- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
- Posts
- 11,660
- Reaction score
- 844
And then he was there when traded Perkins for the said Jeff Green.He was there when they drafted Jeff Green and then traded him for Ray Allen. :championship:
And then he was there when traded Perkins for the said Jeff Green.He was there when they drafted Jeff Green and then traded him for Ray Allen. :championship:
http://espn.go.com/boston/nba/story...radley-becoming-one-most-feared-defenders-nba
If not the best, Bradley is easily a top 5 perimeter defender in the NBA right now.
because his GM says so there must be truth to it. Zeller must truly be the best shooter in the world then!
Precisely. I think fans tend to focus so much on the draft because the rewards are potentially much higher than in free agency (unless you're Miami) or trades (unless you're the Lakers). But you have to be prepared to utilize all methods of acquiring talent, because you never know when an opportunity to sign or trade for a major piece might turn up.It's true, it is more than just the draft, it's how players are traded and free agents signed. No matter how one gets a key player it takes someone to recognize the talent and help make the moves to get these players. It's a combination of all three aspects of acquiring players. Seattle/ OKC drafting players like Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook early in the draft makes things a lot easier.
All this complaining and/or praising of past drafts means nothing at this point.
I only care about this qualification:
He's not Lance Blanks.
I just watched the teleconference with new Suns General Manager Ryan McDonough at azcentral. See link below.
I must say I like what he said a lot, especially that he wanted the Suns top scouts to know all potential NBA talent and be able to compare and evaluate players together in real time... not just specialize in a given area like college scouting. For example he wants his scouts to know players wherever they might be, whether it be international, the NBADL, the draft, free agents and other NBA players so whoever becomes available the Suns can compare the talent.
I was impressed by this strategy.
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/sun...h-excited-for-opportunity.html?nclick_check=1
Apparently Sarver went on the radio after the press conference yesterday and admitted that he made some bad moves because he didn't know what the hell he was doing. Said he has learned a lot and is trusting McDonough and Babby to pretty much run the ship.
More importantly Sarver finally admitted that the top teams in the NBA are build around draft picks and usually high draft picks.
~I thought last year they did research showing that rebuilding through the draft is not working...
OKC is the one example of a team that was built through the draft and one has to admit they have done a masterful job using their picks. But if Portland had chosen Durant instead of Oden, they wouldn't be in this discussion.
San Antonio is the team that has used its own draft picks to the best advantage and to do that they drafted David Robinson when he was facing two years of active military duty, tanked shamelessly to draft Duncan and then scoured Europe when few others did to get Parker and Manu.
No one complained louder than I did when the Suns were raffling off their draft picks and I also complained that they were ruining their scouting organization in doing it because it had so little function for those years. Not that the guys we'd have gotten would likely have made us a contender, but we wasted much time and effort bringing players there was no hope of building around. And you have to admit we've drafted like crap ever since then.
It would be folly to disagree that the draft is lifeblood of the league since 99% of the players in it were drafted but sitting back and building with the picks that fall to you is not a great method. The Lakers and Celtics are the teams that have a long history of being top teams and they've done it primarily by acquiring picks and players from other teams. What they are good at is recognizing talent and using every method possible to get it. The Lakers did single out Kobe before anyone else and they traded Divac to another team to have them draft him for them. Shaq and Gasol they acquired via other means.
I gotta disagree... we could have had Deng or (more likely had we kept the pick) Iguodala in the 04 draft. Obviously Rondo... would have been nice to have. The one of the picks we gave away in the KT trade turned into Serge Ibaka. We also gave away Nate Robinson (though I did despise him as a college player). When Golden State screwed us in the Curry draft by reneging on the Amare/Curry swap it screwed us two-fold. The Suns wanted a PG for the future, if they'd known that Golden State was flaking on the agreed upon trade they supposedly would have taken Jrue Holiday instead of Earl Clark.
But giving away a pick that would have been Iguodala for basically nothing is what really hurts in retrospect. He would have been absurd in the SSOL system. They could have coped with Johnson's injury and potential departure far better. They could have been more proactive about trading Marion because they had a replacement already. Having Iggy here would have made them significantly better and given his defensive prowess and the Suns lack of it... I think he could have swung a few series in our favor.
Of course we did screw up in that deal with Chicago that netted them Deng but that was not one of the picks we sold or traded away for financial reasons - we were assuming that Iggy wouldn't be available at #7 and also assuming that Chicago's pick the next year (which we did acquire in the trade) would be better. The first assumption seemed somewhat reasonable at the time though it was silly not to hold off making the trade until it was an established fact. The second assumption was totally unwarrented as Chi finished the season strong (compared to the way they started it) and they'd be strengthened by two high picks(their own pick was #3) for the next year. [They improved dramatically so we got #21 from them, setting off the Nate Robinson + QRich for Kurt Thomas deal.]
Yep. The problem was not cheapness, it was arrogance. They tried to get too cute. It is much better to play much more sure odds. Wait, make sure, take the best player available. It is much more dangerous to trade back or out of a draft than to stand pat or trade up to get the player you want.
That's why the idea of trading out of this draft in favor of 2014 is fraught with danger. Too many things can happen. Draft sure, draft solid.
The Suns slow played their poker hand and it backfired on them.
I am sure McD is not going to approach the draft that way. Ainge was his mentor. I can still hear Ainge shouting over the boos at the draft party that Nash was the "safe" pick
I cannot see him trying to get too cute, or really reaching for a questionable player. Boston has made a habit of just letting the draft fall and taking advantage of other people's mistakes.
But we'll see.
Yep. And MickyD also said Ainge is aggressive and he likes to follow that model. It works well in poker too.