xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
This stat isn’t even close to being right.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
This stat isn’t even close to being right.
MJ had 8 games in 1986-87 alone where he scored 50 or more and he was only 23 at that point.
Michael Jordan 1986-87 Game Log | Basketball-Reference.com
Get Michael Jordan's 1986-87 game by game stats along with wins and losses stats on Basketball-Reference.comwww.basketball-reference.com
He had something like 25 50 point games by the time he was Book’s age.
Tell me this doesn't sound legit...
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
Not bad for a guy that is over the hill and completely done playing good basketball. I was always very skeptical of the idea that he suddenly hit some sort of wall and thought he was just having a slow start.xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
More likely last night was a fluke.Not bad for a guy that is over the hill and completely done playing good basketball. I was always very skeptical of the idea that he suddenly hit some sort of wall and thought he was just having a slow start.
I think he's clearly in decline but at least he's declining from the pinacle of his profession. I'm hoping though that he can still play like he did the season before where he would turn back the hands of time for a few minutes in the 4th quarter. But with his various injuries, some that seem to still linger (hand, wrist etc.) it's sometimes tough to distinguish between decline and injury.More likely last night was a fluke.
With old stars they still have 1 offs every now and then where they look like their old selves.
Of course I hope I am wrong, but I have seen a lot more bad play from him recently than good, and I think it is wishful thinking to think the old CP3 is suddenly back.
He has been good for 5 of the last 6 games. This lends itself more to the idea that he was getting his legs underneath him.More likely last night was a fluke.
With old stars they still have 1 offs every now and then where they look like their old selves.
Of course I hope I am wrong, but I have seen a lot more bad play from him recently than good, and I think it is wishful thinking to think the old CP3 is suddenly back.
I don't think it's right. Shamet is shooting .368 from three last season and .363 this season.
He has made 33 three's this season alone.
I know it wasn't accurate but it sure feels that way watching him. He's off far more than he's on. I'll give him credit for stepping up when he's needed to start in place of Booker but outside of those games he's been a disappointment. I did like the PG experiment in the playoffs and wouldn't mind seeing Monty try doing that more often but with Cam Payne seemingly returning to form, PG minutes aren't available for an experiment.
Ah. I hate stats that limit records for completely arbitrary reasons.On top of the graphic it says “since 2000“.
I think the best we can hope for is he’s able to play the same role Jason Kidd played for that 2011 Mavs club. Make smart play, hit timely 3s and just be a calming presence on the court.I think he's clearly in decline but at least he's declining from the pinacle of his profession. I'm hoping though that he can still play like he did the season before where he would turn back the hands of time for a few minutes in the 4th quarter. But with his various injuries, some that seem to still linger (hand, wrist etc.) it's sometimes tough to distinguish between decline and injury.
And then the Washington clunker hit.Not bad for a guy that is over the hill and completely done playing good basketball. I was always very skeptical of the idea that he suddenly hit some sort of wall and thought he was just having a slow start.
I think it has a lot to do with the 2nd of a back to back. Recovering overnight becomes much more difficult as you get older. Fortunately we don't play a ton of those.And then the Washington clunker hit.
He’s not “done,” he just can’t bring the highest level consistently enough right now. Age does eventually catch up to even the greats.
To be fair "since 2000" isn't that arbitrary since it includes the last 22 years which isn't insignificant. That last 20 years of anything is pretty significant. I get what you are saying though. Those stats they throw out there like this that have some arbitrary time frames are really annoying. Those and the ones where they include like 10 qualifying circumstances.Ah. I hate stats that limit records for completely arbitrary reasons.
I'm one of Mikal's biggest supporters here and of course I'd make that deal. I'm pretty sure that's true of most of us but the question becomes what else would we have to include to make it happen.Siakam 52/9/7 last night still wouldn’t trade Bridges for him.
I'm sure there'd be some interest in CamJ but considering his injury history and the fact he's finishing out his current contract, I can't imagine he'd bring back much in return.After the SSuns sale closes (I accept that that's what's holding up deals) I wonder if anyone would want Cameron Johnson based on how he can probably play when healthy. The need for a tall forward who rebounds is so desperate that if someone offered one in exchange for Johnson, I would listen if the offer wasn't insulting on its face.
The second reason to be willing to trade Cameron Johnson is money. How are the Suns supposed to eventually shell out another max?