Folster
ASFN Icon
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Posts
- 16,820
- Reaction score
- 7,314
the logical explanation is that the Suns had
a) no intention of stretching or waiving Anderson
This seems likely since re-signing Oubre takes them out of the FA market anyway even if they did stretch Anderson.
So if you do not stretch Anderson then Tyler Johnson actually does give you 2M$ more room while being a more servicable player.
If you think about it like that, buying out Anderson would only have gained the Suns 4M$ caproom while not having the player. Is Tyler Johnson worth a 4M$ contract? Probably yes.
I think you may be onto something. The Suns knowing they would not be players in free agency decided they wanted a large expiring contract for next year. They had one with Anderson, but by keeping him they would have to pay him an extra 6 million vs waiving him.
Johnson give them their large expiring and also saves them a couple million.