There is only one Golden State. Nobody has had sustained similar success being built like them because there is only one Steph Curry. The other teams not named Golden State that have one recently had Giannis, Loenard. Hell LeBron sort of plays the forward positions interchangeably and he won it with Cleveland. Before that it was the Spurs.This isn't the 90's, it's not even the early 2000's. Bigs don't win titles. Who was the Center for the Warriors last year? The Celtics rolled out Horford's remains and made it to the Finals also. We aren't winning a title with Ayton because of Ayton. What he provides can be done by committee. We've seen that when he's missed time. We have a unicorn in KD now so relying on Ayton to make a leap isn't necessary either. I think Simons makes for a better 3rd star than Ayton does. Nurkic and Biz can guard the paint.
To be clear, I am not saying having a big is the be all end all but IMO you are way better off having a legit big then running it by committee with a bunch of scrubs. The Suns have been looking to solidify the PF spot FOREVER. Lakers look completely different with a healthy AD. The Mavs get beat up in the inside on a regular basis. Denver even with Joker seems to struggle when teams have a legit big man playing against him.
IMO, it would be incredibly stupid to trade Ayton for a guard IMO unless you think KD is going to be here for the rest of his career. Maybe you could run a little more by committee. If this is a short window? I want a FC player in return for any trade with him.
Last edited: