Lex said:
Kerouac-
No, I'm not stoned.
That 3-1 record as a starter last year illustrates my point. 3-4 wins a year won't cut it in the NFL, he had THREE wins last year.
In those 5 games he appeared in last year, he ranked 50th among quarterbacks in passer rating. He also ranked 50th in completion percentage.
FIFTY-ITH. NUMBER 50. The big FIVE O. (there are only 32 teams right?)
Does a great arm and quick release do you any good if your accuracy is 50th among quarterbacks in the NFL?
I will agree with you on one point. Michael Vick WILL re-define the quarterback position in the NFL. Never again will an NFL franchise try to make a quarterback out of a wide receiver.
Lex - I seem to remember someone blasting people when they sued a certain statistic to gauge how good a QB was - I think that person was defending a certain QB who played for the Cards years back - don't you think if you make an argument one way, you should probably stick to that argument.
Oh and considering that Pennington in his second season as a starter was out for half the season, does that too mean he's not a good QB - I mean, Vick didn't even get hit while running downfield - he was trying to avoid a SACK - you know - a play that happens in the backfield?
Vick is absolute stud who single-handedly carried that Falcons squad to the playoffs AND won a game there - where no one else EVER had. Does that not make him a winner - or the fact that he took a Va Tech team, that no one saw coming and brought them to the National Title game and again, almost signlehandedly kept them in that game? I mean, if anything up to this point - your boy Jake Plummer's career is almost a mirror image of Vick's - Both of them brought their respective teams to the brink of National Titles - establishing themselves as winners at the collegiate level. They both then went on to take their team to the playoffs in their second years - and win a road playoff game where NO ONE gave them any hope. In their second seasons as starters, both suffered injuries - from playing in the pocket - Plummer's finger, Vick's broken leg - and both had pretty horrendous passer ratings - although Vick did come back once fully healthy as to not hurt the team - even when Plummer refused to come out of games - thus hurting our team.
Are yous aying that Vick doesn't have that intangible that Plummer does - being a winner and leader as QB of the team? Are you saying that Plummer wasn't injury prone his third year in the league, just as Vick was last year and that both weren't hurt while in the backfield, rather than downfield, where most people expected their injuries to come from? And are disputing that there have been a decent of amount of running QBs who have matured over their years to be better passers over the course of their careers (Steve Young, John Elway, hell, even Mark Brunell and Jake Plummer - or Randall Cunningham)?
I just don't understand your animosity against a physical freak of nature who has won EVERYWHERE he's gone and electrified the league and college in doing so.