Chaplin
Better off silent
Not that it matters, but Alan Williams was named to the All-Summer League First Team and Tyler Ulis the Second Team. Which is... weird.
Not that it matters, but Alan Williams was named to the All-Summer League First Team and Tyler Ulis the Second Team. Which is... weird.
Well. No more signings coming. Trades unlikely. Summer camp over. We probably all need to take August off.
There is no way we have given up on him unless his injury is career threatening. It is odd, we have heard very few details on the exact nature of his injury except that it was his foot, it required surgery and the healing time seems really long.I hope you're right. What's your reasoning (or source)? I know I'd figured no trades a few weeks ago when I heard Ryan say that Dudley was likely to be the starter at power forward but then I remembered who I was listening to. That's not the kind of thing he'd feel obligated to be truthful about.
I'm going to be very disappointed if we start the season with Tucker, Dudley and Channing as our front line. I think that would feel a lot like last year. Although I guess it would make some sense if they start that lineup with the idea of taking pressure off the young guys while still playing them major minutes. We'd be developing the kids and earning a lottery pick in what's expected to be a loaded class. But I'm just not sure Sarver has that much patience.
Actually, I'm crossing my fingers that we have a plan and that it doesn't really include Dudley starting at the 4. I'm hoping that Warren really has grown to 6'9 and added enough muscle to play the 4 spot regularly. A starting lineup of Bledsoe, Knight, Booker, Warren and Len would make me happy. As would a lineup of Bledsoe, Booker, Bender/Chriss, Warren and Len. If Warren is all the way healthy when the season begins, he really needs to be a starter at one of the forward spots. Unless we've already given up on him?
Troy Williams has the potential to be a rotation player although obviously there are some Gerald Green like issues with him. Kuric isn't a rotation player IMO more like a Dionte Christmas. I just think he makes more sense than continuing to waste time with Goodwin. I think we've burned our bridges there even if he does finally learn the game and he's clearly unhappy so why keep him around?
There is no silence regarding Warren, he is simply rehabbing.
As for Goodwin being unhappy, where is the proof of that?
What did he say?Warren was at summer league.
Archie Goodwin was at his moms home the last weeks and watching summer league from home. He commented on the games in his snapchat.
What did he say?
I hope you meant Chandler because this immediately made me wonder if did something to acquire Frye backI hope you're right. What's your reasoning (or source)? I know I'd figured no trades a few weeks ago when I heard Ryan say that Dudley was likely to be the starter at power forward but then I remembered who I was listening to. That's not the kind of thing he'd feel obligated to be truthful about.
I'm going to be very disappointed if we start the season with Tucker, Dudley and Channing as our front line. I think that would feel a lot like last year. Although I guess it would make some sense if they start that lineup with the idea of taking pressure off the young guys while still playing them major minutes. We'd be developing the kids and earning a lottery pick in what's expected to be a loaded class. But I'm just not sure Sarver has that much patience.
I hope you meant Chandler because this immediately made me wonder if did something to acquire Frye back
And yea I'm hoping that Warren can start at SF and that Tucker can get moved to PF. With his lack of shooting and his physicality, PF is the better position for Tucker even if he be overmatched size on a daily basis. It probably is a good idea to not start Bender or Chriss right away since they both look unready for the NBA much less a starting role.
If Len can quit fouling and stay healthy (something that we've all been saying for the past 3 years) then hopefully he can take over the starting job from Chandler.
Ideally I hope this is our lineup by all star break
PG Bledsoe (or Ulis once Bledsoe suffers his annual injury)
SG Booker
SF Warren
PF Tucker
C Len
I hope this isn't the case. Booker isn't a SF, he's a SG through and through.Hah. Yeah, definitely meant Chandler not Channing. But with the reports that Warren has grown to 6'9 and added muscle, I'd like to give him a try at PF first. And it looks quite possible that Booker will be moving to the SF spot so it works nicely. A lineup of Bledsoe, Knight, Booker,Warren and Len could be pretty entertaining, at one end of the court. But pretty scary at the other end.
I hope this isn't the case. Booker isn't a SF, he's a SG through and through.
I wish the Suns would try and use size to their advantage for once. The Warriors didn't put Klay at SF just because he's tall enough for it. Neither did the Lakers with Kobe or the Hawks with Joe Johnson etc.
I can see playing SF and taking the pounding from that position having a negative impact on Booker's development. And besides, Bledsoe, Knight and Booker all on the court at the same will not be all that great even offensively since their all so ball dominant. Bring Knight's ass off the bench. If he won't do it, then suspend him.
I don't think there's any doubt that if Joe Johnson were a young man he'd be full time small forward in today's game. Other than perhaps point guard, basketball positions are pretty much defined (or labeled) by who you can defend.
Booker is still growing and he's simply a larger man than he was just 6 months ago. Watching him, he looks like a small forward. And there really isn't all that much more pounding at small forward in today's game. But it sounds like Booker wants to be the one doing that pounding as he's been working hard at his post-up game. I suspect at his size and build, he'll be defended often by small forwards anyway.
Booker didn't look to me any taller than 6'6 despite some saying he's grown to 6'7 or 6'8 now.I don't think there's any doubt that if Joe Johnson were a young man he'd be full time small forward in today's game. Other than perhaps point guard, basketball positions are pretty much defined (or labeled) by who you can defend.
Booker is still growing and he's simply a larger man than he was just 6 months ago. Watching him, he looks like a small forward. And there really isn't all that much more pounding at small forward in today's game. But it sounds like Booker wants to be the one doing that pounding as he's been working hard at his post-up game. I suspect at his size and build, he'll be defended often by small forwards anyway.
Booker didn't look to me any taller than 6'6 despite some saying he's grown to 6'7 or 6'8 now.
Also if defense is how a player's position is labeled then Booker should probably remain at SG because he couldn't defend any SGs so I don't know why anyone would think that he'd be better against SFs.
Just because he's working on a post game doesn't mean he should switch to SF. Klay Thompson has a post game that he uses to his advantage when being defended by shorter SGs so why can't the Suns do the same with Booker?
Suns need to ask Steve Kerr how he utilizes Klay and they need to follow that exact blue print. And that blue print never included anything about using Klay as SF so it shouldn't with Booker. Booker has a chance to maybe even be better than Klay someday.
It's about using Booker's height to his advantage vs other SGs just like Klay uses his height vs other SGs. You put Booker or Klay at SF and that height advantage is gone.Uhhh, no they don't. I can't for the life of me think of a reason to do that. They aren't the same players, we aren't the same teams, we don't run the same system and we don't have the same surrounding pieces.