gimpy
ASFN Lifer
When have we really had a second round pick, or even a first round pick (minus KM) come in and start game one and play the majority of the season? Defense or offense?
Is your profile name for real? LolHe is not good and doesnt have potential. Doesn't get open and doesn't break tackles.
Prob would have gone undrafted
Kirk maybe? Murphy started in his rookie season but he wasn't very good.When have we really had a second round pick, or even a first round pick (minus KM) come in and start game one and play the majority of the season? Defense or offense?
If he does, I don't think anyone will be upset to be proven wrong. At this point, he'd have to do a lot, starting immediately, to justify his draft status. In the modern NFL, 2nd round picks have to contribute immediately. He's contributing, but it's negatively.
Kirk maybe? Murphy started in his rookie season but he wasn't very good.
When have we really had a second round pick, or even a first round pick (minus KM) come in and start game one and play the majority of the season? Defense or offense?
Yeah, your attack crumbles right there, @BritCard. The context is he has done nothing as a 2nd round pick. His contributions are almost a total net negative at this point. But, yeah, I should be happy with the kid and think everything's peaches and cream lolThe war cry of the perennial moaner.
"I'm going to whinge and moan and rag on this kid without context because it costs me nothing and if he turns out good I'll just say "Well he sucked THEN" but I'm glad he's good now"
He's not contributing because he isn't being given a chance to. I showed in the Seahawks game how Kyler missed a pass to him for a huge gain and possible TD. I'm guessing people would feel different had our $250m quarterback could look to his right.
With what we've seen from the Cardinals during the Kingsbury era, who would you blame? Kingsbury? McBride?If he does, I don't think anyone will be upset to be proven wrong. At this point, he'd have to do a lot, starting immediately, to justify his draft status. In the modern NFL, 2nd round picks have to contribute immediately. He's contributing, but it's negatively.
Yeah, your attack crumbles right there, @BritCard. The context is he has done nothing as a 2nd round pick. His contributions are almost a total net negative at this point. But, yeah, I should be happy with the kid and think everything's peaches and cream lol
Every time he gets a chance, he's seemingly committing penalties. But that earns him...more chances?
He is what he is right now: An overdrafted rookie who was injured in preseason, never got up to speed, and isn't ready.
Isaiah Likely is is similar scenario in BAL with Andrews as primary TE but he is looking like a 4th round steal for BAL who always seems to do no wrong in player acquisition.
Right now likely is clearly the better player.Is Likely better than McBride? Or is McBride just on a team with a quarterback and system that lets him showcase what he can do?
The war cry of the perennial moaner.
"I'm going to whinge and moan and rag on this kid without context because it costs me nothing and if he turns out good I'll just say "Well he sucked THEN" but I'm glad he's good now"
He's not contributing because he isn't being given a chance to. I showed in the Seahawks game how Kyler missed a pass to him for a huge gain and possible TD. I'm guessing people would feel different had our $250m quarterback could look to his right.
Right now likely is clearly the better player.
The cognitive dissonance is strong here. The only reason McBride isn't doing as well as Likely is usage. No other reason?He's producing more. That's not the same as better. Likely is just being used well where McBride is not on a team that always heavily features TE's vs a team that does not.
The cognitive dissonance is strong here. The only reason McBride isn't doing as well as Likely is usage. No other reason?
For me, if I have a young, inexperienced, and not ready for prime time player that keeps crapping the bed when given a chance, I'm not giving him more responsibility.
Likley also passes the eye test…McBride does not. Likely looked special in preseason.He's producing more. That's not the same as better. Likely is just being used well where McBride is not on a team that always heavily features TE's vs a team that does not.
No, you're using phrases like "untargeted 40-yard gain" as if that means anything whatsoever. You literally just cited this and how he's gone untargeted as reasons we should think he's doing well. Talk about "feels."How would you know?
I mean, to support my argument I've shown him ripping off an untargeted 40 yard gain where he was wide open and stats show 4 or 5 games he's played significant snaps he's gone untargeted.
You have "feels".
He's getting targets. You can't really attack a receiver if they aren't getting targets, especially really early in their career.The cognitive dissonance is strong here. The only reason McBride isn't doing as well as Likely is usage. No other reason?
How do you know? It's all conjecture at this point. What I see is a team that is consistently failing to use all of their weapons. Even with DHop out, the Cardinals had more good to decent receivers than an average team. There is a disconnect between GM and coach that has been present from the very first year they were together. And then their is a disconnect between coach and QB. This isn't exactly a high functioning organization at the moment.For me, if I have a young, inexperienced, and not ready for prime time player that keeps crapping the bed when given a chance, I'm not giving him more responsibility.