The Latest on Rosen

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,407
Reaction score
27,234
Location
Orlando, FL
I’m hearing the Giants prefer Rosen over Haskins in terms of talent. If that’s true it comes down to cost. With Rosen they’d lose a year of control but save some back on salary. They know Haskins won’t last until 17 even if they settled for him. I believe they would offer the 17th pick straight up for Rosen if the Cards are patient. However, I still don't like taking Murray.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,478
Reaction score
40,103
Location
Las Vegas
Even the latest on Risen turned into Murray at the end :)

Thanks for all your posts Harry
 

NYCARDS

Registered
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
956
Reaction score
248
Location
Gone
Murray reminds me too much of RG3. I understand that the game has changed and these Wilson type qbs may be what teams look for but I will take an immobile Tom Brady type over Murray. And Rosen is much more mobile than TB
 

overseascardfan

ASFN Addict
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Posts
8,807
Reaction score
2,096
Location
Phoenix
I’m hearing the Giants prefer Rosen over Haskins in terms of talent. If that’s true it comes down to cost. With Rosen they’d lose a year of control but save some back on salary. They know Haskins won’t last until 17 even if they settled for him. I believe they would offer the 17th pick straight up for Rosen if the Cards are patient. However, I still don't like taking Murray.
Wouldn’t it blow everyone’s mind if they traded down from #1 to take Haskins instead of Murray and then trade Rosen for #17?
 

DRM08

Veteran
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Posts
319
Reaction score
326
Location
West Texas
Murray reminds me too much of RG3. I understand that the game has changed and these Wilson type qbs may be what teams look for but I will take an immobile Tom Brady type over Murray. And Rosen is much more mobile than TB

That's not a fair comparison. Granted, I strongly doubt Murray will have a career anywhere close to Brady. But you are comparing them with full hindsight of Brady's career after 18+ seasons. Clearly a bunch of people didn't think Brady would amount to much or he would not have been a 6th round draft pick.

I can point to a boatload of immobile mega busts in the history of the league who were drafted much, much higher than Tom Brady. Same goes for the RG3 type of mobile QB busts you might point to in comparison with Murray. Nobody knows what Kyler (or Rosen) will be at this point. Only time will tell on both of them.
 

Shane

Comin for you!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
69,478
Reaction score
40,103
Location
Las Vegas
Murray reminds me too much of RG3. I understand that the game has changed and these Wilson type qbs may be what teams look for but I will take an immobile Tom Brady type over Murray. And Rosen is much more mobile than TB

But has the game really “changed”

The look of what we see winning SBs consistently suggests the game hasent changed I’d argue.
 

TheCardFan

Things have changed.
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
12,337
Reaction score
15,579
Location
Charlotte
I’m hearing the Giants prefer Rosen over Haskins in terms of talent. If that’s true it comes down to cost. With Rosen they’d lose a year of control but save some back on salary. They know Haskins won’t last until 17 even if they settled for him. I believe they would offer the 17th pick straight up for Rosen if the Cards are patient. However, I still don't like taking Murray.

To be fair, I think SissyboyFloyd called this first on the board. I believe it was before the OBJ trade and he was saying #6 overall.
 
OP
OP
Harry

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
12,407
Reaction score
27,234
Location
Orlando, FL
To be fair, I think SissyboyFloyd called this first on the board. I believe it was before the OBJ trade and he was saying #6 overall.
Sorry if I missed it. My source is quite good.
 

BW52

Registered
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
5,043
Reaction score
1,904
Location
crestwood,Ky
I’m hearing the Giants prefer Rosen over Haskins in terms of talent. If that’s true it comes down to cost. With Rosen they’d lose a year of control but save some back on salary. They know Haskins won’t last until 17 even if they settled for him. I believe they would offer the 17th pick straight up for Rosen if the Cards are patient. However, I still don't like taking Murray.

If the Cards do trade Rosen for the 17th pick and draft Murray (insanity...oh the horror.....) that means Cards end up with a very risky rookie QB and miss out on one of the possible top defensive draft picks in the draft.Questionable thinking IMHO.
What happens if Murray isn`t ready to start and has to be 2nd QB for weeks...…..Hundley is not a QB that seems like anything more than solid backup/spot starter.Might be okay for a couple of weeks .
 

az jam

ASFN Icon
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Posts
13,006
Reaction score
5,266
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Thanks Harry, things sure are getting interesting. Cards could get a good player at #17 also at #33.
 

juza76

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Posts
13,809
Reaction score
9,631
Location
milan-italy
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
yes he deserve a better stage considering the stellar plays he displayed last season

but he is the same guys telling 9 mistakes were made not selecting me

work hard, showed it on sunday, then u can talk
 

GuernseyCard

ASFN Icon
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Posts
10,123
Reaction score
5,681
Location
London UK
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
yes he deserve a better stage considering the stellar plays he displayed last season

but he is the same guys telling 9 mistakes were made not selecting me

work hard, showed it on sunday, then u can talk

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,169
Reaction score
21,492
Location
South Bay
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
yes he deserve a better stage considering the stellar plays he displayed last season

but he is the same guys telling 9 mistakes were made not selecting me

work hard, showed it on sunday, then u can talk

Not sure what’s worse: the take, or that people actually buy it?
 

