sdscard4
ASFN Lifer
If the NBA let Seattle move to OKC of all places we shouldn't think it can't happen to us. Losing the Suns is something that doesn't even seem real. It's our original franchise....first born
3rd best winning % in nba history.From 1969 to 2010 we were what 5th in Wins?
I've reached the point where I want the city council to vote down the restoration and Sarver to move the team. They are NEVER going to get better under his ownership, so they might as well move the team and probably get an expansion team with an owner who actually is smart enough to spend money on basketball people who know what they're doing.
The Suns/Sarver don't own the arena. They pay rent to play there. The city cares about the product (or should?) due to economic and civic value. And if that value diminishes below some threshold, then the city shouldn't care if the Suns leave or not. But managing a building that cannot be filled because the Suns are not there would also be a problem for the city. The city cares less about wins or losses than you or I do. I doubt that the Suns are embarrassing to them.yes, but this is not only his "home" or his product. it is also the NBA's product and the city's/community's product
especially when the taxpayers subsidize the arena
i'm not saying we can change anything
but we can surely have our say
I was just at the arena the other night and it seemed like a perfectly normal, functional facility to me. No flaws were visible at all.
Now if there are somehow tremendous internal problems with the plumbing or electrical setup. or the A/C, it didn't seem that way.
Do we really need 'super wide' concourses as a matter of team function?
There was literally nothing wrong with the place. It's a big concrete block, how bad could it be? Especially after the fancy enclosed front facade
went on 15 years ago. Are the luxury boxes not luxurious enough? Is the Keurig broken?
Nah. Suns move, I am done with the NBA.Start watching other teams. Pick another
PR nightmare? I think you are overvaluing the importance of the Phoenix Suns to the NBA landscape. You act as if this is the Lakers, Bulls, or Knicks. Its the Suns. The team with zero rings. They mean a lot to old time Phoenix residents but not to the average NBA fan, or even the transplant Arizona NBA fan. It especially doesn't matter to NBA owners who know they will make a killing in Las Vegas and Seattle.
Sarver killing the trade for SGA absolutely supports that theory and is probably exactly what happened.
Can't get on board with this unfortunately. It would take Arizona looooong time to get another franchise.
That said I almost hope the vote fails and Sarver unsuccessfully tries to move the Suns. It might be the one thing that finally makes him sell the team, take his money, and go away.
Sure you risk losing the franchise. But nothing will improve until Sarver is gone or he somehow gets an epiphany and let's someone experienced take control of the basketball side.
I haven't said this here yet, but my adult children have no real interest in the team. That is because during their formative teen years the team has been a laughingstock. An entire generation of fans has been lost.
I would love to see that breakdown, because I’m inclined to be sure the other way. Or rather, sure that the cost to the city might be reimbursed over time, but the city won’t be a profit partner or share in the valuation of the franchise.
There aren’t THAT many other events at the arena, eapecially in peak tourist season during the NBA schedule. Forbes values the Suns at almost 1.3 billion. Why can’t the Suns finance it over time rather than the city? Rhetorical question, honestly. I just find it absurd how we’ve subsidized these things.
Nash did not like Sarver during his prime
https://arizona.sbnation.com/phoeni...-nash-robert-sarver-phoenix-suns-bill-simmons
He only liked Sarver towards the end of his career and because he allowed him to go to the Lakers to be closer with his family or whatever.
Which is why I am hoping that Jerry will get involved behind the scenes, if he isn't already, especially since Sarver was his legacy.
Even if it is a negotiating tactic, it is sacrilegious for him to make moving the Suns an issue, especially naming specific cities.
Except the arena had renovations done just 15 years ago
http://www.nba.com/suns/news/azcentral_031027.html
So no, it hasn’t been 25 years.
How would you know? You've never been to any games.The Suns arena is the most outdated in the league
ouchie and I have talked and wondered about this and I asked a couple of my life-long die-hard fellow friends who still live in the valley if their kids like the Suns... they both said they didn't give one stinking crap about the team.
How would you know? You've never been to any games.
I was just at the arena the other night and it seemed like a perfectly normal, functional facility to me. No flaws were visible at all.
Now if there are somehow tremendous internal problems with the plumbing or electrical setup. or the A/C, it didn't seem that way.
Do we really need 'super wide' concourses as a matter of team function?
There was literally nothing wrong with the place. It's a big concrete block, how bad could it be? Especially after the fancy enclosed front facade
went on 15 years ago. Are the luxury boxes not luxurious enough? Is the Keurig broken?
I was just at the arena the other night and it seemed like a perfectly normal, functional facility to me. No flaws were visible at all.
Now if there are somehow tremendous internal problems with the plumbing or electrical setup. or the A/C, it didn't seem that way.
Do we really need 'super wide' concourses as a matter of team function?
There was literally nothing wrong with the place. It's a big concrete block, how bad could it be? Especially after the fancy enclosed front facade
went on 15 years ago. Are the luxury boxes not luxurious enough? Is the Keurig broken?