FArting
Lopes Up!
Tomorrow's summer league game will be on NBATV.
If you have a $100m contract and your team tells you you can’t play international ball without giving that up, what are you realistically going to do? You can’t on any reasonable ground break the contract as you’ve got a future to worry about, a family to feed (heh) etc etc. so, by definition, you are holding them hostage. And with 101 players (that’s a lot) from overseas, do you propose to tell them all the same thing? Of course not, you can’t, there would be no NBA if you did.Nobody is denying him the right to do anything. It absolutely should be up to Len to decide. He should be able to decide between money and love. if he wants to play for love, he can leave his contract behind. Nobody is proposing holding him hostage. We are just saying that since we are giving him money, we should have a say in those decisions. If he doesn't want a team to have a say, let's get rid of contract guarantees in those situations.
My mistake – you make one point (one) in your first post (they who pay the checks decide the rules) and then conclude I’m wrong. Either you’re a genius, capable of winning an argument in one point, or you’re arrogant…and I’m fairly confident you’re not a genius; if I was talking complete rubbish i.e. nothing about what I said makes sense then your analogy of 2 + 2 ≠ 5 might be correct. But I do have a valid point – it’s why we’re still arguing – so your reasoning here is the opposite of genius..it’s idiotic.First off, that was not an "opening argument. Typically, opening arguments are not located at the end of a post/ argument. Additionally, I wasn't having an argument. You asked, I answered. If you said that two plus two equaled five, I would tell you that you are wrong. This is no different.
“They who pay the checks decide the rules” is too blunt of an argument to be considered in any depth; bosses of Vietnam war veterans didn’t decide the rules on whether their employees could stay or go, NBA team owners don’t decide whether their players can play international ball..so if the real world tells me you're wrong, why would I accept being told I'm categorically wrong, end of story, and in one point no less? All I asked is that you argue with an open mind but you failed this request spectacularly - you therefore deserved a blunt response and you got one.Speaking of arrogance though, it is quite arrogant to ask for an opinion and then dismiss it before anyone responds.
A team, of course, should be able to protect their assets, but a player should also be able to protect his interests, and that means keeping his employment contract in place while also abiding by his sense of patriotic duty. I’m no expert on the international ball / insurance situation but it sounds imperfect; that may be so but that’s what progression is all about i.e. we will, as the club vs country issue continues, verge towards a perfect solution. But to say outright it’s a blunt choice between the two is, as I said before, just not right.You are probably right about that, though nobody is proposing a global band on international play. If they have no health concerns, don't have a history of running out of gas towards the end of the season after playing internationally, or don't have a freshly signed five year guaranteed max contract. We are just saying that a team should be able to protect their assets.
Booker looks bad, was not impressed yesterday and today well..
I am a little worried with McDonoughs scouting.
IF not for other teams choices we could have Cody Zeller, Nik Stauskas and Booker (yuck). Alec Brown does not look like a player at all.
I'm not worried about Booker. His shot was straight but short. Shooters are either short or long. Let's not forget he is only 18. He did get to the rim for a couple of baskets.
Archie seemed like all business today and his outside shot shows improvement. I like him getting to the FT line so long as driving the ball to the hoop is not his whole game.
Alec Brown does not look he is ready to play. Maybe he will never be. IMO, he just does not have the build. J. McNeal does not look like roster material either.
I was looking for a big man the Suns might be able to stash on their 15 man roster with some upside. I really didn't see it although Justin Harper might be worth a look.
Just once I wish the Suns would draft a banger like M. Harrell. I guess the Rockets must have a lock on these type players like Tarik Black last season.
What's funny is that on the Rockets, Harrel isn't even a top 5 big man on their own team. They will have Dwight, Motiejunas, Smith, Jones, and Capela would all be above him. If he was on the Suns, Harrel would be able to compete for that 4th big man spot with Teletovic & Leur.
He'd be a perfect banger to have here. Morey does a fantastic job with scouting for the Rockets.
What's funny is that on the Rockets, Harrel isn't even a top 5 big man on their own team. They will have Dwight, Motiejunas, Smith, Jones, and Capela would all be above him. If he was on the Suns, Harrel would be able to compete for that 4th big man spot with Teletovic & Leur.
He'd be a perfect banger to have here. Morey does a fantastic job with scouting for the Rockets.
I watched the first half of the game just now and I thought the same thing about Harrell. I swear the Suns just never pay any attention to guy's strength.
Really? Based on us not taking Harrell? With what pick... the 13th?
The Suns are plenty big and strong.
The knee jerk reactions to brief bits of play in the horrible NBA Summer League are crazy to me. Harrell puts up 11-8 against our Len-less front court of non-prospects and BOOM; according to an earlier post he would be our "4th best big man".
80% of the guys in these games will never see NBA serious NBA minutes, these guys all met like... a week ago, they got only a few days of practice together. No conclusions can be drawn based on this mess of a "league".
The general consensus is that the Suns need to get stronger inside because we're getting killed on the boards on most nights.