Goldfield

Formally known as BEERZ
Joined
Sep 13, 2002
Posts
10,508
Reaction score
2,344
Location
ASFN
If the Cards do trade Rosen for the 17th pick and draft Murray (insanity...oh the horror.....) that means Cards end up with a very risky rookie QB and miss out on one of the possible top defensive draft picks in the draft.Questionable thinking IMHO.
What happens if Murray isn`t ready to start and has to be 2nd QB for weeks...…..Hundley is not a QB that seems like anything more than solid backup/spot starter.Might be okay for a couple of weeks .
If they take Murray #1 he will start ready or not.
 

AZCB34

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Posts
14,871
Reaction score
7,119
Location
Mesa, AZ
But has the game really “changed”

The look of what we see winning SBs consistently suggests the game hasent changed I’d argue.

I think it is fair to say the game is changing but hasn't fully changed yet. Murray represents what the game is moving towards while Rosen represents where the game had been.

I am not saying draft Murray simply what I believe is happening with the NFL game. As long as it isn't Bosa.

Edit to add: Hiring of KK speaks to where the league is going
 

DutchmanAZ

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 22, 2003
Posts
1,846
Reaction score
478
Location
AZ
It’s always been a copy car league. Whether we draft this kid or not, the offense will change. Will it work? Guess that’s why I’ll watch))
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
64,192
Reaction score
59,238
Location
SoCal
If the Cards do trade Rosen for the 17th pick and draft Murray (insanity...oh the horror.....) that means Cards end up with a very risky rookie QB and miss out on one of the possible top defensive draft picks in the draft.Questionable thinking IMHO.
What happens if Murray isn`t ready to start and has to be 2nd QB for weeks...…..Hundley is not a QB that seems like anything more than solid backup/spot starter.Might be okay for a couple of weeks .
All true. I guess the same can be said if Rosen (who I like) doesn’t show any growth from last year - that would really put him in the same class as Murray and then still stuck with Hundley, right?
 

Arz101

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Posts
4,906
Reaction score
5,600
Go find a running QB in Mike Leach and KK's Air Raid system, then we can talk why Rosen is not a fit. Calling Rosen not a fit at this time is proposterous

Sent from my PH-1 using Tapatalk
 

NYCARDS

Registered
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
956
Reaction score
248
Location
Gone
That's not a fair comparison. Granted, I strongly doubt Murray will have a career anywhere close to Brady. But you are comparing them with full hindsight of Brady's career after 18+ seasons. Clearly a bunch of people didn't think Brady would amount to much or he would not have been a 6th round draft pick.

I can point to a boatload of immobile mega busts in the history of the league who were drafted much, much higher than Tom Brady. Same goes for the RG3 type of mobile QB busts you might point to in comparison with Murray. Nobody knows what Kyler (or Rosen) will be at this point. Only time will tell on both of them.

That’s fair but the “boatload” you can point too would not have the meaningfulness as a comparison. I use RG3 as a comparison of his being fragile and most of those mobile quarterbacks don’t have the staying power of say a Tom Brady. Sure there are plenty of pocket passers who never amounted to anything but preference would be to have that more prototypical QB. As you said, right now it’s all speculation. Hopefully in hindsight we made the right decision.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Calling Rosen not a fit at this time is proposterous

Sent from my PH-1 using Tapatalk
And saying he is a fit at this time is proposterous as well imo.

All I know is that Rosen has never produced (college/NFL) even remotely close to any of those top tier QBs in the Air Raid offense...never!

No, I haven’t soured on Rosen but I do feel Murray could maximize K2’s offense more than Rosen. My opinion
 
Last edited:

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Maybe we should’ve lured Lincoln Riley away from OU with the Brink$ truck then taken Murray, since he’s a proven winner & K2 hasn’t been. :lol:

Hmmmm
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
13,338
Reaction score
8,414
Location
Mesa, AZ
If the Cards do trade Rosen for the 17th pick and draft Murray (insanity...oh the horror.....) that means Cards end up with a very risky rookie QB and miss out on one of the possible top defensive draft picks in the draft.Questionable thinking IMHO.
What happens if Murray isn`t ready to start and has to be 2nd QB for weeks...…..Hundley is not a QB that seems like anything more than solid backup/spot starter.Might be okay for a couple of weeks .
It is what it is man.. gotta trust the process. That's whether they draft Murray or keep Rosen. It's just means they think more highly of one more than the other to run the offense. Just gotta go with it and trust the gut of the head coach and the front office for what they think is best..whether it turns out positive or not. Jmo.
 

dscher

ASFN Icon
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Posts
13,338
Reaction score
8,414
Location
Mesa, AZ
Not sure what’s worse: the take, or that people actually buy it?
You don't think players can think this way?! Not saying this is true or not... It's just that it doesn't mean it's not true. Imo
 
Top