Seahags Monday Morning QB

CardShark

DEAL WITH IT!
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Posts
2,584
Reaction score
0
Location
Florence, Arizona
MMQB: Cardinals 27, Seahawks 21

By Kyle Rota
Seahawks.NET
Posted Dec 11, 2006

Note to all Seattle Seahawk football fans: The sky has not fallen, we didn’t give up a top 10 draft choice for Deion Branch, Holmgren didn’t suddenly become the worst coach in football history, Josh Brown is still a minor deity, suicide is bad, and Seattle still has a very strong grip on the NFC West. Yes, Seattle lost to the Arizona Cardinals, and that sucks.

Yes, this team is not playing as well as last year. This is not a bad football team. It is a wildly inconsistent football team, but there is talent there. Lower your expectations and realize that Seattle may not be a special team, but they’re a good team.
Arizona Cardinals 27, Seattle Seahawks 21
December 10th, 2006
University of Phoenix Stadium, Glendale, Arizona

Play of the Game: On 4th and 20 with less than a minute remaining, QB Matt Hasselbeck completed a 19.5 yard pass to WR Deion Branch, just shy of the first down marker. After that play, the game was over. It also serves as a perfect description of Seattle’s performance in the desert – just barely short. There is one question that needs to be asked – why did Branch (not a strong YAC guy) run a pattern that left him shy of the first down marker?

Bringing Their “A” Game: WR DJ Hackett had another great game – 4 receptions for 104 yards and a score… WR/PR Nate Burleson continues to perform well on special teams and even caught a touchdown pass… P Ryan Plackemeier continues to boom punts all over the field… and… that’s it. We did lose to the Arizona Cardinals.

The Bad and The Ugly: This was the second worst performance I’ve seen from this team this year, behind only the drubbing the team endured at Chicago… The defensive line played awful, getting little pressure, few hits, and no sacks on a rookie QB behind Arizona’s porous offensive line… Arizona’s running game – previously an oxymoron – had a strong performance against Seattle, even on situations where it was painfully obvious a run was coming… Seattle fumbled the ball four times, which made the difference in the game… Run blocking was suspect at best for Seattle’s offensive line… Defensive Coordinator John Marshall has a lot of explaining to do for a very vanilla game-plan…

Referee Report Card: Arizona got away with murder when it came to holding – especially on the defensive ends, who were often held right in front of the official. Otherwise, it was a very solidly officiated game. Early on the laundry was flying everywhere, but in the second half the officials showed unexpected restraint. Overall, a B+.

Offense: If the offense manages to hang onto the football, the Seahawk fanbase is taken off of suicide watch, and Seattle looks like a strong contender for a first round bye. Hasselbeck, Alexander, FB Mack Strong, and WR Darrell Jackson all had fumbles, and they were all critical – three were recovered by the Cardinals, and Jackson’s negated a first down gain. It is just so ironic that when Hasselbeck finally stops throwing the interceptions, the offense lays an egg with four fumbles.

Speaking of Mack Strong, does anybody doubt this is his last year? He is one of the most beloved Seahawks, everybody appreciates his work ethic, and he was a very good blocker for many years, but this season has just been awful. He has been removed from pass-blocking duties because he hasn’t done a good job against the pass rush, he has struggled run blocking, and he has become unreliable with the ball in his hands… At this point, he has very little going for him. It has been a great career, and Seattle should name a street after him, but 2007 will be time to turn the reigns over to Leonard Weaver, or someone else.

Even if Strong were blocking at 2005 levels, Shaun Alexander simply isn’t as good as he was last year. Yes, the offensive line really struggled today and has been inconsistent all year, but this Alexander lacks the burst of last year. A slower Alexander is not the entire problem. Alexander is also running much less decisively than last year – last year he would hit a hole, and then look to cut back. This year, he’s is waiting for the offensive line to create something, but this line isn’t able to create anything. It really is a lost year for Alexander, compared to his previous greatness.

Mike Holmgren is responsible for a lot of the offensive woes. It is not his fault that the offense fumbled the ball four times, but it really felt like Seattle could’ve hurt Arizona much more than they did, even with the fumbles. Where are the short passes and slants that have defined the Seahawk offense this century? Whatever happened to the bootlegs that Seattle used to great effect last year? More than the West Coast Offense staples, where is the tempo? Holmgren has always established a positive tempo on offense, but this year the team has never felt in sync. That, more than anything else, will determine how far the team goes in the playoffs.

