The Territorial Cup--ASU @ UofA

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,012
Reaction score
21,147
Location
South Bay
It doesn't matter. How many years did U of A suck but beat ASU and called the season a success?

Neither does the past. You wont find a single sane UofA fan who would define the Mackovic years as a "success," regardless of whether or not we beat ASU. But while we're talking about the past, UofA still has a 9 game edge in the head-to-head record in the TC. ;)

What matters more is that UofA is getting much more national notoriety than ASU. Despite having the same record, UofA is getting ranking votes and is probably going to get a sexier bowl than ASU (new rumors out today that Vegas Bowl is strongly considering choosing UofA).

The rivalry game will always be a crap shoot; regardless of record. One team could be 11-1 and the other could be 1-11.

However, IMO, UofA football will begin distancing itself from ASU within two years.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Not sure what you're talking about TJ, I'm pretty sure we're headed to New Mexico. Either way it was a successful first season all things considered. Did you see our depth chart on defense going into the season? We started three walk-ons and our pass rush specialist was a running back up until September.

And neither program is going to start distancing itself from anything. Neither program is recruiting particularly well, neither program did anything noteworthy this year, both programs lose key players from this year's mediocre teams, both coaches have marginal resumes over the last several years causing limited clout in living rooms and HS practice fields, and Arizona still hasn't become a hotbed for recruiting and the few local kids will continue looking elsewhere. Meanwhile UCLA is freaking loaded and young and USC will always have a talent advantage over both schools. I don't even have to go into the North and what Oregon and Stanford have going on in this era. After this long a program is what it is no matter how much hot air and kool-aid fueled delusions Graham and Rodriguez want to blow up our butts.
 
Last edited:

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,012
Reaction score
21,147
Location
South Bay
Not sure what you're talking about TJ, I'm pretty sure we're headed to New Mexico. Either way it was a successful first season all things considered. Did you see our depth chart on defense going into the season? We started three walk-ons and our pass rush specialist was a running back up until September.

And neither program is going to start distancing itself from anything. Neither program is recruiting particularly well, neither program did anything noteworthy this year, both programs lose key players from this year's mediocre teams, both coaches have marginal resumes over the last several years causing limited clout in living rooms and HS practice fields, and Arizona still hasn't become a hotbed for recruiting and the few local kids will continue looking elsewhere. Meanwhile UCLA is freaking loaded and young and USC will always have a talent advantage over both schools. I don't even have to go into the North and what Oregon and Stanford have going on in this era. After this long a program is what it is no matter how much hot air and kool-aid fueled delusions Graham and Rodriguez want to blow up our butts.

Do you read Ryan Finley? He indicated today that the director of the Kraft FHB has heard rumblings that the Vegas Bowl is strongly considering UA. This was mentioned last Sunday as well. The logic is that UW opens against BSU next season in their new stadium (provided BSU is the MWC choice) and ASU had such a poor performance last season that they don't want them back.

In addition, I'm convinced RichRod will be more successful in two years largely because of what you said - we started 3 walk ons on defense in a new 3-3-5 scheme. When he and Casteel get their men, we won't be getting trounced on the ground.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
In addition, I'm convinced RichRod will be more successful in two years largely because of what you said - we started 3 walk ons on defense in a new 3-3-5 scheme. When he and Casteel get their men, we won't be getting trounced on the ground.
I agree but like ASU we'll still have our recruiting and game management issues that will prevent us from creating this distance that you mention.
 

Brian in Mesa

Advocatus Diaboli
Super Moderator
Moderator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
72,809
Reaction score
24,453
Location
Killjoy Central
You wont find a single sane UofA fan who would define the Mackovic years as a "success," regardless of whether or not we beat ASU.

For the record - you did not beat ASU while Mackovic was coach. Just saying. :D

:sparky:
 

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,012
Reaction score
21,147
Location
South Bay
For the record - you did not beat ASU while Mackovic was coach. Just saying. :D

:sparky:

Seeing as I attended UofA during the Mackovic years, I conveniently repressed those not so fond memories and myopically focused on hoops. People think the cupboards were bear when RichRod took over. There was literally nothing left when Stoops took over for Mackovic.

