just read we re-inked Alameda.....so we have a big body in the middle.....
Not sure how anyone can question Dansby's intangibles when he was consistently was named Captain of the Defense and was the on field play caller. Dude, just put $ in the offseason above everything else, but on the field and in the locker room during the season, not sure you could ask for a much better guy.
And how did K9 show Witherspoon was just as good in coverage as Los? He isn't near the playmaker at that level, which K9 backed up with stats.
Not sure how anyone can question Dansby's intangibles when he was consistently was named Captain of the Defense and was the on field play caller. Dude, just put $ in the offseason above everything else, but on the field and in the locker room during the season, not sure you could ask for a much better guy.
And how did K9 show Witherspoon was just as good in coverage as Los? He isn't near the playmaker at that level, which K9 backed up with stats.
Go look at the apples to apples comparison. Weatherspoon had better numbers at same point in career with 8 passes defensed rather then 5. Los is a better playmaker that I agree with. Im only using the info given to me.
I dont think Dansby is nearly the leaders you guys do but I digress. Dont feel like he helped younger players, chased money over winning TWICE, and was a lazy fool here in Miami. I just dont think being named a captain automatically means you have great intangibles but this is a fool hardy exercise. I have my opinion and the majority has theres. No love lost for Karlos over here.
But you're ignoring the info that Los had 3 INTs to 0 for Weatherspoon at that point which basically means he had the same amount of defended passes AND converted 3 of them into turnovers which are even more important.
Thought I remember an Urban article when Los left talking about how Los took a lot Of the young guys under his wing and was a teacher for a lot of them in te locker room.
Who cares why argue…. Spoon is a fantastic player! Get Washington back and our LBing corps is back to a strength IMO…
Go look at the apples to apples comparison. Weatherspoon had better numbers at same point in career with 8 passes defensed rather then 5. Los is a better playmaker that I agree with. Im only using the info given to me.
Thought I remember an Urban article when Los left talking about how Los took a lot Of the young guys under his wing and was a teacher for a lot of them in te locker room.
Los was a huge leader here, both stints.
los had less pass defenses but more picks and touchdowns...
Thought I remember an Urban article when Los left talking about how Los took a lot Of the young guys under his wing and was a teacher for a lot of them in te locker room.
Maybe. Heres article on Spoon that is from 2 days ago.
http://espn.go.com/blog/atlanta-fal...falcons-brace-for-sean-weatherspoons-depature
Definite strength of his.
Why are we even discussing Karlos? He gone baby. We dont get to choose between the two. Long live SPoon!
Who cares why argue…. Spoon is a fantastic player! Get Washington back and our LBing corps is back to a strength IMO…
********.
Meh… Im with AZ on this one HUGE leader is a bit of a stretch...
Kevin Minter specifically said that Dansby texted him after he signed with Cleveland to wish him the best of luck. Said that Dansby was a constant teacher who taught him now to be a pro.
Too bad that kid's bad at football.
Because YOU brought his name up in the discussion, ********.
ESPN article above:
He let me use his hyperbaric chamber at his house.
Necessary???
I don't know. I don't think that it's necessary to drop someone's name, be called out on inaccuracy, then retreat into "Well, I'm biased against this guy, and why are we talking about him anyway?"
I actually drew a similar comparison on a different thread saying that if we close this deal, it's as good as when we brought Dansby in. But you can't drop some nonsense, get called out on it, and then openly wonder why people are talking about someone else.
I don't know. I don't think that it's necessary to drop someone's name, be called out on inaccuracy, then retreat into "Well, I'm biased against this guy, and why are we talking about him anyway?"
I actually drew a similar comparison on a different thread saying that if we close this deal, it's as good as when we brought Dansby in. But you can't drop some nonsense, get called out on it, and then openly wonder why people are talking about someone else.
maybe they are buddies outside of ASFN and he had a vasectomy so k9 has always called him ******** since then.
I can confirm none of the above is true