Please tell me that last sequence of two missed shots by Booker (you know, the missed three and the quick rebound of it) wasn't a reversion to hero-ball. I would be incredibly disappointed in him; I would conclude that he's as much a bonehead as Amare Stoudemire, and that he learns nothing no matter how many games he ruins with hero-ball.
yes, and, like Amare, what Booker needs is a ticket to NY where he will thrill them for a few years and not win anything - instead of it being us for a full 60 years.
this game was a perfect case in point.
Booker was hot and the team played with confidence (when he's not, they typically don't)
but again, they blew it in the last 3 minutes playing Booker ball.
again, and again, he takes a wild 3pt shot when we only need 1 to win.
i don't care so much when his shot is off. i care that his head is consistently off in crunch time.
we were #1 in closing games under CP3's leadership and #1 this season with Durant leading close-outs
and we were
historically last in closeouts last season when it was "Booker's team" and he was playing point
apparently, coach's haven't got the guts to call the shots. The color-analyst pointed out that we played 2 man ball with Booker the last 7 plays despite moving the ball well and scoring before that.
there will surely be post's complaining that anyone could criticize our "home-grown" star after carrying the team on his back to a near victory with 44 points. If they haven't learned from last season and the end of the prior season, they'll learn this season.
it doesn't really matter who scores and how many. It's about results. Amare's nickname was "Stat" and Booker is another stat guy who you will never see hoist up the ball from half-court at the end of quarters. I'd trade him today for Jalen Brunson if the Knicks would take the deal.