As Mao indicated, we did beat ASU in his first season. :BIM:
 
Last edited:

TJ

Frank Kaminsky is my Hero.
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Posts
35,012
Reaction score
21,147
Location
South Bay
I agree but like ASU we'll still have our recruiting and game management issues that will prevent us from creating this distance that you mention.

If history is the ultimate predictor of the future, Todd Graham will have found his next "Dream Job" within the next couple of months. ;)

As for recruiting, we were Top 25 in the nation according to Rivals last season with a brand new head coach at the helm. RichRod can recruit. That was never an issue with him at WVU or UM. In addition, I don't see Graham as a better recruiter for talent than RichRod mainly due to track record and personality. Yes, RichRod has his warts, but a kid cannot be confident that he will get recruited by ASU and not receive a "Sayonara" text from Graham within a few months. In addition to which, RichRod has a big chip on his shoulders. He hates Graham, and the feeling is mutual. He has been vocal about the fact that Graham has a larger salary (due to ASU's desperation for a coach). Also, RichRod wants to prove nationally that the Michigan fiasco was a fluke and nothing more than a bad fit (the book "Three and Out" does an excellent job explaining what actually happened during his Michigan tenure). RichRod has every reason you can think of to be successful at Arizona.

Moreover, Greg Byrne understands the importance of having a competent football team at any university. He will hold the entire coaching staff to a very high standard now that we were blessed with the stadium expansion.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
If history is the ultimate predictor of the future, Todd Graham will have found his next "Dream Job" within the next couple of months. ;)

As for recruiting, we were Top 25 in the nation according to Rivals last season with a brand new head coach at the helm. RichRod can recruit. That was never an issue with him at WVU or UM. In addition, I don't see Graham as a better recruiter for talent than RichRod mainly due to track record and personality. Yes, RichRod has his warts, but a kid cannot be confident that he will get recruited by ASU and not receive a "Sayonara" text from Graham within a few months. In addition to which, RichRod has a big chip on his shoulders. He hates Graham, and the feeling is mutual. He has been vocal about the fact that Graham has a larger salary (due to ASU's desperation for a coach). Also, RichRod wants to prove nationally that the Michigan fiasco was a fluke and nothing more than a bad fit (the book "Three and Out" does an excellent job explaining what actually happened during his Michigan tenure). RichRod has every reason you can think of to be successful at Arizona.

Moreover, Greg Byrne understands the importance of having a competent football team at any university. He will hold the entire coaching staff to a very high standard now that we were blessed with the stadium expansion.

So, to sum TJ's analysis: "RichRod is desperate and bitter, thus, he will be more successful at UA."

Just my observation, but desperation and bitterness don't play well for the in-home recruiting visit. Car salesman still > than psycho head coach in that regard.
 
OP
OP
Z

Zobaczcie suki

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
17,440
Reaction score
8,667
So, to sum TJ's analysis: "RichRod is desperate and bitter, thus, he will be more successful at UA."

Just my observation, but desperation and bitterness don't play well for the in-home recruiting visit. Car salesman still > than psycho head coach in that regard.


:thumbup:

Graham is a much better salesman, and the product he is selling is superior. Sorry Wildcats.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
As for recruiting, we were Top 25 in the nation according to Rivals last season with a brand new head coach at the helm. RichRod can recruit.
Actually #46 in 2012 rankings per Rivals. #28 right now for 2013 but a lot of other schools have room while we are mostly full. ASU was #38 in 2012 and will probably stay there in the 30's while we move back to somewhere around their level.

Which brings me back to my point: Neither of these programs is going to create this separation that you're talking about. Programs are who they are and neither is good or bad enough to leave the other one in the dust short of a Lute Olson type hiring. And hate to break it to you but Rich Rod and Graham ain't Lute Olson. They're maybe Bill Frieder.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
:thumbup:

Graham is a much better salesman, and the product he is selling is superior. Sorry Wildcats.
Five winning seasons in the last 15 years is a good product? Around .500 football against D1 teams over the last thirty is something to recruit with?

Sorry Devils, just like UofA your program as a whole isn't good enough to overcome it's systemic flaws even if Graham was the best salesman in the world (which he isn't, see your recruiting classes).
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Z

Zobaczcie suki

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
17,440
Reaction score
8,667
Five winning seasons in the last 15 years is a good product? Around .500 football against D1 teams over the last thirty is something to recruit with?

