Under the radar backs

Cardforlife

Veteran
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Posts
240
Reaction score
0
Location
Oh Canada!
i think that a guy like Blaylock who's smaller could be a Green kind of back for this offense. He is quick, with good hands and carried the mail pretty darn good with Holmes out. I know people say he's a product of a good system. But then you have to say the same of Holmes and johnson who had similar numbers in the same system. And I know there wouldn't be too many people complaining if we had a shot at either of those 2. Also Davenport from Green bay is a more interesting opition for me than Jordan. The only thing is he's more of a brusier. And A combo of Shipp and Blaylock would be more verstile!
 

azdad1978

Championship!!!!
Joined
Dec 8, 2002
Posts
14,982
Reaction score
50
Location
ordinance 2257
Cardforlife said:
i think that a guy like Blaylock who's smaller could be a Green kind of back for this offense. He is quick, with good hands and carried the mail pretty darn good with Holmes out. I know people say he's a product of a good system. But then you have to say the same of Holmes and johnson who had similar numbers in the same system.
Holmes has put up great numbers and is a proven back. Blaylock and Johnson doesn't have the great numbers like Holmes. Plus the fact that Chiefs Oline is one of the biggest and best Oline in the NFL, Blaylock could be a system back. But hey :bhiich:
 
OP
OP
C

Cardforlife

Veteran
Joined
Mar 26, 2003
Posts
240
Reaction score
0
Location
Oh Canada!
Don't get me wrong I'm not putting Holmes and Blaylock in the same class but Blaylock put up some good numbers in games he played
he had 723 yards rushing on 156 carries for an avg. of 4.6/ carry 8 tds and 0 fumbles!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
559,965
Posts
5,468,774
Members
6,338
Latest member
61_Shasta
Top