Summer league 2016

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,595
Reaction score
58,023
Location
SoCal
Except you don't know that. Since you don't watch games and consistently go off stat lines, what is your justification for such an opinion?

Slin's right. He has zero hops. He's not a rim protector. And most of his shots in summer league will be sent back in the pros.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,510
Reaction score
15,600
Location
Arizona
Slin's right. He has zero hops. He's not a rim protector. And most of his shots in summer league will be sent back in the pros.

Yes but Slin is the only one that brought up "rim protector". Prior to his comment I didn't see anybody make that claim?!!? He completely ignored he is average 15 PPG and being a good free throw shooter.

Not that ANY of that will translate at the next level. He said aside from rebounds which seemed like cherry picking. Why would rebounds translate but not points? I don't think you can really determine what will translate at this point. I think the point is, based on what we have seen...it would be nice to at least give him a look at the next level to see what he can do.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,419
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
Slin's right. He has zero hops. He's not a rim protector. And most of his shots in summer league will be sent back in the pros.
What's your definition of "rim protector"? If it's someone that gets tons of blocks, sure, ok, he's no rim protector. But if that definition includes taking up space in the paint and consistently challenging shots and getting defensive rebounds, then I think he can or has fit that bill.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
What's your definition of "rim protector"? If it's someone that gets tons of blocks, sure, ok, he's no rim protector. But if that definition includes taking up space in the paint and consistently challenging shots and getting defensive rebounds, then I think he can or has fit that bill.
It's someone that either blocks shots or alters shots. Williams does neither and when he is on the floor guys have no issue with the idea of going right over the top of him for layups.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
For a 3rd string big man, Williams does his job well. He controls the paint and uses his wide body well. He tends to rush his inside shots probably because he's worried about being blocked but all in all, he's a nice pickup for us.
 

Chaplin

Better off silent
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
46,419
Reaction score
16,934
Location
Round Rock, TX
For a 3rd string big man, Williams does his job well. He controls the paint and uses his wide body well. He tends to rush his inside shots probably because he's worried about being blocked but all in all, he's a nice pickup for us.
Agreed.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
He is a 6'8, if you believe he is a rim protector more power to you.
Being 6'8 doesn't mean he can't be a rim protector.

Draymond Green is 6'7 and yet he's a rim protector. I don't know if he gets a ton of blocks but he sure as hell alters many shots at the rim and opposing players account for him when they drive at the rim. His ability to protect the rim and play the 5 is one of the biggest reasons the Warriors small ball works so well.
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
I didn't actually say that Alan W. is a good rim protecter... I said his rim protection stats were very good, referring to the tracking data scored against stat. His percentage is 38. which is obviously great and his number of shots challenged is over 10 per 36min, also a very good number. The gnat in the unguetine is that its based on only 78 minutes of PT. What I said was he merits the chance to prove himself and slin came back with his lame "he's only 6'8" as if I wouldn't know that.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,037
Reaction score
58,339
I know one thing Alan Williams does well and that is rebound. He does not let opposing teams get many second shots at the basket. Rebounding is a valuable commodity in the NBA and it changes the game by not letting opponents get second shots at the basket. He is ferocious under the basket on defense. I'd like to keep him as a third center if possible.
 

leclerc

The smooth operator
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Posts
2,408
Reaction score
1,054
Location
Norway
He's as good as any end of the bench token big men we've had, except maybe that bald white corner three point shooter. I like him. Hope they pick up the option and sign him now already.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,595
Reaction score
58,023
Location
SoCal
Being 6'8 doesn't mean he can't be a rim protector.

Draymond Green is 6'7 and yet he's a rim protector. I don't know if he gets a ton of blocks but he sure as hell alters many shots at the rim and opposing players account for him when they drive at the rim. His ability to protect the rim and play the 5 is one of the biggest reasons the Warriors small ball works so well.

It's not his height that makes him a non-rim protector. It's his lack of height, lack of length, and inability to jump. Alan Williams looks like a good rebounder and maybe a good position defender in the post as he's got a load in his seat. But he will never be a rim protector and his offense is EXTREMELY limited because he lacks the footspeed to take anyone off the dribble, doesn't posses an outside shot, and is so earthbound that he can't score inside effectively. He has shown ability to get to the charity strike, but that's in summer league. In regular season I think his shot will get sent back consistently.

This is not to rip Alan Williams. Rather it's a pretty unbiased view of who he is and who he isn't.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,037
Reaction score
58,339
I don't know how the discussion morphed into whether Alan Williams is a rim protector. He is not, but he does occupy a lot of space under the basket which leads to rebounds. He is very aggressive on the boards. Watching the summer league games it is clear the Suns are a much better team with Williams on the court.
 

sunsfan88

ASFN Icon
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Posts
11,660
Reaction score
844
It's not his height that makes him a non-rim protector. It's his lack of height, lack of length, and inability to jump. Alan Williams looks like a good rebounder and maybe a good position defender in the post as he's got a load in his seat. But he will never be a rim protector and his offense is EXTREMELY limited because he lacks the footspeed to take anyone off the dribble, doesn't posses an outside shot, and is so earthbound that he can't score inside effectively. He has shown ability to get to the charity strike, but that's in summer league. In regular season I think his shot will get sent back consistently.

