GatorAZ
feed hopkins
Top 10 safety last year who turned 31 years old today still without a job. It's come to the point where he'd have to sign for the minimum. Any chance we could bring him back to mentor Badger for a year on the cheap?
Any chance we could bring him back to mentor Badger for a year on the cheap?
We could use a good vet at safety, Rhodes isn't a bad option.
Yes sir! The one and only. Went to camp today with mike ,nice new ops.
According to Bickley and Marotta on 620 KTAR, it is because of his perceived sexual orientation.
They spent a good half-hour on this yesterday.
Linky - scroll to the 23:30 time and listen.
According to Bickley and Marotta on 620 KTAR, it is because of his perceived sexual orientation.
They spent a good half-hour on this yesterday.
Linky - scroll to the 23:30 time and listen.
did they present facts to reinforce that slander of the NFL??...or was it just their opinion??
What other mitigating factors make sense to you then? Slander? I think not.
That older veterans are simply not attracting much attention as free agents this year unless they want to sign one year deals on the cheap and Rhodes won't play for that maybe? There are several players still looking for work who have been very productive in the NFL in past years.
What other mitigating factors make sense to you then? Slander? I think not.
What other mitigating factors make sense to you then? Slander? I think not.
Or maybe he's just not as good as perceived by many on here. He's good enough to be on a team, and even a serviceable starter, but why not get a younger,cheaper player who will have just as much an impact as Rhodes will?According to Bickley and Marotta on 620 KTAR, it is because of his perceived sexual orientation.
They spent a good half-hour on this yesterday.
Linky - scroll to the 23:30 time and listen.
Who else is out there?
Or maybe he's just not as good as perceived by many on here. He's good enough to be on a team, and even a serviceable starter, but why not get a younger,cheaper player who will have just as much an impact as Rhodes will?
He's kind of in limbo. He's a backup on a good team and not worth the money for a bad team.
Michael Turner RB, Cedric Benson RB, Barrett Ruud LB, Cedric Griffin CB, Sheldon Brown CB, Nate Clements CB, Abram Elam FS, Tanard Jackson FS, Sherrod Martin FS, Eric Smith FS, Quintin Mikell SS....
Don't know if these guys are any good now or have any injury or personality problems but they all were productive in the NFL and are still free agents.
Or maybe he's just not as good as perceived by many on here. He's good enough to be on a team, and even a serviceable starter, but why not get a younger,cheaper player who will have just as much an impact as Rhodes will?
He's kind of in limbo. He's a backup on a good team and not worth the money for a bad team.
Just based off cursory glance you listed two running backs who a) are 97 years old in running back years and b) played like dog crap last year. Sheldon brown and Clements who are 33 and 34 and have seen major drop off in their games...Barrett Rudd who's never been impressive at any level, Tanard Jackson who has been suspended TWICE for banned substances...and apparently isn't even eligible for league reinstatement until the end if the month. And Cedric Griffin who has also been banned for substances and I think recently got a DUI. And Elam is both older, not as productive and got benched after like 10 games last season.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Rhodes isn't in the same age, red flag for substances category as the guys you listed AND played very well last season.
This is a joke. The guy has been a playmaker for the last five seasons...but he's only good enough to be a back up on a good team? He was basically the second best player/leader of a top 10 defense last year.
Just because you're still butt hurt we let Rolle go doesn't mean Rhodes wasn't a very good ball player for us.
What other mitigating factors make sense to you then? Slander? I think not.