green machine
I rule at posting
Yeah but we get majority of our points via the fastbreak, not jumpers. If the 3's arent dropping, we go inside
The majority of the points? What? I take it math isn't your strong suit?
Yeah but we get majority of our points via the fastbreak, not jumpers. If the 3's arent dropping, we go inside
Right but i don't hear any panic from those camps like i do here. At least not from the fan base.Dallas is missing Harris. Sterns are missing Parker. Lakers are missing Bynum.
2-2? 3-2? 2-3?we're winning games? really? remind me...what is our record since the trade?? oh yeah....
Not to mention that we lost on a miracle buzzer beater against the Hornets & lost by 2 on the road tonight by a good(not great) team.we're winning games? really? remind me...what is our record since the trade?? oh yeah....
2-2? 3-2? 2-3?
that shot wasn't really a miracle...not anymore than the 3's we hit to stay in the game and send it to overtime were miracles. we lost by 2 to a team that we should beat, and that we have a good shot of meeting in the first round. that's twice this year they've beaten us...a slight cause for concern.Not to mention that we lost on a miracle buzzer beater against the Hornets & lost by 2 on the road tonight by a good(not great) team.
Technicalities aside then ok...were playing .500 ball. We're not exactly losing games then are we?2-2, actually.
we just barely beat washington, just barely beat seattle too. our losses were both close as well. we could very easily be 4-0 or 0-4 since the trade. either way, the team isn't exactly "winning games".
The majority of the points? What? I take it math isn't your strong suit?
Don't need to be upset about a loss in GSW at all. They wanted this so badly, Ellis played all 48 minutes, Baron for 45+, S.Jackson for 43+. The Rockets won earlier, so the Warriors know they must win this one to stay at #8 seed.
Well I guess insults arent your strong suit either right? Either way, I meant when our 3's arent dropping, we go inside, matter fact I actually wrote that after so reading might not be your strong suit either....
Need a 2 man game with STAT & the big Saguaro. Keep Nash out of the game due to his pathetic defense and keep everyone else back far enough in the backcourt to hit 3s and stop the transition. Let Amare & Shaq just beat them up all game long and we win. Simple. We're catering to them the way we're playing with Nash on the court. Nash is fine for 98% of the teams in the league but I see him being a negative factor playing as many minutes as he did last night. Other than Biedrins, everyone of their guys can pop a 3 & put the ball on the floor with ease. You can't hide Nash against this team. Period.
Well it would be 3 less minutes of horrible defense in a 2 point loss.37 minutes is too much? He is averaging 34.5. So the 3 extra minutes that he played last night is that big of a deal?
37 minutes is too much? He is averaging 34.5. So the 3 extra minutes that he played last night is that big of a deal?
He shouldnt have played more than 20 minutes last night. Not against that team. The team captain should know when he's not helping his team.
You're kidding right?
Baron Davis and Monta Ellis were abusing everyone, Nash, Barbosa, and to a lesser extent Strawberry all night long. Should we have played Pike instead? Because that was about our only other option. As it was, Strawberry got 18 minutes last night.
Need a 2 man game with STAT & the big Saguaro. Keep Nash out of the game due to his pathetic defense and keep everyone else back far enough in the backcourt to hit 3s and stop the transition. Let Amare & Shaq just beat them up all game long and we win. Simple. We're catering to them the way we're playing with Nash on the court. Nash is fine for 98% of the teams in the league but I see him being a negative factor playing as many minutes as he did last night. Other than Biedrins, everyone of their guys can pop a 3 & put the ball on the floor with ease. You can't hide Nash against this team. Period.
I'm saying we need another backup PG... someone more defensive minded. Someone who can body up on the likes of Monte Ellis, Tony Parker.
Nash isn't contributing enough if everytime down the court the opposing team is ramming it down his throat. FFS he's not even putting his arms up!
Its an easy bucket everytime. I'd rather nash be placed on a pure shooter than someone who can take him to the hole every possession.