Can we all at least agree at this point that Dario Saric is NOT an NBA caliber starting power forward?
“Wretched” most of his shots are 3sActually, he is shooting an admittedly decent 39% from 3, but a wretched 42.7% overall.
https://www.espn.com/nba/player/_/id/3138196/cameron-johnson
“Wretched” most of his shots are 3s
Actually, he is shooting an admittedly decent 39% from 3, but a wretched 42.7% overall.
https://www.espn.com/nba/player/_/id/3138196/cameron-johnson
Going into tonight he was shooting 39% from 3 and 50% from 2 point range. That is far from wretched.
He's led the team in rebounding 4 of the left 5 games. What are you looking for on an NBA starting caliber PF for this team? I'll take your comments offline.Can we all at least agree at this point that Dario Saric is NOT an NBA caliber starting power forward?
He's led the team in rebounding 4 of the left 5 games. What are you looking for on an NBA starting caliber PF for this team? I'll take your comments offline.
Also 92nd in the league right now in true shooting, ahead of Kawhi Leonard. Sure we can upgrade the PF position long term, but it's a silly scape goat. We are losing games right now because we are thin up front. One guy got hurt and the other guy got suspended just because ESPN has it out for the state of Arizona.
When looking at the Suns defense it's not just they are getting hurt inside.
The Magic shot 56% from 3 point range. It's a breakdown everywhere.
I think the issue is that we let teams get into a rhythm early in games and they then torch us as the game progresses.In all fairness, a lot of those threes were contested.
I'm in!Can we all at least agree at this point that Dario Saric is NOT an NBA caliber starting power forward?
I'm in!
It is a shame that, when Ayton returns, a role-playing Power Forward won't be on board to make us
solid at all five starting positions. And, more importantly, provide balance. Especially for Ayton.
Why do the Suns always get our hopes up (except when they don't even do that) and do a
complete job. Throughout their history, there has always been something missing.
I hate to be so negative here but...This is only Jerome's second game. He is still learning what he can and can't do.
A lot of it has to do with the speed of the players closing passing lanes and learning what he can do inside.
Jerome is not going to be able to shoot it over Bamba which other Suns players need to learn as well.
I was a super big Brandon Clarke fan. I had him in my polls on the board for the #6 pick. When we traded down I was on the edge of my seat hoping Clarke would fall to us and I was super pissed when we passed on him. With that being said, my desire to draft Clarke was based purely on theory on how he would fit since I hadn’t really seen what the offense Monte was going to run looked like. Now that I have seen it I don’t really think Clarke is what we need at the power forward position. In Monte’s offense the power forward position is getting almost 10 three point attempts per game, and most of those attempts are fairly wide open. What this offense needs is a sharp shooting stretch four who can bang a little down low on defense. A younger Gallinari/Mirotic type would be perfect for this team.The sad thing is that Brandon Clarke was right there for the taking, and he would have given us just what we needed at the power forward position.
I hate to be so negative here but...
I'm not concerned with him learning what he can and can't do. I'm concerned that merely above average defenders are going to figure out what he can do and utterly shut him down. His lateral movement isn't even remotely NBA quality. The vast majority, if not all of starting Gs have quicker lateral movement than he does. It's truly remarkable how slow he is. I can't think of a single G in the history of the NBA who moved slower and was more flat footed.
I was a super big Brandon Clarke fan. I had him in my polls on the board for the #6 pick. When we traded down I was on the edge of my seat hoping Clarke would fall to us and I was super pissed when we passed on him. With that being said, my desire to draft Clarke was based purely on theory on how he would fit since I hadn’t really seen what the offense Monte was going to run looked like. Now that I have seen it I don’t really think Clarke is what we need at the power forward position. In Monte’s offense the power forward position is getting almost 10 three point attempts per game, and most of those attempts are fairly wide open. What this offense needs is a sharp shooting stretch four who can bang a little down low on defense. A younger Gallinari/Mirotic type would be perfect for this team.
