Stout said:
Yeah, Pariah, my bad. I skimmed the article, didn't catch the person's name before it, and saw Green right after it. Well, thank God I was wrong...if that was Denny, we would've been screwed! Whew!
Crazy, you can kiss off. Smiley or no, there's no need to pile on. Point was made, and there was no need to repeat the quote. Sorry PARIAH.
Stout, im in the minority here but i completly agree with you and heres why:
-Denny made the quote about how the offense will take time to round into shape (so far hes right)he didnt expect much at all at least at the beginning
-Denny and Graves have both already said (and i cant believe this quote does not get brought up more) that the 2006 QB is not currently on this roster
-Starting Brown, Rolle, and Arrington are moves you dont make if you consider yourself a contender. Do you see Philly, NE, or even Cinncy starting as many rookie as we do. Patterson, Mankins, and Thuman aside, thats just to many green players at important positions for a team trying to win it all. So why do this. To give them playing time and have them be battle tested when we are ready to go. I think Denny said Brown was not ready about week before making him starter. What happened in that week? Well Denny wanted the talented player thrown in the fire and he will be better for it next year. Its the same logic starting Step last year. Does anyone really think that Step outplayed Kendall last year before he was cut. Denny knew Kendall was not in the long term plan so he cut him and got Step time, knowing it would pay off later.
-Everyone in the front office has been pointing to next year to be real contenders. This year was supposed to be 8-8, 9-7 and maybe getting some playoff experience but i think the entire front office knows this team is just too young to compete for it all this year.
Now i dont think that Denny thought it was going to happen like this. Judging from his quotes i think he thought the defense would be able to pull more than their weight the first half and hopefully all the inexperience would start to payoff in good results later with the O. I also think he overestimated how good Ross, Davis and Wells were in thinking they would be able cover for youngins like Brown and Step. So while the national expectations were based on our talent (which as i have said before is the highest its ever been), i think the people in charge knew better (notice no 10-6 predictions this year) and thought we would be a decent to good team, with a chance to win a sorry division.
Everyone points to teams in the NFL rising out of no where and becoming good teams and the Cards were the chic pick to do just that. But if you look back at the history, those teams didn't take off because of splashy FA additions or rookies exclusivly (although the right piece sometimes brought it all together). They did because players who had played at a lower level previously became better with experience.
Carolina (peppers, jenkins, morgan)
Chicago (Urlacher, Robinson, Mike Brown)
Pats (Bruschi, Seymour)
Bengals 05 (Palmer, TJ housh,)
Rams (Fletcher, Bly, and even Bruce, although Kurt, Torry, and Marshall helped just a tad
...maybe this is the one exception)
I could list more but im outta time. You all have been great.....happy hour between 6-9 during the week.......