regardless, every business attempts to recoup overhead costs. if they sell a product it's built into the sale price. why should it be any different for a law firm or any other professional services organization?
i thought was not going to comment on it again but do you think that "non-chargable hours" will be completly absorbed by a firm or allocated back to paying clients...i am sure you have an idea what the firm you were with did with those hours and maybe they ate them...but i doubt it....THIS TIME no more from me on the subject..my point is yes, by the way, the costs incurred to sue the cardinals is being allocated over their client base....of course that is opinion only.[/QUOTE]
i know i'm going to get a lot of rolling eyes on this one but . . .
if they are ethical attorneys they will eat those costs or allocate them to "goodwill" (a portion of which can be tax write-offs - remember, the tickets themselves are partially write-offable-yes i made that word up-so it's possible they can formulate an argument that the law suit falls into that expense category also).
what you are talking about is called "padding" and it is illegal. do some attorneys do it? of course. but i'll bet you can find an equal percentage of people in other industries breaking the law also. and when an attorney's padding is discovered they are disbarred and usually jailed. padding is not very prevalent. at least, not in the more reputable firms. too many of you have seen too many movies like "the firm" and believe that all attorneys are out to take your money. what no one realizes is that without litigious individuals who are trying to take each others' money there would be a lot less attorneys in the world.