There is one player able to rise above any and all challenges. His name is D.J. Hackett, and he is extraordinary. Hackett has a nose for the first down marker, and he can make tough catches in traffic. He is also the perfect deep-threat for Matt Hasselbeck. Oh yeah – he catches almost anything he can get his hands on. Hackett had another great game, catching four passes for 104 yards and a touchdown. How does Hackett get more involved in the passing game? With Burleson looking resurgent, Branch getting more comfortable, and Jackson leading the league in touchdown receptions, it is difficult to find a spot for Hackett, but Seattle needs to make a point of designing a few plays around his abilities.

Defense: The score is ugly – 27 points scored against the defense. There are two sides to this problem. On one hand, the defense didn’t perform very well. In fact, nobody on the defense played very well. However, they were put in a really bad position by an offense that could not hold onto the ball. The touchdown reception by Cardinals WR Bryant Johnson was all on the defense – mainly CB Marcus Trufant and SS Jordan Babineaux. Babineaux lagged 10 yards behind the play, and Trufant picked a bad time to slip – but the rest of the points allowed were all tied to an offense unable to secure the ball.

The offense cannot be held responsible for the defense line, however. On running plays, Seattle was simply overpowered. A good defensive line will keep the offensive line off the linebackers, but Seattle’s linebackers had a blocker in their face on almost every play. Seattle allowed 113 yards on the ground, a bad if not tragic number, but when a defense allows the Arizona Cardinals to run for 113 yards, there is an issue with the run defense. Simply put, a defensive unit this good last year, should not be this bad this year.

The inability of the defensive line to eat up blockers has also contributed immensely to the poor tackling seen this season. Because the defensive line is beaten one-on-one, at least one linesmen – and usually a fullback or TE as well – are able to get the second level, neutralizing the undersized Seahawk linebackers. If the linebackers try to run around the blocker, they inevitably get a really poor angle on the ball carrier and often miss the tackle. The blame does not solely lie with the linebackers; it also lies with the defensive line for forcing the linebackers to take poor angles. (Jordan Babineaux, on the other hand, just can’t tackle)

The defensive line was equally awful against the pass. Some of this is doubtlessly the fault of defensive coordinator John Marshall, but there is no excuse for not sacking Matt Leinart at least a few times. It really felt like even when we brought pressure, Leinart did not have to rush his throws. For the second straight game, Seattle didn’t capitalize on a chance to pound a rookie quarterback. The line looks tired and worn out, and has been dominated on many, many occasions.

The single most frustrating aspect of this defense is their inability to make adjustments. For example, look at Arizona’s ability to throw slant patterns against Seattle’s corners. The slant route terrorized Seattle, helping the Cardinals pick up key first downs. While the slant route is a great route for picking up short yardage, making a couple simple adjustments in the defensive scheme can lead to interceptions. Of course, the defense didn’t make any adjustments. The blame lies with Defensive Coordinator John Marshall, who is watching his defense crumble around him. Seattle is running almost the exact same defense as last year, yet somehow a top 10 defense last year isn’t even top 20 this year. Marshall doesn’t have the creativity to take advantage of versatile players like Julian Peterson while keeping the rest of the team disciplined.

Special Teams: The coverage team was lacking against Arizona, but even their performance was merely ordinary. K Josh Brown didn’t get any field goal attempts, but he made two extra points much closer than they should have been. P Ryan Plackemeier did an excellent job punting the ball, as usual. Nate Burleson continues to be stunning on punt and kick returns, and it would surprise nobody in Seattle if he took another return for a touchdown – though Mike Holmgren’s blood pressure shoots up every time he forgets to fair-catch the ball, and gets drilled immediately.

Summary: These Seahawks are lacking in the magic that the Seahawks had in their 2005 super-bowl run. However, this is still a good football team, just one that is not clicking on offense and performing poorly on defense. The Seahawks host the 49ers on December 14th, with a chance to wrap up the division and secure themselves a playoff berth.

This team isn’t done yet.
 

azwulf

TD Cardinals
Joined
Dec 13, 2002
Posts
172
Reaction score
0
Location
Germany
MMQB: Cardinals 27, Seahawks 21

By Kyle Rota
Seahawks.NET
Posted Dec 11, 2006



Referee Report Card: Arizona got away with murder when it came to holding – especially on the defensive ends, who were often held right in front of the official. Otherwise, it was a very solidly officiated game....


Any comment on this from the people who actually have seen the game???
 

Brighteyes

Super Bowl!
Joined
Aug 13, 2002
Posts
962
Reaction score
81
Location
Portland Oregon these days.
Any comment on this from the people who actually have seen the game???

ON the officiating -- I can't EVER recall an official watching the monitor on a challenge for a four minutes, then running over to the coach to ask WHAT he was challenging.

In view of how short he looked at the monitor the second time, it seemed like he'd already decided to give the ball to Seattle. He just couldn't remember why.
 

