Again, read the OP. If you feel that way, fine. Im just replying to the initial thought process. We can agree to disagree if you think our WR/pass catchers are already in that realm.
I certainly DID NOT forget that. Its why I said I would love to add Wirfs is he results in an above average line. Same with Brown on the Dline. Hell if that were the case, I would gladly take either over Lamb. You are picking and choosing battles here based on 1/3 of people's posts.
Additionally, selecting a WR at 8 is not "at the expense of all other areas of the team." Yes, its our best opportunity to select the best player we can, at any position. However, one pick is not sacrificing all other positions throughout. Its sacrificing one pick towards "hopefully" stacking a position group, instead of what can be debated is a bigger need elsewhere. Which then circles back to the OP and my original post exploring what a "potentially" stacked WR/pass catching grouping would look like and how it impacts our offense and Murray's development vs. what Wirf/ect or Brown/ect on defense.
See, now there we go. Lets actually discuss the ramifications. It is a legitimate point, which is why I would love to select Wirfs, et al. and them develop into the Olineman we have been searching for for decades. The counter would be, would K2 be able to adapt his offense enough to offset the impact of a potentially poor line, or teams blitzing like crazy by getting the ball out quickly to Nuk, Fitz and Lamb? What do we think Murray's development looks like with Wirfs at G or RT vs. Lamb in the WR corps? I have no idea, but its an interesting contrast and belief system on how to take advantage of Murray's skills.
Again, read my posts. Im not, and have never, said that. Im discussing the possibility, which you seem to find difficult to comprehend, because you dont even want to consider the thought. Thats fine. But if so, lets move along and perhaps lets others debate the thought process instead.
