At this point with this roster I say
7-10
7-10
At this point with this roster I say
7-10
Meh. 5 game span is no different than saying they’ll be anywhere between 5-12 or 9-8 - there’s a world of difference in a 5 game span.I've been a fan of this team long enough to know that this guesswork and hope is better than most of the guesswork and hope we've seen in the past.
Remember when the Cardinals tried to sell us on Tony McCoy as a big acquisition? Jason McAddley and Bryan Gilmore at WR? This isn't that.
The reason I won't pin down an exact prediction for the season is because of all of these variables. I think the offense is probably good enough on its own to hover plus or minus .500 (9-8 or 8-9). As much as Vance pisses me off on the micro calls, his overall body of work is pretty impressive. I think he can coach this defense to a league average ranking.
And Vance has a knack for scheming sacks in his defense, so I think he'll get some pass rush.
Except that happened in season. We didn’t go into the season based on guesswork and hope. We got lucky. So what you’re saying is you think we will get lucky. Meh.Not any more guesswork or hope than would’ve been required the last time we were without Jones and the pass rush improved…
Id say there is a better plan in place THIS year than that season. When Jones went down, most thought that the pass rush was toast. Reddick was his replacement and he had sucked as an edge player in the past.Except that happened in season. We didn’t go into the season based on guesswork and hope. We got lucky. So what you’re saying is you think we will get lucky. Meh.
That's about what I expect as well.9 wins
So you think we would do worse with more time to prepare?Except that happened in season. We didn’t go into the season based on guesswork and hope. We got lucky. So what you’re saying is you think we will get lucky. Meh.
You don't start 7-0 and it's fools gold. That's ridiculous.I still have them at 5 wins give or take 1. Last year's 11 wins was fools gold. I have zero confidence in the D holding up and one or two key injuries on it will mean that Kyler has to score every possession.
They were playing above their level in some of those games and got a bunch of lucky breaks. They shouldn't have been 2-0 never mind 7-0. What we saw in the last 10 games of the season is closer to who they were then what they did the first 7 IMO. It was a fun ride to start the season though.You don't start 7-0 and it's fools gold. That's ridiculous.
#birdcityfeverThey were playing above their level in some of those games and got a bunch of lucky breaks. They shouldn't have been 2-0 never mind 7-0. What we saw in the last 10 games of the season is closer to who they were then what they did the first 7 IMO. It was a fun ride to start the season though.
what is week one for if you aint hoping you win it all this seasonLet’s be honest with our schedule a winning season would be great period. I still want to be optimistic and think things will go better than expected and we win double digits and go playoffs again. And hopefully actually show up for the game…!
Id say that Harlow showed he could play in stretches and while Ford has been bad for stretches, he's likely better than Max Garcia was last year.I said 8 to 11 wins I'm lowering that 7 to 10 with Hamilton out and the situation with Hudson and Pugh. I also think McBride's back injury and him not looking sharp in the preseason is a big problem I think without D Hop it's likely we will want to play more 2 TE sets and run the ball but that is way more effective if both of those TE's are threats in the passing game too so we'd need McBride to get sharp fast
Do you get paid every time you say #birdcity lol#birdcityfever
So that chip shot FG the Vikings kicker missed, that could have changed the course of the early season, was skill on our part?You don't start 7-0 and it's fools gold. That's ridiculous.
Part of the game. The Cardinals blew numerous plays throughout that game. I remember thinking (in a drunken haze) as the Vikings lined up to kick that FG about how many opportunities the Cardinals blew in the game.So that chip shot FG the Vikings kicker missed, that could have changed the course of the early season, was skill on our part?
So you're proving the point that being 7-0 didn't make the team totally fine and that 7-0 didn't make them flawless. Good.Part of the game. The Cardinals blew numerous plays throughout that game. I remember thinking (in a drunken haze) as the Vikings lined up to kick that FG about how many opportunities the Cardinals blew in the game.
Anyone who ever points out one play as the loser is missing the point.
Now go look up total pressures and tackles for loss. He killed it that year. Sacks aren’t the only barometer. Which he followed up with another double digit sack season in Carolina with lots of pressure and tackles for loss. He was good. Trying to discount what he brought is a little silly.Let’s not forget Reddick had 5 sacks in one game vs one of it not the worse Oline in the league in NYG (btw Gardek had 2 in that game). So he had 7.5 sacks in the other 15 games. Solid but def wasn’t a world beater demanding double teams.
It’s maybe just me but the 7-0 run was legit. Only two of those games were decided by a TD or less. We were dominating people.So you're proving the point that being 7-0 didn't make the team totally fine and that 7-0 didn't make them flawless. Good.