Also it is ppossible to get as high as a 3rd for compensatory if im not mistaken.
Remeber everyone, the cardinals shopped Big around last season to see his value and if there were any takers. This also could have led to the decision of letting him walk.
I just dont believe anyone was gonna tade anything worth while for that big overrated hunk of lard. Besides if hes the HUGE FA you guys are making him out to be we will likely get a decent compensatory pick(4th round) anywhoo. So big wooptydoo!
Also it is ppossible to get as high as a 3rd for compensatory if im not mistaken.
History does bear with me... The only other player to get the franchise value via the 20% rule the first time franchised is Woodson. He signed, because the one year base for very close to the value of a long term deal signing bonus.Nor is it nearly as simple as you try to make it out to be. From the way you talk, he'll sign the franchise tender as soon as he sees the paperwork. History does not bear you out, nor does common sense. Only one player has ever gyped his team the way you describe--Woodson. Also, if he really wants to leave and has the chance to leave AND get more money, he'll more than likely jump on it. Is that water tight? Is there the chance he stays for one year? Sure, but it's pretty safe that it's a small chance, and we can easily cover it and keep a pretty good player. Not a bad risk-reward ratio.
So, you're afraid that since there is a risk he'll sign the tender, we shouldn't try it, right? Tell me, is the risk we'll end up with no solid replacement and with no compensation not far greater than the consequences of the risk of him signing the one year tender? I'm pretty confident in my logic, bro.
History does bear with me... The only other player to get the franchise value via the 20% rule is Woodson..
Should have pointed out that I meant the first time he got tagged.There are others. Walter Jones did it twice I believe, just as an example.
2) Graves concluding that Big backed by his $11.4M salary in bargaining power in a long term negotiation wouldn't get much more 4th rounder if traded.
The risk was bigger than the reward, and they let him test the market.
I just want to take this opportunity to apologize for all of the mean and hurtfull things that I have said about BIG in the past. It is not his fault that we picked him and we cant blame him for not telling anyone that he was a lazy unmotivated guy. When money is in your face, anyone would say that they are worthy of being an early draft choice. With that said, GOOD RIDDANCE YOU FAT, LAZY, WORTHLESS, WIMPY, CRYBABY, NON-BLOCKING, ASSIGNMENT MISSING, FALSE STARTING AND SOON TO BE SOMEBODY ELSE'S PROBLEM. Best of luck bud (except when you play the Redbirds).
For your first, you are wrong that you think people wouldn't trade for the big overrated hunk of lard, because he happens to be one of the jewels of the FA market, according to a lot of experts. Teams likely find him the same.
Also, remember that we will not likely get a compensatory pick for him. Please remember that we need to spend a gazillion dollars somehow in FA, and if we bring in more FA than we lose, we don't get squat in FA.
Finally, you have said earlier on this thread that you would have rescinded the tag if you found out you couldn't trade him. Well, guess what? Thanks to a move you so loudly support, we'll never have the chance to get something. Sound smart to you? Not to me.
Sad to see posts like this all over the board. Whether Davis was a good or bad offensive lineman for the Cards is debateable but to see the hate here for a guy who played for the Cardinals for 6 years, 5 of them under horrible conditions, and never complained, never acted like he was too good for the team, and did good things like donate his time to charities in the Phoenix area just makes me sick.
Leonard as a person is a far cry from Simeon Rice or David Boston and doesn't deserve the kind of crap posted by cardsfanmd... and others for that matter.
I agree to call him "WORTHLESS, WHIMPY, and a CRYBABY are all out of line. The rest fits him to a tee.
That's too bad. I expected more from you Shane.
You and I agreed a long time ago that Davis inconsitency as a result of an apparent lack of focus was hurting the offense.
That doesn't mean we have to gin up rude behavior.
Where's Woodrow Call when I need him?
Duck, why don't just just post over and over again 'Bidwill is cheap' and have done with it
So you think that slamming Davis simply because the Cardinals are not going to keep him for next year is acceptable behavior?
Do you really believe that Davis was lazy, and gave a half hearted effort, and didn't want to be in Arizona? If so where are your facts to back it up?
You are such a hypocrite.
So you think that slamming Davis simply because the Cardinals are not going to keep him for next year is acceptable behavior?
Do you really believe that Davis was lazy, and gave a half hearted effort, and didn't want to be in Arizona? If so where are your facts to back it up?
You are such a hypocrite.
I definitely believe he was lazy at times thus he gave a half hearted effort many times on the field. Watching him play confirms that for me. He was entirely to inconsistent. He showed at other times how dominant he could be. So what was happening in between the dominance and the medocrity? IMO opinion its a lack of focus and effort. Which to me means he wasnt will9ing to give it his all on every single play. Supposting the lazy comments.
This is a moot point anymore. The man is moving on and i believe it is time for us to move on.
I definitely believe he was lazy at times thus he gave a half hearted effort many times on the field. Watching him play confirms that for me. He was entirely to inconsistent. He showed at other times how dominant he could be. So what was happening in between the dominance and the medocrity? IMO opinion its a lack of focus and effort. Which to me means he wasnt will9ing to give it his all on every single play. Supposting the lazy comments.
This is a moot point anymore. The man is moving on and i believe it is time for us to move on.