Suns pre-draft workouts

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
What do you all think about DiVincenzo at #16? I think he could play PG in NBA. He didn't have to at VILL because they had Brunson but DiVincenzo can create his own shot, handle the ball, play on or off the ball and at 6'6 he would make a tall back court with Booker. He is also a scrappy defender with a 42 inch vertical. There are questions on whether he can keep up with quicker guards but he came in 5th at Combine lane agility drill which tests quickness and change of direction ability.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
He didn't have to at VILL because they had Brunson but DiVincenzo can create his own shot, handle the ball, play on or off the ball and at 6'6 he would make a tall back court with Booker. He is also a scrappy defender with a 42 inch vertical. There are questions on whether he can keep up with quicker guards but he came in 5th at Combine lane agility drill which tests quickness and change of direction ability.

I think that's inflated by 2.5 inches. I know they occasionally make mistakes but I'm pretty sure he measured 6'3.5 (according to the combine report I saw).
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I think that's inflated by 2.5 inches. I know they occasionally make mistakes but I'm pretty sure he measured 6'3.5 (according to the combine report I saw).

Per NBA.com Draft Combine measurements:

Donte DiVincenzo SG 5.00% (body fat %) 6' 4.5"(w/o shoes) 200.6 (weight) 6' 6" (w/shoes) 42.0 (vert)

Gotta go by shoe measurement, they don't play barefooted in NBA.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,465
Reaction score
18,367
Location
The Giant Toaster
Per NBA.com Draft Combine measurements:

Donte DiVincenzo SG 5.00% (body fat %) 6' 4.5"(w/o shoes) 200.6 (weight) 6' 6" (w/shoes) 42.0 (vert)

Gotta go by shoe measurement, they don't play barefooted in NBA.

To accurately compare prospects they need to be barefoot.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
Per NBA.com Draft Combine measurements:

Donte DiVincenzo SG 5.00% (body fat %) 6' 4.5"(w/o shoes) 200.6 (weight) 6' 6" (w/shoes) 42.0 (vert)

Gotta go by shoe measurement, they don't play barefooted in NBA.

I've heard and disputed that reasoning for years. Yes, it's true, they don't play barefooted but a system that allows them to pretend to be inches taller than they really are is fundamentally flawed. And that's why they ALSO measure barefoot these days. NBADraft.net (and NBA.com/stats) shows Donte as 6'4.5 in shoes, 6'3.5 barefoot.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
I've heard and disputed that reasoning for years. Yes, it's true, they don't play barefooted but a system that allows them to pretend to be inches taller than they really are is fundamentally flawed. And that's why they ALSO measure barefoot these days. NBADraft.net (and NBA.com/stats) shows Donte as 6'4.5 in shoes, 6'3.5 barefoot.

The system is stupid, sure, but it's the system. No reason to take height from some players and not others. Unless we're talking KG or Durant, everyone in the league is listed an inch or two taller than their barefoot height. Alan Williams, for instance, measured at 6'7 at the combine.

I'm seeing the same 6'4.5 in shoes, 6'3.5 barefoot on Donte. He's not particularly long, either. He did, however, finish first in the entire field in both vertical leap tests.

https://thebiglead.com/2018/05/18/donte-divincenzo-combine-2018-nba-draft/
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
To accurately compare prospects they need to be barefoot.
To accurately compare prospects? If they are all measured in shoes then how is it not accurate? Are some guys wearing platforms?
I've heard and disputed that reasoning for years. Yes, it's true, they don't play barefooted but a system that allows them to pretend to be inches taller than they really are is fundamentally flawed. And that's why they ALSO measure barefoot these days. NBADraft.net (and NBA.com/stats) shows Donte as 6'4.5 in shoes, 6'3.5 barefoot.
You're right, I mistook wingspan for height w/shoes. But still 6'4.5 in shoes would still make him a good sized PG especially at 200 pounds in NBA standards.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
The system is stupid, sure, but it's the system. No reason to take height from some players and not others. Unless we're talking KG or Durant, everyone in the league is listed an inch or two taller than their barefoot height. Alan Williams, for instance, measured at 6'7 at the combine.

I'm seeing the same 6'4.5 in shoes, 6'3.5 barefoot on Donte. He's not particularly long, either. He did, however, finish first in the entire field in both vertical leap tests.

https://thebiglead.com/2018/05/18/donte-divincenzo-combine-2018-nba-draft/

Yeah but not all players get the same level of height inflation. I'd be fine with "in shoe" measurements if the shoes were standardized - if they were actually measured in the shoes they'd typically play in. But, through the years, some players have inflated their height by 3 inches or more while others have only padded it by a half inch.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
You're right, I mistook wingspan for height w/shoes. But still 6'4.5 in shoes would still make him a good sized PG especially at 200 pounds in NBA standards.

