But Jack Burton did almost the exact same thing when he killed Lo-Pan in "Big Trouble In Little China", and he didn't have any Spidey-Sense...
...it's all in the reflexes...
Well, the origin of Venom is convoluted in the movie, but in the comics I think it's a result of the symbiote being so A) so powerful as to be able to replicate those powers and B) so attached to Parker that he takes on those powers as his own.But my question is on one of the bigger plot holes, so I am hoping that one of the "comic geeks" can explain it to me. When Spidey rids himself of the "black suit" and it ends up on Brock/Venom, why does he suddenly have Spiderman "powers"? The doc said that the suit material would amplify the characteristics of its host. How does the comic treat this? I thought it was kind of dumb - we know that the Spidey suit is NOT the source of Spidermans' powers. So why does the black suit give Venom these powers?
Yeah, they're organic in the movie, mechanical in the comics. But, when he got the new suit (the symbiote) they were organic. One of what Parker thought of a "perks" from the new suit.I'm not sure if this plays into this question or not, but in the comic, Parker invented the spinnerettes and webbing, and in the movie, he just kinda grew 'em after being bitten.
I'm not sure if this plays into this question or not, but in the comic, Parker invented the spinnerettes and webbing, and in the movie, he just kinda grew 'em after being bitten.
Please god, for all that is good any holy, let me and the rest of the world forget about the "iron" costume.i wish they make a spiderman movie with his iron-spider costume..
That could have been an interesting storyline, but it was completely dismissed immediately after it happened when "Civil War" started.in the newer comics, spidey's webbing is organic now,
due to his re-birth..
after morlun killed him..
That could have been an interesting storyline, but it was completely dismissed immediately after it happened when "Civil War" started.
I wonder if they'll explore it again.
IMO, they're F'ing too much with a good thing. Killing May, revealing his identity, putting him in a technology suit, giving him these enhanced powers. It's too much. Spider-Man is best in his simplest moments.
Please god, for all that is good any holy, let me and the rest of the world forget about the "iron" costume.
That could have been an interesting storyline, but it was completely dismissed immediately after it happened when "Civil War" started.
I wonder if they'll explore it again.
IMO, they're F'ing too much with a good thing. Killing May, revealing his identity, putting him in a technology suit, giving him these enhanced powers. It's too much. Spider-Man is best in his simplest moments.
Saw it last night and..... well...... I guess it didn't suck.
Couple o' big plot holes, stuff that made no sense for the characters, 10 pounds of potatoes in a 5 pound bag... all true. The first half of the movie was excruciating.
However, the final fight sequences were, in fact, absolutely awesome. Helped make up for a lot.
So, in order, my favorites are Spidey 2, Spidey 1, and Spidey 3.
3 out of 5 stars from me.
The meteorite...what was the story in the cartoon/comic?Disapointed...
Where does the black stuff come from??
Okay entertainment, but huge holes in the plot IMO.
I saw this again over the weekend.
The guy who plays Flash Thompson in the first movie is at Harry's funeral. Also, there is a yellow Goblin mask in Harry's stash of helmets. This to me signals the Hobgoblin will be the next villian. In the comics, Hobgoblin framed Flash as being Hobgoblin
The meteorite...what was the story in the cartoon/comic?
I saw Spiderman 3 last week. The movie was good. I haven't seen Spiderman 2. Should I rent Spiderman 2?