The 2017-2018 Around the NBA thread

Phrazbit

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
20,369
Reaction score
11,467
We can give them Monroe, the Milwaukee pick and the Miami pick and all our second round picks

for

Frye, Shump and the Nets pick.

If LeBron walks this summer, they can retool with three first rounders and three second rounders.

I don't see why that makes them much better right now or in the future.

They need to strike gold on that Nets pick, I don't see them giving it up unless it is for a high caliber player. That trade gives them quantity over quality... but in the NBA that formula does not fly. You'd rather have 1 all-star than 5 role players, and I really doubt they'd get close to 5 role players out of that deal.

I also do not think they're under achieving. On paper that team might look good, but it is basically LeBron (still probably the most complete player in the league), Love, a primier stretch 4... and a bunch of steaming hot garbage. Thomas has barely played and he's been awful when he has.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
Well. Eric. Its beginning to look like you were right about Randle.
 

Errntknght

Registered User
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Posts
6,342
Reaction score
319
Location
Phoenix
Well. Eric. Its beginning to look like you were right about Randle.

How far back in time does this refer to? I know Randle has started recently and seems to be contributing a lot. He's not starting at C but he's got to be manning the postition some of the time - there was some debate about Randle playing C a while back...
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
How far back in time does this refer to? I know Randle has started recently and seems to be contributing a lot. He's not starting at C but he's got to be manning the postition some of the time - there was some debate about Randle playing C a while back...

It was earlier this season, before Randle was starting. There were a few of us who said we'd still prefer Bender or Chriss. Looks like Eric was right.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,549
Reaction score
9,839
Location
L.A. area
It was earlier this season, before Randle was starting. There were a few of us who said we'd still prefer Bender or Chriss. Looks like Eric was right.

Well, in fairness, I was watching him play. Maybe it's fool's gold, but to me, he doesn't warrant the "low ceiling" talk. That was the main point of disagreement.
 

Cheesebeef

ASFN IDOL
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Posts
92,208
Reaction score
70,487
We can give them Monroe, the Milwaukee pick and the Miami pick and all our second round picks

for

Frye, Shump and the Nets pick.

If LeBron walks this summer, they can retool with three first rounders and three second rounders.

Jesus.

First, we were gonna get the Brooklyn pick for Bledsoe... now, we’re going to get it for Greg Monroe and a bunch late first round picks?

Come the f on... again.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
Jesus.

First, we were gonna get the Brooklyn pick for Bledsoe... now, we’re going to get it for Greg Monroe and a bunch late first round picks?

Come the f on... again.
Just Suns fans here. Not seriously proposing this anywhere. Its more of a harball offer type thing.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,392
Reaction score
219
Location
Budapest,Hungary
Pardon me, but what is that impressive in a 4th-year player making 17/9 (with questionable defense I guess) for a bad team in a few games? Even if he keeps that until the season ends?

How does that justify that we should trade a younger, cheaper prospect for him at this stage of Suns' rebuilding?
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
Jesus.

First, we were gonna get the Brooklyn pick for Bledsoe... now, we’re going to get it for Greg Monroe and
Jesus.

First, we were gonna get the Brooklyn pick for Bledsoe... now, we’re going to get it for Greg Monroe and a bunch late first round picks?

Come the f on... again.

A couple of things. I do not believe I suggested the Brooklyn pick for Bledsoe, just that Cleveland probably should have tried to get Bledsoe when he was available. He would be better for them than what they have right now.

Second. I am not advocating knocking on Cleveland's door with an offer. They need a center. We have one. Their fans (on other boards) think we should give him to them and take back whatever bad contracts they have out of the goodness of our hearts. Frankly, I would just rather have the extra $17 million on our books this summer. Cleveland has one trade piece anyone wants. Its that Brooklyn pick.

Third. I am not as high on that Brooklyn pick as many are. Its probably going to b a 9-10 pick in this draft. If Cleveland does trade it, it will probably be with protections. So, basically its one of the Bridges or Wendell Carter or something.
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,115
Reaction score
6,551
Pardon me, but what is that impressive in a 4th-year player making 17/9 (with questionable defense I guess) for a bad team in a few games? Even if he keeps that until the season ends?

How does that justify that we should trade a younger, cheaper prospect for him at this stage of Suns' rebuilding?
Since just before Christmas he has been producing pretty consistently. He is beginning to look like a legit starting pf. His team is also winning more. He was also available. He has been significantly better than Chriss or Bender.

And 17/9 are decent numbers. We would be very happy to have that from either of our young forwards. When ELindholm brought him up (in November I think) we all sort of dismissed Randle as a bust. Randle is turning out to be more than we thought.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,366
Reaction score
59,974
Third. I am not as high on that Brooklyn pick as many are. Its probably going to b a 9-10 pick in this draft. If Cleveland does trade it, it will probably be with protections. So, basically its one of the Bridges or Wendell Carter or something.

