This loss is on Warner 100%!
You cannot even begin to justify it otherwise, don't even try!
Come to the DARKSIDE!
Embrace it.
You cannot even begin to justify it otherwise, don't even try!
Come to the DARKSIDE!
Embrace it.
This loss is on Warner 100%!
You cannot even begin to justify it otherwise, don't even try!
Come to the DARKSIDE!
Embrace it.
I'm not on the darkside now or probably for years.
The truth is we have the talent to fix this and coaching to match that, no matter how bad it gets and this season could go wrong, we'll not be going back to the one heartbeat pit of darkness and for that I am thankfull.
Perspective is key, now when it's terrible you have to realize, Clancy is gone, and Wells is here and our backup is Matt L.
That's not true darkness, it's not even close to fielding a punter as your QB.
I'm not on the darkside now or probably for years.
The truth is we have the talent to fix this and coaching to match that, no matter how bad it gets and this season could go wrong, we'll not be going back to the one heartbeat pit of darkness and for that I am thankfull.
Perspective is key, now when it's terrible you have to realize, Clancy is gone, and Wells is here and our backup is Matt L.
That's not true darkness, it's not even close to fielding a punter as your QB.
I was in the camp that the Cards should never have tried to re-sign Warner when he went to SF. The should have let the 9ers sign him. But since the Cards caved to that ridiculous contract, they have to let him start. He should be on a VERY SHORT leash though and if he continues to play like he has all four preason games and tonday and the Cards are 0-3 after the Colts game (I don't believe they will be), then Wiz seriously needs to consider starting the Leinart era for good. No more duel QB crap. Make Leinart the starter so they can see what they have. There are some good QB's coming out this year.
I agree, to a point. I don't believe in sitting a guy due to a bad regular season game. IF Warner totally bombs next week in JAX, I may change my mind, but right now I think the perfect time to do a switch would be the bye week. I would give ML a whole week with the 1st team.I'm not talking about Tom Tupa and I hope you're not comparing Matt Lienart to him.
So, we should give up almost a quarter of our season to realize what is blatantly obvious? At that point the season is over.
I agree, to a point. I don't believe in sitting a guy due to a bad regular season game. IF Warner totally bombs next week in JAX, I may change my mind, but right now I think the perfect time to do a switch would be the bye week. I would give ML a whole week with the 1st team.
I agree. You don't give a guy $12 million and then bench him after one game, no matter how badly he played.
You do if you play to win. Even more "especially" if the guy is 38 years old.
Yup, even though we may feel differently, realistically I don't see Warner getting benched until week 6 or 7 if at all.Then we never should have paid him in the first place. But we did because we thought he had a couple of good years in him, and maybe he does.
Kurt was supposedly finished in St. Louis and New York also. Hell, he led us to the Super Bowl not even a year ago.
Regardless, Whiz isn't benching him next week, so the point is moot.
Then we never should have paid him in the first place. But we did because we thought he had a couple of good years in him, and maybe he does.
Kurt was supposedly finished in St. Louis and New York also. Hell, he led us to the Super Bowl not even a year ago.
Regardless, Whiz isn't benching him next week, so the point is moot.
Then we never should have paid him in the first place. But we did because we thought he had a couple of good years in him, and maybe he does.Kurt was supposedly finished in St. Louis and New York also. Hell, he led us to the Super Bowl not even a year ago.
Regardless, Whiz isn't benching him next week, so the point is moot.
Who's Matt Lienart? At least get his name right. If you think Matt Leinart would have done any better that is probably wrong. Matt had his chance to win me over against Denver and he looked worse than Kurt if anything. Even that 2nd half where he led the Cardinals back mostly against the 2nd team defense of the Packers he had a pick and should have had two and had to recover two of his fumbles. That doesn't sound like the QB I'd want to go with right now either.I'm not talking about Tom Tupa and I hope you're not comparing Matt Lienart to him.
Then we never should have paid him in the first place. But we did because we thought he had a couple of good years in him, and maybe he does.Kurt was supposedly finished in St. Louis and New York also. Hell, he led us to the Super Bowl not even a year ago.
Regardless, Whiz isn't benching him next week, so the point is moot.
Yup. No way do you give a 38 year old QB that type of $$$ regardless of what he did. What pisses me off more is they took care of Warner for one good season, yet drag thier feet with Dansby, Q and to a lesser extent Dockett. If they lose any of those guys this offseason because they overpaid a bloated contract to Warner and have no cash to take care of those three I will be freaking rip sh-t.Lets get this straight. The Cards paid Warner purely for PR purposes. Nothing more.
Who's Matt Lienart? At least get his name right. If you think Matt Leinart would have done any better that is probably wrong. Matt had his chance to win me over against Denver and he looked worse than Kurt if anything. Even that 2nd half where he led the Cardinals back mostly against the 2nd team defense of the Packers he had a pick and should have had two and had to recover two of his fumbles. That doesn't sound like the QB I'd want to go with right now either.
Kurt Warner had a terrible 1st half no doubt, but I'm feeling a bit more confident in him right now with the way he came out and played the 2nd half. It was too little too late for sure, but maybe the 2nd half will prove to be enough to get him back on track. Things will be better next week @Jacksonville.
If my 2nd paragraph isn't accepting reality, what is? Thinking Leinart would do any better probably isn't accepting reality either. Again with the attacking on my name?Why don't you go cozy up to you Whiner buddy?
Instead of being a Warner apologist, why not accept reality!
Oh, wait a minute. I guess your name says it all!
If my 2nd paragraph isn't accepting reality, what is? Thinking Leinart would do any better probably isn't accepting reality either. Again with the attacking on my name?
+1Let me tell you about reality my friend!
I have been on this board from day one! Long after you and Kurt are gone I will still be here
You have been here less than a year. The one and only reason you are is because of Warner.
Kurt Warner is not the ARIZONA CARDINALS!
That's who I support, The Arizona Cardinals.
Not just Kurt Warner!
Can you say the same Iowa Warner Fan?