The 2017-2018 Around the NBA thread

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
What exactly has Bender done that Randle couldn’t?

Defend, for one thing. While Bender makes some mistakes, you can see that he is already a good defender. Doesn't quite have the strength to bang with the bigs in the low post, but his defensive technique is flawless. He does an excellent job leveraging his height, foot speed, and length to stay in front of players and still challenge shots. He keeps his arms straight up and most of the time, doesn't fall for pump-fakes.

He is a much better shooter, and a better passer, even though his assist numbers probably don't reflect that just yet. He is just a much smarter basketball player.

I have nothing against Randle. As the matter of fact, I rather like him, but his size is just OK for a power forward and not enough for a Center. Bender is incredibly quick and fluid for someone his size, and he is over seven feet tall. You can't teach of develop that. If he can be a consistent 35%-40% three-point shooter, he WILL be a better player than Randle. He is a kid who just turned 20. Randle is a grown man. I am not saying it is impossible for Randle to improve significantly, but I am saying that Bender is more likely to improve significantly and that Randle doesn't have the physical tools that Bender has. Again, that's not a knock on Randle- I like him.
 

Raze

Suns fan since '89
Joined
May 20, 2017
Posts
626
Reaction score
599
Location
Arizona
Defend, for one thing. While Bender makes some mistakes, you can see that he is already a good defender. Doesn't quite have the strength to bang with the bigs in the low post, but his defensive technique is flawless. He does an excellent job leveraging his height, foot speed, and length to stay in front of players and still challenge shots. He keeps his arms straight up and most of the time, doesn't fall for pump-fakes.

He is a much better shooter, and a better passer, even though his assist numbers probably don't reflect that just yet. He is just a much smarter basketball player.

I have nothing against Randle. As the matter of fact, I rather like him, but his size is just OK for a power forward and not enough for a Center. Bender is incredibly quick and fluid for someone his size, and he is over seven feet tall. You can't teach of develop that. If he can be a consistent 35%-40% three-point shooter, he WILL be a better player than Randle. He is a kid who just turned 20. Randle is a grown man. I am not saying it is impossible for Randle to improve significantly, but I am saying that Bender is more likely to improve significantly and that Randle doesn't have the physical tools that Bender has. Again, that's not a knock on Randle- I like him.

One thing to add about Bender: the dude has heart. One of the hardest things to measure in a prospect is heart. Bender shows it on the court, constantly. Whether it's after he hits a three or when he tries to lock down a G on D, the dude goes all out. Anybody watch Ball or Fultz play and wonder if they even want to be out there?

That's what I love about Booker, Bender, and Jackson: I don't question their desire to be great. I love how they put it all on the line for their team. In 5 years, if they are still together, they should be a team that garners a ton of respect.
 

95pro

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 10, 2007
Posts
12,675
Reaction score
4,152
Bender’s technique on defense is solid. But does he ever block or alter shots? He does all the right things but it seems he still gets taken to the hoop.

For all his height, length and foot speed that everyone here praises him on, it would seem he would have more of an impact on the overall game.

He is shooting better and with more confidence though.

And what’s with the mask? Hearing it’s precautionary? That’s weird to me, they all get banged around during the game. Seems like a mental thing to me.
 

SirStefan32

Krycek, Alex Krycek
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
18,494
Reaction score
4,905
Location
Harrisburg, PA
Bender’s technique on defense is solid. But does he ever block or alter shots? He does all the right things but it seems he still gets taken to the hoop.

For all his height, length and foot speed that everyone here praises him on, it would seem he would have more of an impact on the overall game.

He is shooting better and with more confidence though.

And what’s with the mask? Hearing it’s precautionary? That’s weird to me, they all get banged around during the game. Seems like a mental thing to me.

I heard EJ/ K-Ray say that he broke his nose against the Rockets.

As to his shot-blocking/ altering, a quick YouTube search yielded some results.
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,013
Reaction score
58,301
So. All this discussion about Tatum or Jackson. Here is the issue. How do we learn from that and apply it to next summer's draft. How do you determine who will succeed and who will buts.

There is just something that tends to grab scouts and fans about raw athleticism--and length too.

I think athleticism and length are fine but the player drafted needs to have a concrete skill as well. Markkanen is an excellent shooter which should have given him a boost in the draft. The same with Tatum. He had solid offensive skills.

Fultz missed part of his freshmen season because of a supposed injury. Ball and Jackson are still working on their shooting.

IMO, too much banking on the upside of a player early in the draft instead of tangible skills. Teams are afraid of missing on the next potential star so they let good players slide.
 

elindholm

edited for content
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
27,488
Reaction score
9,699
Location
L.A. area
I'd say that poor shooting is a huge warning sign. It's very difficult for a player to succeed in today's NBA if he can't shoot. They don't all have to be able to shoot three-pointers, but they at least have to have a good enough technique to be able to shoot decently from the line. You'll see the occasional big man who gets away with not being able to shoot free throws, but the list of NBA wings who survive with a FT% of 60% or lower -- which is where Jackson hangs out -- is very short. It's not so much the points they give up at the line, but the fact that a very low FT% indicates a serious mechanical flaw in the general shooting stroke.
 

Raze

Suns fan since '89
Joined
May 20, 2017
Posts
626
Reaction score
599
Location
Arizona
I'd say that poor shooting is a huge warning sign. It's very difficult for a player to succeed in today's NBA if he can't shoot. They don't all have to be able to shoot three-pointers, but they at least have to have a good enough technique to be able to shoot decently from the line. You'll see the occasional big man who gets away with not being able to shoot free throws, but the list of NBA wings who survive with a FT% of 60% or lower -- which is where Jackson hangs out -- is very short. It's not so much the points they give up at the line, but the fact that a very low FT% indicates a serious mechanical flaw in the general shooting stroke.

This is true. That's mostly because some prospects are so arrogant they think can just show up and it'll all work out. Ball is one such. The Lakers actually said they won't alter his shot. I sure hope they don't. He needs to keep shooting that horrendous shot of his.

LeBron is one exception to the rule. He came in with an awful shot. I didn't think it was correctable, but heart always wins out. He's a shining example of what building confidence and working hard on form will net you.

Karl Malone came into the league with an awful shot as well. The Mailman put in some hard work and became a dominant force on both the mid range jumpers and the free throw line.

Josh has already proven that he's trying to correct his shot. His form is vastly different than 7 months ago. It's still mechanical, but it's a huge step in the right direction. It'll take time. I'm just glad to see he isn't an arrogant fool who thinks he doesn't need to work on his craft.
 

ColdPickleNachos

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 5, 2016
Posts
2,578
Reaction score
1,659
https://deadspin.com/giannis-antetokounmpo-shouts-ill-fudge-you-up-at-bucks-1820748989

Probably not a big deal, but I would not be upset if he took a cue from his new teammate. A Giannis trade would only mean good things for our Bucks draft pick!
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,579
Reaction score
66,160
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547

JCSunsfan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 24, 2002
Posts
22,114
Reaction score
6,547
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
I can understand this from his perspective. He will be a free agent. Lack of playing time costs him money. If he wants a buyout, he has to give up a lot of dough to get Philly to do it.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
118,013
Reaction score
58,301
If the Suns had room on their roster a 2nd round draft pick would be a small price. They have a bunch of 2nd round picks.
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,579
Reaction score
66,160
Location
Crowley, TX
and then there is this from Booker....
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 
OP
OP
Ronin

Ronin

Wut?
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
144,579
Reaction score
66,160
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Krangodnzr

Captain of Team Conner
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
36,490
Reaction score
34,466
Location
Charlotte, NC
I'd take him.

It could work out three ways:

1. He sucks and we get an extended audition and he helps with lottery balls
2. He's meh and he doesn't push the needle at all and we lose a 2nd rounder
3. Solid player and we hopefully get a better chance at keeping him.
 

Hoop Head

ASFN Icon
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Posts
17,364
Reaction score
12,540
Location
Tempe, AZ
Philly is crazy thinking they could get 2 1st round picks for a rental whose bird rights don't transfer, even if they did transfer that's really high for someone who hasn't shown much at the NBA level that they don't want, and will be a free agent at year's end. I think the 76'ers might get a 2nd rounder from someone who isn't the Celtics or Boston though. The reason a team moves a 2nd rounder is so they don't have to compete with Boston or Cleveland to sign him.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,647
Posts
5,409,876
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top