Where is the Suns defense? They started the season so well and now the intensity has vanished. If they want to be a .500 team everyone has to put in the work on defense.
#RegressionToTheMeanWhere is the Suns defense? They started the season so well and now the intensity has vanished. If they want to be a .500 team everyone has to put in the work on defense.
The sad thing is that Brandon Clarke was right there for the taking, and he would have given us just what we needed at the power forward position.
I hate to be so negative here but...
I'm not concerned with him learning what he can and can't do. I'm concerned that merely above average defenders are going to figure out what he can do and utterly shut him down. His lateral movement isn't even remotely NBA quality. The vast majority, if not all of starting Gs have quicker lateral movement than he does. It's truly remarkable how slow he is. I can't think of a single G in the history of the NBA who moved slower and was more flat footed. I swear he has to take 3 steps for every one of another PGs.
In each of the last two games I watched an average player blow by him while he was defending the perimeter. His lack of lateral movement is already getting exposed. Wouldn't be surprised to see him get posterized time and time again with competent cross overs. Couple that with his extremely rare Wingspan:Height ratio < 1.0 and he has no chance guarding average NBA Gs one on one. Absolutely no chance.
I fully expect him to lead the league in blocks given up inside the 3 point line. He's got really good body control, but horrific lift off the floor. He's Frank Kaminsky without the 7 feet. He will get blocked time and time again. And good defenders will never let him get by them. Just move your feet at 3/4's speed and you'll shut down his penetration. He is smart however, and in the flow of the offense he will get penetration... only to get blocked or have his shot severely altered.
He is a really good shooter, an exceptionally smart basketball player (exceptionally), a good leader, plays with all heart and hustle, a gym rat, a winner in college... but more than likely, not an NBA player.
Once teams figure him out, it's over.
In all fairness, a lot of those threes were contested.
I was a super big Brandon Clarke fan. I had him in my polls on the board for the #6 pick. When we traded down I was on the edge of my seat hoping Clarke would fall to us and I was super pissed when we passed on him. With that being said, my desire to draft Clarke was based purely on theory on how he would fit since I hadn’t really seen what the offense Monte was going to run looked like. Now that I have seen it I don’t really think Clarke is what we need at the power forward position. In Monte’s offense the power forward position is getting almost 10 three point attempts per game, and most of those attempts are fairly wide open. What this offense needs is a sharp shooting stretch four who can bang a little down low on defense. A younger Gallinari/Mirotic type would be perfect for this team.
Out of curiosity, how do you evaluate Ayton's potential skills in that regard?I think has to do with a few things, there is no inside presence at all. The difference between Baynes and Kaminsky as your rim protector/primary rebounder is night and day. Baynes is about as tough as anyone in the NBA and Kaminsky has probably been the weakest 7 footer in each of his 5 years in the league. Teams wouldn't test Baynes but they'll go at Kaminsky all game.
Another is how not having that guy behind you covering back hurts the perimeter defense in two ways. Players on the perimeter are now gambling more to try to keep guys from getting past them, which hasn't worked, and they know that once that players gets to Kaminsky that he isn't going to call them out in the same way Baynes did. Baynes held his teammates accountable. That was a big talking point early on, how everyone was holding their teammates accountable but you don't hear about it anymore.
Baynes was also the defensive leader who set the tone. Not only was he a take no crap sort of tough guy but he also called out schemes and switches for others. Baynes has played for some great coaches and on some great teams. He's probably forgotten more about defense than Kaminsky knows. He was able to play the role of captain out there on defense and help direct everyone quite well. The same thing was clear in Boston last year, that the Celtics defense was best when Baynes was on the floor. He had the best defensive plus/minus on that team by like 6 or 7 points, which is very impressive given he only played about 20 minutes a game and they are a good defensive team without him.
The short answer as to what happened to the defense is simple though, Kaminsky isn't Baynes.