82CardsGrad
7 x 70
82grad has a strong dislike for Matt and is pissed that he may actually get his chance this year.
Dammit... I'm exposed once again...
82grad has a strong dislike for Matt and is pissed that he may actually get his chance this year.
I think what you meant to say is that Johnson tossed 37 passes within his first 3 seasons.
This thread is a broken record.My point is not that he hasn't been a starter, but that he literally has not tossed single pass in 4 years... Johnson, in his first 3 years in the league as a non-starter, tossed 384 passes... that's 384 more than Charlie...
This thread is a broken record.
To break the cycle of "he hasn't taken practically any snaps" vs. "Wiz knows best". someone please answer the following question:
If not Whitehurst or Anderson, who?
AARP-eligible Charley Batch or Jeff Garcia? Spleen-challenged Chris Simms? Another year of BSP?
Or do we roll the dice on the Cody McCoys of the world?
There don't seem to be many viable options out there.
This thread is a broken record.
To break the cycle of "he hasn't taken practically any snaps" vs. "Wiz knows best". someone please answer the following question:
If not Whitehurst or Anderson, who?
AARP-eligible Charley Batch or Jeff Garcia? Spleen-challenged Chris Simms? Another year of BSP?
Or do we roll the dice on the Cody McCoys of the world?
There don't seem to be many viable options out there.
Well, not sure about Cody McCoy Jeff, but if it's up to me, I'd take a shot at drafting Colt McCoy over giving up a 3rd rounder for Whitehurst... but that's just me...
This thread is a broken record.
To break the cycle of "he hasn't taken practically any snaps" vs. "Wiz knows best". someone please answer the following question:
If not Whitehurst or Anderson, who?
AARP-eligible Charley Batch or Jeff Garcia? Spleen-challenged Chris Simms? Another year of BSP?
Or do we roll the dice on the Cody McCoys of the world?
There don't seem to be many viable options out there.
Well, not sure about Cody McCoy Jeff, but if it's up to me, I'd take a shot at drafting Colt McCoy over giving up a 3rd rounder for Whitehurst... but that's just me...
If it was my decision to make it would be Whitehurst I feel like he is the best option and certainly better than a rookie i dont want a 2nd year guy running the team next year bc we all know the cards arent paying matty next year at what he is due to make. At least Whitehurst has learned from one of the best the last 4 years something you cant say about a rookie.
Your talking about a 1st for McCoy, cause he won't be there 2nd. I'll pass on that.
My point - Whitehurst may not be the perfect answer, but appears to be the best of a mediocre set of options.If it was my decision to make it would be Whitehurst I feel like he is the best option and certainly better than a rookie i dont want a 2nd year guy running the team next year bc we all know the cards arent paying matty next year at what he is due to make. At least Whitehurst has learned from one of the best the last 4 years something you cant say about a rookie.
I'd take Anderson first and this guy 2nd.
We don't know that... I wouldn't spend a 1st on McCoy either... but if he's there for us in the 2nd round, I would definitely jump at that...
Anderson had one of the worst games in NFL history last year and his other games werent far behind, him and bulger are the two guys that would make me throw up if we signed them plus it wont solve our QB problem for next year which should be just as big of a concern
As someone who has been a proponent of Whitehurst coming here I am afraid this is a precursor to his signing Seattles offer sheet.
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/15636/seahawks-roster-shakeup-continues
Likely the 4th rounder is the compensation they have worked out with San Diego?
Thanks for the link. I think you're right and I think Seattle didn't deal for a 4th until they heard that Whitehurst was willing to sign.
Unless it's a money thing (because I get the money thing), I don't understand why Whitehurst would prefer Seattle to Phoenix.
There's a much much better chance he'll be starting in Seattle than here.
Not if they draft Clausen with their #6 pick.
If it was my decision to make it would be Whitehurst I feel like he is the best option and certainly better than a rookie i dont want a 2nd year guy running the team next year bc we all know the cards arent paying matty next year at what he is due to make. At least Whitehurst has learned from one of the best the last 4 years something you cant say about a rookie.
How do we know that? If he plays well this season what he is due next year is less than the price of a franchised QB.
I'm not psychic so I don't pretend to know how he will do, I think/hope he will play well but who knows?
I am not dead set against Whitehurst I just don't think giving up a third round pick for him is the right thing to do. If we can negotiate a conditional pick type of thing for next years draft that would be fine.
Whitehurst didn't have a stellar college career--he had a high completion % but had a propensity for throwing INTs, so far in his preseason snaps he has continued to throw more INTs than TDs, thats worrisome to me because its a continuing trend.
Whitehurst and waiting gamesIf the Cardinals signed Chargers RFA Charlie Whitehurst to an offer sheet, for example, the other quarterback on their radar, Derek Anderson, might sign elsewhere before Arizona even knew if San Diego would match the Whitehurst offer.