I suppose I should have caveated my response saying it shouldn't apply to all international games i.e. meaningless ones, but olympic and world cup qualifiers or games it most certainly should.
The Eurobasket competition might fall into the meaningless category but it should be up to Len to decide that, not the Phoenix Suns. Of course, they have a vested interest but for any sportsman to play for one's country is often the pinnacle of sporting success - for the love, not the money, might be the best way to put it – and to deny them this right is, well..just not right.
I can accept the insurance side of things is not perfect, nor player injury management by an international team (why, for example, do players continue to come back injured from English football duty) but in an ideal world the former would be covered by insurance, the latter by collaboration between club and country. Until these are resolved as best they can be, then perhaps you have the right argument.
But it is certainly in the wrong spirit; some of my most enjoyable sporting moments have been from Australia doing well on the international stage - to think that if you guys were in charge they may never have happened. So sick.
Interestingly, there were 101 players from non-US countries who played in the NBA last year so even if those that run NBA teams shared your view (which they probably do – who doesn’t get frustrated at injuries that happen on international duty), the likelihood of ‘no national duty permitted’ actually ever coming into practice is virtually nil. Maybe not all of the 101 foreign players want to play for their countries when it counts but I'd bet most would.
Last point - Sir Stefan; an opening argument of "I'm sorry but you are wrong" is just arrogant. An open minded approach to an argument is usually the best way to approach things.