This is not to rip Alan Williams. Rather it's a pretty unbiased view of who he is and who he isn't.
Slin seemed to say that he was not a rim protector because he was 6'8. That was merely the point I was arguing. I'm not saying that Alan Williams is or isn't a rim protector.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,595
Reaction score
58,023
Location
SoCal
Maybe rim protector does not necessarily mean highlight shotblocking?


If you want to redefine the term, you can. But traditionally "rim protector" has meant shot blocker. You're playing with words a bit to include "highlight" to strengthen your argument. But rim protector means someone who blocks shots, or whose ability to block shots either results in altered shots or dissuading others to come into the paint to shoot for fear of being blocked.

Alan Williams is a big body who eats space in the post and collects rebounds. He is most assuredly not a "rim protector" by any sense of the phrase.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,510
Reaction score
15,600
Location
Arizona
I don't know. I scoured the Internet for an official meaning and I found out two things. One it's debated much and two most people seem to hate the term because they find it nebulous. For me it appears that from a stat perspective you use opposing FG% and blocks to determine that. So I think both are a factor. The FG% at the rim wasn't for just any shot anywhere on the court but actually at the rim.

I have no skin in the game. I just think the definition isn't all that clear and both sides have a point. Just for me if you want to talk about blocks only you should say shot blocker to avoid confusion.
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,603
I don't know. I scoured the Internet for an official meaning and I found out two things. One it's debated much and two most people seem to hate the term because they find it nebulous. For me it appears that from a stat perspective you use opposing FG% and blocks to determine that. So I think both are a factor. The FG% at the rim wasn't for just any shot anywhere on the court but actually at the rim.

I have no skin in the game. I just think the definition isn't all that clear and both sides have a point. Just for me if you want to talk about blocks only you should say shot blocker to avoid confusion.
Nobody is trying to simplify it to just shot blocking, but the combination of blocking shots and altering shots. Sure Williams may have a good opponent fg% at the rim in this SL, but that's just it this is SL and it's a small sample size. Nothing about the way he plays inside would suggest he does a whole lot to alter shots.
 

Covert Rain

Father smelt of elderberries!
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Posts
36,510
Reaction score
15,600
Location
Arizona
Nobody is trying to simplify it to just shot blocking, but the combination of blocking shots and altering shots. Sure Williams may have a good opponent fg% at the rim in this SL, but that's just it this is SL and it's a small sample size. Nothing about the way he plays inside would suggest he does a whole lot to alter shots.

Simplifying it would be just to use the term shot blocking. My point is that rim protector isn't as clear cut as some people are making it out be. I found about 4 forums in a matter of minutes having the same debate we are right now. I am looking at it from the definition of the stat. At any rate, doesn't matter this conversation got off track for something nobody was really arguing IMO to begin with.

The original point is that Williams is an interesting prospect that could be a future contributor. Saying he is only a rebounder while ignoring the other stuff he does on the court feels like a bit of cherry picking IMO.
 

devilalum

Heavily Redacted
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Posts
16,776
Reaction score
3,187
So if you're a good weak side help shot blocker but a bad man defender with bad footwork can you be a rim protector?

from phone
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,037
Reaction score
58,339
The Suns will have their hands full in the semi-finals today.

Dragon Bender is out today with a ankle sprain. Chriss is ill.

The game against Minnesota is at 3 p.m. on ESPN2.

Paul Coro ‏@paulcoro 7m7 minutes ago


Marquese Chriss (ill) still isn't with the Suns. Dragan Bender (ankle sprain) also won't play in today's 3 p.m. semi vs. Minnesota on ESPN2.
 
OP
OP
JCSunsfan

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Kind of difficult for one guy to do it all on his own.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,037
Reaction score
58,339
Ulis appeared tired today and never seemed to play up to his abilities. Maybe too many games in a row.

Troy Williams looked liked he could will the Suns to a win until he appeared to injure his ankle. Prior to this, he was so athletic and could do just about anything except hit a 3 point shot. He had 24 points and 6 rebounds.

Kuric did not do himself any favors with 3-11 shooting.

Alan Williams showed rebounding may not be enough.

A. Booker shot well from the field.

My takeaway. I particularly want the Suns to keep Troy Williams as he can make things happen. Kuric is also probably worth a look in training camp.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
Ulis appeared tired today and never seemed to play up to his abilities. Maybe too many games in a row.

Troy Williams looked liked he could will the Suns to a win until he appeared to injure his ankle. Prior to this, he was so athletic and could do just about anything except hit a 3 point shot. He had 24 points and 6 rebounds.

Kuric did not do himself any favors with 3-11 shooting.

Alan Williams showed rebounding may not be enough.

A. Booker shot well from the field.

My takeaway. I particularly want the Suns to keep Troy Williams as he can make things happen. Kuric is also probably worth a look in training camp.

Troy Williams has the potential to be a rotation player although obviously there are some Gerald Green like issues with him. Kuric isn't a rotation player IMO more like a Dionte Christmas. I just think he makes more sense than continuing to waste time with Goodwin. I think we've burned our bridges there even if he does finally learn the game and he's clearly unhappy so why keep him around?
 
Top