Yeah, I have no problem with his size if he can truly play the point.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
Yeah but not all players get the same level of height inflation. I'd be fine with "in shoe" measurements if the shoes were standardized - if they were actually measured in the shoes they'd typically play in. But, through the years, some players have inflated their height by 3 inches or more while others have only padded it by a half inch.
Really? Who did three inches?
 

CardsSunsDbacks

Not So Skeptical
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Posts
10,152
Reaction score
6,602
B/c you want their true height.
Cool story. Every player in the NBA (except maybe Durant) is going by their height in shoes and not barefoot. All that matters is that they are all going by the same measurement and they are because they all go by the height in shoes.
 

GatorAZ

feed hopkins
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Posts
25,465
Reaction score
18,367
Location
The Giant Toaster
Cool story. Every player in the NBA (except maybe Durant) is going by their height in shoes and not barefoot. All that matters is that they are all going by the same measurement and they are because they all go by the height in shoes.

I’m looking at the combine measurements from this year and guys with the same measurements *w/o shoes have different measurements *in shoes. It’s not by much obviously but why wouldn’t you want their natural height.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
Really? Who did three inches?

I think we'd have to go back a few decades to find 3 inch variance but even since they started measuring everyone at the combine there have been 1.5 to 2.25 inch differences between shoes and no shoes.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
Cool story. Every player in the NBA (except maybe Durant) is going by their height in shoes and not barefoot. All that matters is that they are all going by the same measurement and they are because they all go by the height in shoes.

Everyone gets measured now but the player heights that get used are typically the ones on the player card. I guess each team/player sort of prints up their own numbers. Granted, most players and even most people, are going to list themselves by their height in shoes. And it wouldn't be a problem if players were prevented from showing up in high heels.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

I'm excited about this workout! Zhaire Smith has been a target of mine for awhile now, and Okogie is the perfect foil and an intriguing prospect in his own right. He's also one of the most explosive athletes in the draft, so this should be a good way to gauge just how special Smith could be...or maybe find a sleeper in Okogie at 31.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Dan H

ASFN Addict
Banned from P+R
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
6,199
Reaction score
5,194
Location
Circle City, IN
Yeah but not all players get the same level of height inflation. I'd be fine with "in shoe" measurements if the shoes were standardized - if they were actually measured in the shoes they'd typically play in. But, through the years, some players have inflated their height by 3 inches or more while others have only padded it by a half inch.

Yup. Barkley was probably a hair over 6-4. He filmed the "parents should be role models" commercial at North High's old gym when I went there and he wasn't much taller than I was at that age, and I'm 6-4 now.

Don't think Jordan was 6-6, either.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,324
Bordow on where these players may go in the draft.

scott bordow‏Verified account@sbordow



Suns workout today. Smith is a potential pick at No. 16 for Suns. Okogie is rated low first-round, maybe slide to No. 31 pick.

10:38 AM - 16 Jun 2018
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
Do you think Okogie might be similar to Archie Goodwin since his shooting is not so good?

I can't say anything about Okogie but I certainly get the Goodwin vibe from Lonnie Walker who is frequently mocked to us at 16. But not every "Archie Goodwin" fails to develop like Archie did so Okogie or Walker might still be viable prospects.
 

AzStevenCal

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2004
Posts
36,758
Reaction score
16,525
Could be but someone should be there that is worthwhile. It's so hard to predict.

It sure is. But I wasn't really predicting he'd be gone so much as regretting that he would be. I really like him, Huerter or Donte at 16 (in that order). But the latter two especially, need to be closely scrutinized beyond simple basketball skills.
 
OP
OP
Mainstreet

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,028
Reaction score
58,324
I can't say anything about Okogie but I certainly get the Goodwin vibe from Lonnie Walker who is frequently mocked to us at 16. But not every "Archie Goodwin" fails to develop like Archie did so Okogie or Walker might still be viable prospects.

This may be where the Suns shouldn't get cute in the draft and draft a more proven player. I do like Knox if he is there. Walker has a lot of weaknesses.

http://www.tankathon.com/players/lonnie-walker

Selection #31 is a more gamble position but then I got all frustrated with the selection of Reed early in the 2nd round.

I guess it depends upon which player is there at each spot. I do like PG possibilities at #31.
 
Top