K9, you didn't really support anything different than what I said. Tilt at windmills all you like, but the final 53 and the actual 46 that dress aren't that different. There are definitely a lot of cap games and depth wiggle that lives in the "naked 7" that don't dress, but you have given absolutely no basis that SK forced BA to keep RW in that group, other than conjecture.
Tell me who was leaking the "ryan williams trade bait" articles then if it wasn't Keim? And BA has talked up Stephan Taylor a bunch two and he's had what, 4 touches this year?
MAYBE Keim forced BA to keep RW. But there's absolutely no proof of that. What we have proof of is that BA has not spoken well of RW's desire to be on the field but has spoken well of his talent, Keim has spoken well of him but there were several reports of him being on the trade block, and now he doesn't dress but made the team. You can look at that all kinds of ways, but the bottom line is we have no idea what is really going on with that situation.
In the Scho situation, that has no Keim on it at all. Mid-preseason cuts are 100 percent the coach's call, and the only way the GM is going to override it is if its going to cause a massive cap issue.
Tell me who was leaking the "ryan williams trade bait" articles then if it wasn't Keim? And BA has talked up Stephan Taylor a bunch two and he's had what, 4 touches this year?
MAYBE Keim forced BA to keep RW. But there's absolutely no proof of that. What we have proof of is that BA has not spoken well of RW's desire to be on the field but has spoken well of his talent, Keim has spoken well of him but there were several reports of him being on the trade block, and now he doesn't dress but made the team. You can look at that all kinds of ways, but the bottom line is we have no idea what is really going on with that situation.
In the Scho situation, that has no Keim on it at all. Mid-preseason cuts are 100 percent the coach's call, and the only way the GM is going to override it is if its going to cause a massive cap issue.