The Fun has Begun

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,255
Reaction score
8,274
Location
Scottsdale
Pat Tillman had a bunch of tackles, and that didn't make him a good player. It just meant that he had a terrible defense in front of him. Of course, one reason that Bucannon had more INTs than Dix and Pryor is that Bucannon was a senior and the other two were underclassmen.

Did Tillman lead his conference? And Pat never approached the combine results of Bucannon...
As for Dix & Pryor - fair point... so look at their junior seasons. Did Dix & Pryor put up the numbers that Bucannon did when he was a junior? I quickly checked Dix and I'm pretty sure wasn't even close!
 

kerouac9

Klowned by Keim
Joined
Feb 14, 2003
Posts
38,612
Reaction score
30,324
Location
Gilbert, AZ
Did Tillman lead his conference? And Pat never approached the combine results of Bucannon...
As for Dix & Pryor - fair point... so look at their junior seasons. Did Dix & Pryor put up the numbers that Bucannon did when he was a junior? I quickly checked Dix and I'm pretty sure wasn't even close!

I'm pretty sure that neither Pryor nor Dix had dumpster fires of defenses playing in front of them. When you're a safety, you have a lot fewer opportunities to make plays if you have guys at cornerback and linebacker who are capable of doing anything.

I'm fine with the pick, and Bucannon plays a different position than Pryor or Dix, so I don't really care. But saying that he was the top-rated player at his position is a nonsense argument. We could still have the top-rated pure guard, or the top-rated punter, or whatever. Doesn't make the pick a great value. I think that everyone here would have taken the second-highest rated OLB over Bucannon.
 

82CardsGrad

7 x 70
Joined
Dec 31, 2004
Posts
36,255
Reaction score
8,274
Location
Scottsdale
I'm pretty sure that neither Pryor nor Dix had dumpster fires of defenses playing in front of them. When you're a safety, you have a lot fewer opportunities to make plays if you have guys at cornerback and linebacker who are capable of doing anything.

Couldn't you argue that if he had more talent/more playmakers around him, his numbers would be less?
The fact that he was able to put up these numbers with virtually no assistance from others is to me, all the more impressive...
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,277
Reaction score
26,907
Location
Orlando, FL
Jean-Baptiste is not on my desired list. He's built like a safety, but he plays too soft. He'd work in some systems, but I don't think he's a fit for the Cards.
 

gimpy

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Aug 23, 2009
Posts
3,398
Reaction score
3,038
Location
Flagstaff, Az
I don't think it matters to SK that much, who the highest rated players are, unless they are his highest rated players. I have to assume that we had the players rated? And that would be why the Cards took him.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 

Forum statistics

Threads
556,061
Posts
5,431,319
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top