A 9-10 pick in this draft is not a bad thing if it were ever on the table.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,642
Reaction score
12,865
Location
Tempe, AZ
David Blatt tried throwing some shade at Cleveland after they lost to the Thunder with the score being 148-124. He said he hoped his team doesn't allow as many points as the Cav's did against the Thunder while he was coaching a Team Europe vs Team Asia All-Star game. Then Team Europe gave up 151 points in a loss. At least that was an All-Star game though. Blatt would be a better coach for the Cav's than Tyronn Lue has been the last year and a half.

http://nba.nbcsports.com/2018/01/21...ers-backfires-when-opponent-scores-151-video/
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Since just before Christmas he has been producing pretty consistently. He is beginning to look like a legit starting pf. His team is also winning more. He was also available. He has been significantly better than Chriss or Bender.

And 17/9 are decent numbers. We would be very happy to have that from either of our young forwards. When ELindholm brought him up (in November I think) we all sort of dismissed Randle as a bust. Randle is turning out to be more than we thought.

Yeah, exactly. I would be jumping up and down and doing a happy dance if Chriss or Bender averaged 17 and 9.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,192
Reaction score
59,227
Location
SoCal
Since just before Christmas he has been producing pretty consistently. He is beginning to look like a legit starting pf. His team is also winning more. He was also available. He has been significantly better than Chriss or Bender.

And 17/9 are decent numbers. We would be very happy to have that from either of our young forwards. When ELindholm brought him up (in November I think) we all sort of dismissed Randle as a bust. Randle is turning out to be more than we thought.
I didn’t dismiss him. I’ve always kinda liked randle.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,392
Reaction score
219
Location
Budapest,Hungary
Yeah, exactly. I would be jumping up and down and doing a happy dance if Chriss or Bender averaged 17 and 9.

Cool. All you have to do is waiting for 2 years and then we all will see if Bender or Chriss averaged 17/9. After that we can compare that to what Randle have averaged in those 2 years.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,549
Reaction score
9,839
Location
L.A. area
Cool. All you have to do is waiting for 2 years and then we all will see if Bender or Chriss averaged 17/9. After that we can compare that to what Randle have averaged in those 2 years.

If Bender is averaging 17 and 9 in two years, it will be the most wrong I have ever been about any young player ever. Almost all he does is shoot threes, so he'd have to be making 5 per game, and right now he's lucky to get 9 rebounds in a week.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I am a huge Bender fan, but I don't see 17 and 9 in his future. I am hoping for it, but if I were a betting man, I'd bet against 17 and 9.
 

hcsilla

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Posts
3,392
Reaction score
219
Location
Budapest,Hungary
If Bender is averaging 17 and 9 in two years, it will be the most wrong I have ever been about any young player ever. Almost all he does is shoot threes, so he'd have to be making 5 per game, and right now he's lucky to get 9 rebounds in a week.

:), yes, it doesn't seem likely. However, the jury is still out and the Suns are not in a hurry since they still lack core players.

However, let's calm down a bit and see how long can Randle keep 17/9, if he can at all.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,366
Reaction score
59,974
If Bender is averaging 17 and 9 in two years, it will be the most wrong I have ever been about any young player ever. Almost all he does is shoot threes, so he'd have to be making 5 per game, and right now he's lucky to get 9 rebounds in a week.

I knew Bender had 8 rebounds in the Nuggets game so I had to look it up. :wink2:

Bender has averaged 7 rebounds in his last 5 games.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,497
Reaction score
4,913
Location
Harrisburg, PA
I knew Bender had 8 rebounds in the Nuggets game so I had to look it up. :wink2:

Bender has averaged 7 rebounds in his last 5 games.

I noticed his rebounding the last two games, but I did not realize he's been rebounding for five games. His rebounding was non-existent there for a while. He can already shoot and defend. Being able to rebound consistently, even if it's only 7-8 per game would be huge for him. I hope he can keep it up!
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
119,366
Reaction score
59,974
I noticed his rebounding the last two games, but I did not realize he's been rebounding for five games. His rebounding was non-existent there for a while. He can already shoot and defend. Being able to rebound consistently, even if it's only 7-8 per game would be huge for him. I hope he can keep it up!

Now let's hope Bender can keep his rebounding numbers up. It would be a huge improvement if he can do it.

@elindholm was mostly right about Bender's rebounding deficiencies except for the past 5 games. :)

http://www.espn.com/nba/player/gamelog/_/id/4011991/dragan-bender
 
Top