The NBA is broken.

[AzStevenCal]

Ben Simmons

Jason Kidd. And that was before the NBA went 3 point crazy. It used to drive me nuts to watch him get to the rim and kick it out (and not always to the 3 point line either).

 

[Dback Jon]

Right, especially since there's no way that can be a percentage play. I've seen players pass up uncontested dunks in order to pass to a teammate behind the arc.

100% chance of 2 points vs 35% chance of 3.

Unless you are down 3 with 10 seconds, never a reason to.

 

[JCSunsfan]

This is the only thread I have read in a month. I agree. I am not interested in the NBA much anymore. If the Suns do well, I will watch because the Suns are just in my blood. But now I only really watch if they are playing well. That's why I haven't posted here in so long.

 

[Hoop Head]

This is the only thread I have read in a month. I agree. I am not interested in the NBA much anymore. If the Suns do well, I will watch because the Suns are just in my blood. But now I only really watch if they are playing well. That's why I haven't posted here in so long.

Your posts are missed. Always appreciated reading your takes. Can't force investment so I get it. Just thought I'd give you some credit and also say I hope you're doing well outside of sports fandom.

 

[Mainstreet]

This is the only thread I have read in a month. I agree. I am not interested in the NBA much anymore. If the Suns do well, I will watch because the Suns are just in my blood. But now I only really watch if they are playing well. That's why I haven't posted here in so long.

It's a long shot, but maybe the Suns catch a wave and ride it home to a championship.

 

[capologist]

I agree wholeheartedly that the game is bastardize now and hardly watchable.

But from an analytics standpoint, the 3 point attempts per game are 39.7. If you multiply that by the successful shooting percentage (38.3%) then by the points made per successful basket (3 points), you get 45.6153 points for those 39.7 attempts.

Now if you take those same 39.7 attempts and use the two point successful shooting percentage (54.6%) then by the points made per successful basket (2 points), you get 43.3524 points for those attempts.

So you get roughly 2.26 more points for those attempts by shooting threes instead of two point shots. Which is unfortunate.

You need to account for the fact that the guys shooting .546 from two are probably getting to the line more than the guys shooting .383 from three.

 

[Mainstreet]

You need to account for the fact that the guys shooting .546 from two are probably getting to the line more than the guys shooting .383 from three.

I don't have the stats, but not as much as you would think. More contact is allowed inside and the referees protect the three point shooters more, especially how they land.

 

[AzStevenCal]

I don't have the stats, but not as much as you would think. More contact is allowed inside and the referees protect the three point shooters more, especially how they land.

Probably accurate but I don't think anyone factors in the extra turnover risks of that corner 3. So often they step out of bounds or they travel trying to evade the closeout.

 

[Mainstreet]

Probably accurate but I don't think anyone factors in the extra turnover risks of that corner 3. So often they step out of bounds or they travel trying to evade the closeout.

Stepping out of bounds is a big one. I hadn't factored that into the equation.

However, so-called experts push the philosophy of taking more 3-point shots, so the math must favor it.

 

[AzStevenCal]

Stepping out of bounds is a big one. I hadn't factored that into the equation.

However, so-called experts push the philosophy of taking more 3-point shots, so the math must favor it.

Sure but do they factor in the extra turnovers? I don't know, maybe I focus too much on that and fail to recognize that turnovers might occur at a similar rate even when the corner 3 isn't involved but it doesn't seem that way.

 

[Mainstreet]

Sure but do they factor in the extra turnovers? I don't know, maybe I focus too much on that and fail to recognize that turnovers might occur at a similar rate even when the corner 3 isn't involved.

I would think so. These analytic guys are pretty thorough, but I'm not one of them.

It's hard enough for me to learn all the nuances of the new CBA.

 

[AzStevenCal]

I would think so. These analytic guys are pretty thorough, but I'm not one of them.

It's hard enough for me to learn all the nuances of the new CBA.

I can spell CBA, haven't gone much further than that though.

 

[Mainstreet]

I can spell CBA, haven't gone much further than that though.

Then you are a lot smarter than me.

NBA teams pay front office people lots of money to understand this stuff. I know just enough to be dangerous.

 

[Proximo]

100% chance of 2 points vs 35% chance of 3.

Unless you are down 3 with 10 seconds, never a reason to.

For an unguarded corner 3 it is much closer to 50%, and it's even better than that if you have numbers and a good chance at being able to get the offensive long rebound.

That said, the dunk is usually the better idea, unless you are behind double digits.

 

[Covert Rain]

The other factor is one and done. One and dones are more prevalent shooting 3 pointers than they are 2 pointers.

 

[Cheesebeef]

Jason Kidd. And that was before the NBA went 3 point crazy. It used to drive me nuts to watch him get to the rim and kick it out (and not always to the 3 point line either).

Yup. Same here.

 

[Suns_fan69]

Boris Diaw low-key held that mantle for a while too.