And I'm saying that I don't see it. You've said often that you felt Nash wore down at the end of last season and in the playoffs, but I disagree. He struggles when the game becomes more physical, but that's not a fatigue issue. I thought he was the same player in April that he was in December.
I do think that he becomes more error-prone when he has logged a lot of minutes in a given game, and it wouldn't surprise me if that effect is magnified on back-to-backs.
I think the result is the same: the Suns lose, and Nash has a clean slate for the next game.
Actually, I thought he "wore down" much earlier than that. He was incredible the first month or so and was hit and miss the rest of the season. He still finished with decent numbers but he went from being the best point guard in the game to something much less than that.
Nash does have a reputation for wearing out come the end of the season which is well established. I point this out not as proof you're wrong but to show that you're not actually disagreeing with me on this issue. You're disagreeing with popular opinion (not a bad thing to do). Like you, I'm not sure that I believe he historically disappeared late in the season because of too many minutes. But I do believe it happened last year and that, as he ages, it's likely to get worse.
Last year, I noticed that his passes really lost a lot of steam following that first stretch. He was unable to make some of those incredible passes that we've learned to take for granted. He also struggled more with his shot. He seems again to be struggling with his shot.
I agree that he struggles when the game becomes more physical. Van Gundy made that idiotic comment where he said that he learned to stop Nash by putting taller players on him but that was never the "secret". We always struggled against Detroit for example because Billups played him so physically. And it wasn't exhaustion that caused him problems against LA, it was the absolute mugging by Derek that the refs repeatedly ignored.
Steve