Vicious

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Spearing = leading with your head.



Wilson doesnt really lead with his head, he just punishes defenseless receivers.

But he's been called for spearing before when he's led with his shoulder. The "defenseless receiver" rule is one of the worst ever concocted by the NFL. Punishing receivers has long been one of the most effective ways to play pass defense.

It's like the NBA writing a new rule that if a player is fouled in the paint going to the basket he gets 5 to make 4.
 

LVCARDFREAK

In the league 20 years!
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
6,360
Reaction score
1
Location
Vegas
Heard and NFL official on the radio today taling about this hit and he said it was clearly illegal. He said there is a rule in the NFL, which I didnt know about, the states when a defensive player has his head turned upfield and is running along the LOS, an offensive player cannot attack from a position out of his sight line.

He said he didnt even think about 'defensless player' or 'leading with helmet' because it clearly violated tha rule i mentioned above and it was a personal foul...interesting
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
Heard and NFL official on the radio today taling about this hit and he said it was clearly illegal. He said there is a rule in the NFL, which I didnt know about, the states when a defensive player has his head turned upfield and is running along the LOS, an offensive player cannot attack from a position out of his sight line.

He said he didnt even think about 'defensless player' or 'leading with helmet' because it clearly violated tha rule i mentioned above and it was a personal foul...interesting

Isn't that what they call a crack back block?
 

LVCARDFREAK

In the league 20 years!
Joined
Mar 3, 2003
Posts
6,360
Reaction score
1
Location
Vegas
Isn't that what they call a crack back block?

Thats what I was thinking, but he said technically a 'crackback' block was illegal too. The reason they dont call it is usually the defender is parallel to the LOS when the block comes and the offensive player isnt out of his sight line entirely.

He said this infraction is called all the time, but refs call it a 'personal foul' or 'unneccesary roughness' and most fans dopnt know its an actual rule

He said, to be fair, he has to explain it to most coaches after its called as well...

EDIT: He also said no such rule exists for the defense on a fumble recovery or an INT return.
 

Matt L

formerly known as mattyboy
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Posts
4,380
Reaction score
589
Location
Phoenix, Arizona
You must be registered for see images


That is his helmet connecting with the Dallas Linebacker's chin.
 
Last edited:

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,957
Reaction score
13,707
Location
Albq
seems I remember a hit like that to Warner in Saints playoff game
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX

Which is why I find it hard to believe that most are defending it now. There was alot of swearing that day! I guarantee you peeps would be screaming murder if Fitz took a shot like that & missed significant time.
 

ajcardfan

I see you.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
38,921
Reaction score
26,336
He's going to get a big fine for sure. More than that is too much, unless he has past history I don't know about.
 

Duckjake

LEGACY MEMBER
LEGACY MEMBER
Joined
Jun 10, 2002
Posts
32,190
Reaction score
317
Location
Texas
You must be registered for see images


That is his helmet connecting with the Dallas Linebacker's chin.

That Dallas guy must have been really unhappy because he sure has a long face.
 

D-Dogg

A Whole New World
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Posts
44,984
Reaction score
1,060
Location
In The End Zone
Kurt was hit from behind and the side, looking the opposite direction, no chance to see it in periphery.

This cowboy was hit in the chest looking to the sideline, with a chance to see it coming in his periphery.

Big difference, IMO.

 

52brandon

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Oct 30, 2011
Posts
3,407
Reaction score
0
Which is why I find it hard to believe that most are defending it now. There was alot of swearing that day! I guarantee you peeps would be screaming murder if Fitz took a shot like that & missed significant time.
it was a block on a defender there though
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,943
Reaction score
6,874
Location
Goodyear
Guy was covering tate in zone coverage and was behind tate for the play - he released to pursue wilson and got tagged in the chest because he wasn't paying attention - not paying attention doesn't make you defenseless .... being in active pursuit (in the lead position at that to make the play) and getting hit by the same guy you were just defending doesn't make you defenseless ...... it makes you stupid

tates left shoulder makes first contact with the right part of his chest

that still image is after the initial impact and taking from the opposite angle of first contact ... even in that though you see tate has his legs on the ground, is hunched at the impact, has his hands in his abdomen, a shoulder into his chest and his helmet is lower than his shoulders .... not his fault guy went crash test dummy & bobble headed onto him

