Zona90 said:I guess you're not a hockey fan. Have you heard of Jarome Iginla?
Ever heard of Dirk Nowitzki?
Zona90 said:I guess you're not a hockey fan. Have you heard of Jarome Iginla?
carey said:Not at all. I am very worried about his health. He has played in a wide open running game for almost 10 years. I'm afraid of what that has done to his body. However, I think he is a great fit for this team for the next 2 to 3 years, but he doesn't seem to be the long term solution that will put us over the top.
Chris_Sanders said:Ever heard of Dirk Nowitzki?
Zona90 said:It's a horrible signing because when was the last time a starting white point guard led his team to the NBA title?
Billythekid said:John Paxon player point in the Bulls 3 earlier titles...
Thing is... Amare will lead us to an NBA title(s). Nash will help... but Amare will lead.
Billythekid said:Paxson DID start for the Bulls. I think in 93 BJ might have gotten the start but 91 and 92 Paxson started and was a nice piece in the bulls puzzle.
I was responding to that stupid point about - 'when was the last time a white guy point guard led his team to a championship'... that comment is a pretty ******** sum up of the Nash signing.
Chaplin said:I was initially against the contract issue, but after reading all the posts today on the site, I've decided that maybe we are making a bigger deal about it than we probably should. Would I have liked the contract to be more managemeable? Sure, although we really don't know what the final numbers are--just a vague 65 million being mentioned.
But in the end, I watch the Suns (emphasis on WATCH) the Suns PLAY BASKETBALL. Period. I don't watch the Suns go out and buy a new scoreboard or negotiate with Kevin Willis. I watch them play basketball. And will signing Steve Nash improve my entertainment value of watching the Phoenix Suns play basketball?
Absolutely, no question about it.
And because of that, this signing has to be considered a success.
Chaplin said:I was initially against the contract issue, but after reading all the posts today on the site, I've decided that maybe we are making a bigger deal about it than we probably should. Would I have liked the contract to be more managemeable? Sure, although we really don't know what the final numbers are--just a vague 65 million being mentioned.
But in the end, I watch the Suns (emphasis on WATCH) the Suns PLAY BASKETBALL. Period. I don't watch the Suns go out and buy a new scoreboard or negotiate with Kevin Willis. I watch them play basketball. And will signing Steve Nash improve my entertainment value of watching the Phoenix Suns play basketball?
Absolutely, no question about it.
And because of that, this signing has to be considered a success.
This whole argument is stupid. Its like saying why would you sign Yao Ming. When did a chinese center ever lead a club to the finals.cheesebeef said:you're kidding here right? You're claiming that Paxson was the bulls POINT GUARD - hell I don't think he was even starting for their first three titles.
You're right about Amare - it's got to be him and sadly it looks like him alone - everyone else on this club IMO is soft.
sly fly said:It also makes me sick.
How in the hell can some of you NOT like this move??? Damn, perhaps some of you really don't know anything about good ball???
Leave the "white" comments out of this. That pisses me off.