice)- so maybe 13-14 of them? I’d argue that bo nix and Prescott (when healthy) could do it too. Probably close to 15-16
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,459
Reaction score
15,819
Location
Charlotte
That makes no sense, we didn't have a first round draft pick QB that beat out Kyler for the job before getting hurt about to return.

If they didn't have McCarthy, they'd give Darnold a huge contract. They do, so they won't.

Makes sense.

They sort of have the formula they want going into next year right now:

JJ McCarthy competing with veteran back-up Daniel Jones.
 
Top