brutal yes .... but it's a brutal game

next time pay attention to your surroundings and you wont get tagged like that - not every hard hit is a bad hit
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
Guy was covering tate in zone coverage and was behind tate for the play - he released to pursue wilson and got tagged in the chest because he wasn't paying attention - not paying attention doesn't make you defenseless .... being in active pursuit (in the lead position at that to make the play) and getting hit by the same guy you were just defending doesn't make you defenseless ...... it makes you stupid

tates left shoulder makes first contact with the right part of his chest

that still image is after the initial impact and taking from the opposite angle of first contact ... even in that though you see tate has his legs on the ground, is hunched at the impact, has his hands in his abdomen, a shoulder into his chest and his helmet is lower than his shoulders .... not his fault guy went crash test dummy & bobble headed onto him

brutal yes .... but it's a brutal game

next time pay attention to your surroundings and you wont get tagged like that - not every hard hit is a bad hit
You might be right, but something tells me Tate intended to drive his helmet up into the guy's facemask. Tate didn't exactly just go forward, if that makes sense.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,943
Reaction score
6,874
Location
Goodyear
I think he intended to clear the guy from making a tackle and used leverage given that he is 4" and a whole lot of weight smaller than the LB - he drove through his chest and the first things that made contact were his shoulder and hands ..... from there it's just bracing for the contact - I'm sure he knew it was going to be a big impact - not uncommon for the hitter to also hurt themselves if they throw themselves around sloppy

also giving up a good amount of size to a guy going full steam it wouldn't really be effective if he would of just tried to stand in front of the guy - he would have been trucked
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Guy was covering tate in zone coverage and was behind tate for the play - he released to pursue wilson and got tagged in the chest because he wasn't paying attention - not paying attention doesn't make you defenseless .... being in active pursuit (in the lead position at that to make the play) and getting hit by the same guy you were just defending doesn't make you defenseless ...... it makes you stupid

tates left shoulder makes first contact with the right part of his chest

that still image is after the initial impact and taking from the opposite angle of first contact ... even in that though you see tate has his legs on the ground, is hunched at the impact, has his hands in his abdomen, a shoulder into his chest and his helmet is lower than his shoulders .... not his fault guy went crash test dummy & bobble headed onto him

brutal yes .... but it's a brutal game

next time pay attention to your surroundings and you wont get tagged like that - not every hard hit is a bad hit
Im thinking the fine he soons receives says you're wrong. Easy to say when it's not one of your best players.
 

Pariah

H.S.
Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Posts
35,345
Reaction score
18
Location
The Aventine
He was defenseless because he didn't have his head on a swivel. That's not Tate's problem.

Good hit, IMO.
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
I think he intended to clear the guy from making a tackle and used leverage given that he is 4" and a whole lot of weight smaller than the LB - he drove through his chest and the first things that made contact were his shoulder and hands ..... from there it's just bracing for the contact - I'm sure he knew it was going to be a big impact - not uncommon for the hitter to also hurt themselves if they throw themselves around sloppy

also giving up a good amount of size to a guy going full steam it wouldn't really be effective if he would of just tried to stand in front of the guy - he would have been trucked
Probably so. I think I was just turned off by that tough guy dance he did after the play.
 

crisper57

Open the Roof!
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
14,950
Reaction score
1,019
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Im thinking the fine he soons receives says you're wrong. Easy to say when it's not one of your best players.

I am real curious about the fine. Is it just me, or were fines light so far this pre/regular season? I think the NFL doesn't want to hand out fines on non-penalized plays. Otherwise, they are admitting their replacements missed dirty calls.
 

MigratingOsprey

Thank You Paul!
Joined
Jul 20, 2003
Posts
13,943
Reaction score
6,874
Location
Goodyear
Probably so. I think I was just turned off by that tough guy dance he did after the play.

I can see that - not my favorite thing in the world, especially given his penchant for not being able to stay on the field

However, it's funny listening to defensive players complain about it - then go into their sack dance, flexing, posing, etc after every play
 

Mulli

...
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Posts
52,529
Reaction score
4,603
Location
Generational
I can see that - not my favorite thing in the world, especially given his penchant for not being able to stay on the field

However, it's funny listening to defensive players complain about it - then go into their sack dance, flexing, posing, etc after every play
Truth. Is it me or did the Cardinals stop doing that as much as they used to?

:shrug:
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
Told ya!

Within 2 years suspensions for these kinds of hits will be the norm. IMO while legal its dirty!
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
556,116
Posts
5,433,475
Members
6,329
Latest member
cardinals2025
Top