Suns have 6th pick and 32nd pick in 2019 draft.

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Culver is a better free throw shooter than Clarke. :D

I know, but at least Clarke is a power forward. Still, Clarke is my second-to-worst case scenario at 6 behind only Culver.

In the poll for worst pick at 6, Culver and Clarke were my two votes.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
How does he compare as a power forward?

It's hard for me to get excited about drafting a 23 year old power forward that is likely near his ceiling. He has played three seasons of college ball to get where he is today. I like other power forward candidates better.
 

Superbone

Phoenix native; Lifelong Suns Fan
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Posts
6,337
Reaction score
3,475
Location
Phoenix, AZ
It's hard for me to get excited about drafting a 23 year old power forward that is likely near his ceiling. He has played three seasons of college ball to get where he is today. I like other power forward candidates better.
Like who?
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
I know, but at least Clarke is a power forward. Still, Clarke is my second-to-worst case scenario at 6 behind only Culver.

In the poll for worst pick at 6, Culver and Clarke were my two votes.

I think the Suns should expand their horizon beyond the projected top 10-11 players.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
It's hard for me to get excited about drafting a 23 year old power forward that is likely near his ceiling. He has played three seasons of college ball to get where he is today. I like other power forward candidates better.

Me too but in fairness, he dominated in college ball and his floor is higher than a lot of these guy's ceilings. The only reason people aren't penciling him in as the 2nd pick (IMO) is due to his less than ideal wingspan. He's not built like Harrell but I expect him to at least be a slightly better version of Montrezl.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Me too but in fairness, he dominated in college ball and his floor is higher than a lot of these guy's ceilings. The only reason people aren't penciling him in as the 2nd pick (IMO) is due to his less than ideal wingspan. He's not built like Harrell but I expect him to at least be a slightly better version of Montrezl.

And that he can't shoot at all from the outside, and that he really didn't show all that much as a prospect until the last half of a season, when opponents were putting all of their attention in the front court on Hachimura and Tillie.

Clarke is a center in a small forward's body.
 
Last edited:

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
Have you SEEN the list of no-names they’ve already brought in?

Except for Grant Williams, I think most of those previously brought in will not be drafted.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
Minnesota reportedly worked out Coby White on Friday.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
It's hard for me to get excited about drafting a 23 year old power forward that is likely near his ceiling. He has played three seasons of college ball to get where he is today. I like other power forward candidates better.

I haven't really watched much college ball this year, so I have no educated opinion on any prospects. That said, if they draft someone who is developed and can be an actual contributor (even as a bench player), I am fine with it. I am sick of passing on Sabonis to draft Bender and Chriss.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
I haven't really watched much college ball this year, so I have no educated opinion on any prospects. That said, if they draft someone who is developed and can be an actual contributor (even as a bench player), I am fine with it. I am sick of passing on Sabonis to draft Bender and Chriss.

I understand this sentiment. Still 207 pounds sounds light for a power forward.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
I understand this sentiment. Still 207 pounds sounds light for a power forward.

Like I said, Clarke is a center in a small forward's body.

The more we go back and forth on these, the more convinced I am that Hunter needs to be the pick at 6, and if Hunter is not there and we can't trade out of the spot, then we need to take whomever is left between Garland and White.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
Like I said, Clarke is a center in a small forward's body.

The more we go back and forth on these, the more convinced I am that Hunter needs to be the pick at 6, and if Hunter is not there and we can't trade out of the spot, then we need to take whomever is left between Garland and White.

At least Garland or White would fill a need. I'm open to Hunter but I like other big men better.
 
OP
OP
Yuma

Yuma

Suns are my Kryptonite!
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Posts
22,684
Reaction score
12,435
Location
Laveen, AZ
At least Garland or White would fill a need. I'm open to Hunter but I like other big men better.
If we could get Hunter, and we are getting a vet PG, I would double up at 32 with another big. This is the year to add size. Seems like not a lot of skills we are wowing about in this draft. There is size, though.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,467
Reaction score
18,369
Location
The Giant Toaster
Hunter has nice shooting numbers but his release is slow and he has to be set. I don’t see him being a dynamic NBA shooter and his steal/block rate was much worse than Bridges and Villanova. He’s very low ceiling forward.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
Who do you like better?

That's a tough question because Garland played in only like 5 games last season because of injury. A lot of it is projection. He has this Curry quick twitch but he had more turnovers than assists.

I like White's height and his ability to score. He should be able to improve his playmaking.

I'm leaning towards Garland because he has a higher upside but it's very close.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
Hunter has nice shooting numbers but his release is slow and he has to be set. I don’t see him being a dynamic NBA shooter and his steal/block rate was much worse than Bridges and Villanova. He’s very low ceiling forward.

I agree his ceiling is lower than others, but I also think he has a very high floor. In fact, I think Hunter's floor is higher than Culver's ceiling.
 

1Sun

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Posts
8,750
Reaction score
1,129
Location
Chandler, AZ
That's a tough question because Garland played in only like 5 games last season because of injury. A lot of it is projection. He has this Curry quick twitch but he had more turnovers than assists.

I like White's height and his ability to score. He should be able to improve his assists.

I'm leaning towards Garland because he has a higher upside but it's very close.

I meant which big man do you prefer to Hunter.

That being said, thanks for your take on White and Garland. I am pretty much of the same mindset, but I think that either way we still need to acquire a serviceable veteran point guard to start opposite Booker.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
I meant which big man do you prefer to Hunter.

That being said, thanks for your take on White and Garland. I am pretty much of the same mindset, but I think that either way we still need to acquire a serviceable veteran point guard to start opposite Booker.

I'm liking Sekou, Grant Williams, Kabengele and Bazley. It would also be nice to draft Ty Jerome with a later pick.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
I am sure you are right - but they will be taken after the 10th pick in all likelihood.

You really should not swing for the fences at 6 - We tried that with Bender and Chriss - and look how that turned out.
Many times the safe pick is also the star pick. Nash, Majerle, Booker, even Tatum and Markannen we’re safe picks.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,326
The Suns appear to have strong interest in Brandon Clarke.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Proximo

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Posts
12,712
Reaction score
10,601
The Suns appear to have strong interest in Brandon Clarke.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

Well he probably wouldn’t bust, but I can’t see him ever being anything more than a role player.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,681
Posts
5,410,697
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top