nashman
ASFN Icon
After watching Amare last night I am starting to believe he has a foot out the door already!
Go for it.
2004-5 Playoffs:
Game 1 - 27 points, 10 asst, 8 rebounds
Game 3 - 36 points, 10 asst, 9 rebounds
2005-6 Playoffs:
Basically the entire playoffs where he averaged 29.6 ppg, 7 rebounds, 5 asst.
Here's the link for all the monster games he had that year... which led to his team being SWEPT in the 2nd round.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3248/gamelog;_ylt=AgJA0342lSVWtrqucVpAEhU5PKB4?year=2005
They're the same type of player... guys who play no defense who put up gaudy stats that make very little impact and quit on their teams.
Whoa, Vince Carter is better than I thought.
Barkley had the line of the night last night:
Q: What do you call a power forward who gets 3 rebounds?
A: A small forward.
i love that people on here are discounting malone b/c he played with stockton while ignoring the fact that amare is playing with nash. hilarious.
just this morning i heard an unbiased host talking about how much poorer of an offensive player amare would be without nash. and while i don't necessarily concur with that point, i think it's equally silly to make the pg argument about one of these guys without making it about the other.
btw, for whomever said the jazz never had any additional offensive firepower around malone, you're wrong. horny was a serious offensive threat, as was thurl bailey in his time, and bryon russell.
these arguments are grasping at straws. i figure those on here that are arguing that amare is a better offensive player than was malone are younger and didn't really have an opportunity to watch the mailman in his prime. malone is still considered in the argument for best PF of all time. amare wouldn't (yet) be mentioned in that conversation.
People are taking my comment about rather having Amare on this team right now vs Malone and equating that to mean that Amare is the superior player. That's not what I said at all.
whoa... you said you'd rather have Amare on this team than an in his prime Karl Malone? That lunacy DCR. Malone would be boarding, and throwing Gasol around like a rag-doll. He'd also be drawing fouls on their bigs like crazy, not to mention knowing when to throw a pass and when not to throw a pass like Amare did TWICE to Nash, under the basket surrounded by 3 7 footers, just a couple amongst the volume of ridiculously stupid plays he made last night and almost always makes.
And before you say Malone wouldn't do it against this front-line, Malone KILLED the Lakers front line of Shaq and Elden Campbell back in the day REPEATEDLY. Those were two HUGE 7-footers and Malone would punish the hell out of them on offense and rebound like a mother.
OFFENSIVELY only. I think this is being lost in translation.
OFFENSIVELY only. I think this is being lost in translation.
OFFENSIVELY only. I think this is being lost in translation.
I'll be in the minority on this and that's fine. It's the 'in' thing to do; being down on Amare. I'm down on his defensive performance too. It is unexcusable.
It's the 'in' thing to do; being down on Amare.
Huh, again, I'm talking about Amare. I didn't say it wasn't about Malone.this isn't about the "in" thing to do to say that Karl Malone,
one of the greatest PF of all time
I'll disagree here and raise you with Duncan.and probably the greatest OFFENSIVE PF of all time,
is better than Amare at, well, every facet of the game.
You really think this is a popularity thing, and not a performance thing? Defensively he's been atrocious, we can all agree on that. Offensively, he's been passive, and of little threat to the Lakers in terms of demanding double teams or drawing fouls.
Any way you cut it, he's been more of a liability than an asset on the floor, and for the life of me, I can't understand why Gentry didn't bring in Lopez to guard Gasol in the 4th. He was just dominating Amare on every possession, which forced the Suns to double and help, and the defense completely broke down.
Dcr, you are whacked.
Any way you cut it, he's been more of a liability than an asset on the floor, and for the life of me, I can't understand why Gentry didn't bring in Lopez to guard Gasol in the 4th.
but aren't we seeing how limited Amare is offensively right now? Whenever he faces ANY kind of decent size, his offensive game shrivels up. He's a non-factor out there... just as he was against Portland and for large portions of the SA series.
You are 100% correct!
The problem Amare faces when playing front lines with size, is that he has ZERO back to the basket game. He fronts players every single time he catches the ball and either shoots a 15 foot jump shot or drives to the hole.
The Lakers pack the paint which basically takes away the drive every time. Max players or leaders would figure out a way to impact the game other then scoring. Problem for Amare, is scoring is 100% of his game...take that away and he is worthless.
I'm not disagreeing. He was horrible defensively. Where did you ever thing that I was defending him defensively?
That's not true or fair. Amare has had his way with Camby, Duncan, Howard, Yao etc in the past. The Portland series, Amare was sometimes the 3rd or 4th option. He played very well offensively.