Sorry Devils, just like UofA your program as a whole isn't good enough to overcome it's systemic flaws even if Graham was the best salesman in the world (which he isn't, see your recruiting classes).

Ya, no I wasn't talking about the old product, I am talking about the new one with a +1 record over U of A in the Graham v. Rodriguez era. See the scoreboard. Of course, we still have a better location, better school, better campus, and all of that too of course.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
Ya, no I wasn't talking about the old product, I am talking about the new one with a +1 record over U of A in the Graham v. Rodriguez era. See the scoreboard. Of course, we still have a better location, better school, better campus, and all of that too of course.
Um...you went 7-5, beat no ranked teams, beat a mediocre UA team on the road, and have a recruiting class ranked in the middle of the conference. How is that different than what Erickson and Koetter were doing?

Like I'd say to TJ, do something of significance as a program this century before crowing.
 
OP
OP
Z

Zobaczcie suki

ASFN Icon
Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Posts
17,440
Reaction score
8,667
Um...you went 7-5, beat no ranked teams, beat a mediocre UA team on the road, and have a recruiting class ranked in the middle of the conference. How is that different than what Erickson and Koetter were doing?

Like I'd say to TJ, do something of significance as a program this century before crowing.


At least we beat some Wildcat ass!

:rockon:

:sparky:
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
Your observation should be that neither is working all that well.

And it won't, until Arizona starts producing talent to field at least one team. And they stay home. Unlike basketball, football recruits are less likely to travel more than a day's drive to school.
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
And it won't, until Arizona starts producing talent to field at least one team. And they stay home. Unlike basketball, football recruits are less likely to travel more than a day's drive to school.

I agree, my guess is you put Todd Graham at UT he'll brings in top 10 classes. Just like RR did at Michigan. Programs are what they are, it takes a decades of systemic evolution or a transformative figure to change that. Both our schools might (hopefully) be somewhere in the middle of the former due to Arizona's population explosion but I highly doubt RR or Graham is the latter. Phil Knight is a great example of the latter.
 

Gaddabout

Plucky Comic Relief
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2004
Posts
16,043
Reaction score
11
Location
Gilbert
I agree, my guess is you put Todd Graham at UT he'll brings in top 10 classes. Just like RR did at Michigan. Programs are what they are, it takes a decades of systemic evolution or a transformative figure to change that. Both our schools might (hopefully) be somewhere in the middle of the former due to Arizona's population explosion but I highly doubt RR or Graham is the latter. Phil Knight is a great example of the latter.

I would add Arizona's suburban wasteland culture encourages a lot of kids to go elsewhere. Especially the ones that are second-gen or less. Like the desert, we make it really hard to lay roots here. I keep hearing people bitch about kids leaving to play at the Cal schools or even eastward. Besides the fact our schools don't win, these kids don't grow up skin in this game.

My contention with my fellow ASU fans is that ASU will be the school it thinks it is when they stop comparing themselves to UA. No offense. I say the same thing about UA fans who are obsessed with ASU.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 

AZ Native

Living is Easy with Eyes Closed
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Posts
15,939
Reaction score
8,306
Location
Cave Creek
ASU wins the Territorial Cup this year and will hold it all year, U of A fans can whine all year! Love it!
 

MaoTosiFanClub

The problem
Joined
Oct 7, 2003
Posts
12,737
Reaction score
6,623
Location
Scottsdale, AZ
I would add Arizona's suburban wasteland culture encourages a lot of kids to go elsewhere. Especially the ones that are second-gen or less. Like the desert, we make it really hard to lay roots here. I keep hearing people bitch about kids leaving to play at the Cal schools or even eastward. Besides the fact our schools don't win, these kids don't grow up skin in this game.

My contention with my fellow ASU fans is that ASU will be the school it thinks it is when they stop comparing themselves to UA. No offense. I say the same thing about UA fans who are obsessed with ASU.
You're right because neither program ain't nothing to write home about.

And yes, I love UofA and Arizona as a whole. But if my kid gets a free ride to Cal, Stanford, UCLA, or USC he or she is going there. That's just common sense. It has nothing to do with suburban wasteland, more with post-graduate success and future connections.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
553,842
Posts
5,411,742
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top