SpokaneCardfan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Posts
1,323
Reaction score
507
Location
Spokane
ON the officiating -- I can't EVER recall an official watching the monitor on a challenge for a four minutes, then running over to the coach to ask WHAT he was challenging.

In view of how short he looked at the monitor the second time, it seemed like he'd already decided to give the ball to Seattle. He just couldn't remember why.
Funny who the article failed to complain about the worst call in the game. According to that article Arizona didn't win that game Seattle lost it. What a bunch of garbage.
 

seesred

Registered User
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
5,364
Reaction score
28
Location
section 8 row 10
Cards holding on every play ? Try Hawks get breaks on phantom calls on our Wide Recievers. I guess we will not get any respect till we earn it, I'm okay with that. But Homgreen should watch some tape. If he did he would find are O-line has been pretty darn good the last four weeks.

GBR
40
 

dreamcastrocks

Chopped Liver Moderator
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2005
Posts
46,417
Reaction score
12,154
I almost threw something at my TV on that interception call. I don't know how in the world that even with instant replay, the Cards get SOOOO many calls to go against them. The personal foul for example. Yes, "they always see the second guy happened" and I can agree with that. He did deserve a personal foul. What about the 3rd guy that came in and completely tackled the guy and was completely unnecessary. No call for him.

It truly amazes me week after week with the officiating against the Cards. I should come to expect it by now, but I don't.

Back to the main point, this was a well-written article. A well thoughtout article that missed a couple of points, but got the big picture well.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,607
Location
Generational
I could be wrong, but I think he doesn't understand what an oxymoron is.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
14,036
Reaction score
7,070
Location
Goodyear
Go to the Hags message board and it's a total meltdown. Where's MigratingOsprey?

i've been around - check the game thread, roof thread and predictions thread

i thought it was a very poorly officaited game - but poor in all aspects - i could point out many phantom calls against the seahawks or missed calls on plays that could of been important, however I won't because it really doesn't matter - the officiating in this league is poor, i don't 100% believe it is biased, just incompetant

I had a great weekend - i was feeling sick most of the week and not close to 100% for all the festivities, but it was great seeing all my fellow seahawk fans out saturday night as we took over the fox & hound in peoria - was also some good tailgating, even getting to see Mr. & Mrs Seahawk again (who I hadn't seen in 4 years) - the tailgating was pretty good (although I showed late)

my section was pretty good, there was 1 meathead hawks fan sitting next to one meathead cards fan - after bickering all game they realized they were the same person with just different shirts and starting drunk humping each other

some idiotic comments, but that's to be expected - all in all people were just happy and I can't fault anyone for that

as for the game - the hawks could of / should of - but didn't - that has been part of their makeup this year

they are making mistakes, turnovers, penalties that they weren't doing this year - they have 3 games to get it cleaned up - they have the ability to do it, now it's just a matter if they can't get it done

games in this league turn on such few plays that you can't take a holding call to start the game, leading the passing situation that led to the fumble that led to the TD - you can't turn the ball over that much, you can't fumble away first downs - especially on the road

with all that said it was a good win by the cards, a bad loss by the hawks - but even with all that said and done the hawks will still win their 3rd straight divisional title, still host a playoff game and still be in the mix this post season despite all the mistakes, injuries, turnovers, missed opportunities and in the end I really can't complain about that

I had a good weekend and as a hawks fan I know that once again the party isn't going to stop after the 16th game - maybe after the 17th game - but that is a long way off
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2002
Posts
13,305
Reaction score
1,185
Location
SE Valley
i thought it was a very poorly officaited game - but poor in all aspects - i could point out many phantom calls against the seahawks or missed calls on plays that could of been important, however I won't because it really doesn't matter - the officiating in this league is poor, i don't 100% believe it is biased, just incompetant
The officials sucked!!! A team has got to be good enough to beat the other team and the bad calls... Yesterday, Arizona was.


my section was pretty good, there was 1 meathead hawks fan sitting next to one meathead cards fan - after bickering all game they realized they were the same person with just different shirts and starting drunk humping each other!
:biglaugh: That's a great line!

It's good having you as a regular on the board MO! :thumbup:
 

Dback Jon

Doing it My Way
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
83,980
Reaction score
44,242
Location
South Scottsdale
Seattle paper guy complaining about the officiating? :biglaugh: Seattle didn't get their first penalty UNTIL THE FOURTH QUARTER, and got FOUR first downs on penalties, not to mention a phantom interception.

Assclowns indeed.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,607
Location
Generational
Seattle paper guy complaining about the officiating? :biglaugh: Seattle didn't get their first penalty UNTIL THE FOURTH QUARTER, and got FOUR first downs on penalties, not to mention a phantom interception.

Assclowns indeed.

These are the Seahawks right? This is what "they" do when beaten. Remember the Super Bowl.
 
Top