Water under the bridge, but screw you Butler!

eastcoastSUN

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
1,040
Reaction score
638
Location
858 via 703
Ok, no sense on dwelling on the past, but just want to call attention to our All Pro Punter Butler. Just rewatched the last play and the snap, albeit slightly low, was definitely MANAGEABLE. Look at :36, it's a line drive coming right at Butler and he puts the ball on the ground himself! And then to finish it off, he has the audacity to tell Cat "bad snap bro... <shrug>, not my fault".

Slow Friday... at least Brandon Williams can justify his inexperience on his lousy performance. Butler can't field snaps OR punt to save his life.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

Jetstream Green

Kool Aid with a touch of vodka
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
29,524
Reaction score
16,774
Location
San Antonio, Texas
I do not know what others may think, but your dang holder should be an athlete or your backup QB in case it gets botched and you have no other option but to try and make the first down or touchdown
 

Jim Otis

Hall of Famer
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Posts
1,262
Reaction score
187
Location
Mississippi
I do not know what others may think, but your dang holder should be an athlete or your backup QB in case it gets botched and you have no other option but to try and make the first down or touchdown


Strange you should say that because in the old days it was standard that the backup QB was the holder , I never understood why they went away from that .
 

Redneck Voodoo

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Posts
2,178
Reaction score
855
Strange you should say that because in the old days it was standard that the backup QB was the holder , I never understood why they went away from that .
I remember that too, although Larry Wilson used to hold for Jim Bakken.

I don't really remember who it was before or after. Maybe Roger Wehrli?
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,526
Location
SE valley
Strange you should say that because in the old days it was standard that the backup QB was the holder , I never understood why they went away from that .
Romo lost a playoff game as the holder on a kick

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,526
Location
SE valley
Ok, no sense on dwelling on the past, but just want to call attention to our All Pro Punter Butler. Just rewatched the last play and the snap, albeit slightly low, was definitely MANAGEABLE. Look at :36, it's a line drive coming right at Butler and he puts the ball on the ground himself! And then to finish it off, he has the audacity to tell Cat "bad snap bro... <shrug>, not my fault".

Slow Friday... at least Brandon Williams can justify his inexperience on his lousy performance. Butler can't field snaps OR punt to save his life.

xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
It was a bad snap, he had to lean, that's why the ball hit the ground

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP
eastcoastSUN

eastcoastSUN

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
1,040
Reaction score
638
Location
858 via 703
Romo lost a playoff game as the holder on a kick

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Good point. Although to his credit, Romo has done plenty of overall good things for the Cowpies to warrant a bad snap (granted, it came at quite possibly the worst time in a playoff game). I can't remember the last time Butler pinned someone inside their own 10.

You must be registered for see images attach
 

TruColor

Trombonist in Roger Goodell's Wedding Rcpt.
Supporting Member
Joined
May 13, 2002
Posts
4,154
Reaction score
3,128
Location
Prescott, AZ
I remember that too, although Larry Wilson used to hold for Jim Bakken.

I don't really remember who it was before or after. Maybe Roger Wehrli?

Yep - Roger held for Bakken after Larry.
 

NashDishesDimes

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Posts
1,891
Reaction score
657
Yeah, i saw someone else mention on this board, i find it hard to believe he is one of the 32 best punters in the world. He should have been replaced this offseason.
 

unseenaz

ASFN Addict
Joined
Mar 6, 2013
Posts
7,016
Reaction score
5,983
Location
Gilbert
dude, are you kidding me? it was a terrible terrible TERRIBLE snap. butler did about as good as you can imagine with what he had to work with, but you blame him? let's blame catanzaro who, i don't know... MISSED THE KICK?
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,387
Reaction score
1,678
Location
Tucson
dude, are you kidding me? it was a terrible terrible TERRIBLE snap. butler did about as good as you can imagine with what he had to work with, but you blame him? let's blame catanzaro who, i don't know... MISSED THE KICK?

+1

Except blame the long snapper - everyone on that crew and the coaches knew he screwed up the snap, ho took responsibility for it. Butler couldn't handle it because he had to lean forward to grab a low and outside snap while on a bad ankle. He actually did a good job of setting the ball, but the timing was all eff'ed up.
 
OP
OP
eastcoastSUN

eastcoastSUN

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
1,040
Reaction score
638
Location
858 via 703
dude, are you kidding me? it was a terrible terrible TERRIBLE snap. butler did about as good as you can imagine with what he had to work with, but you blame him? let's blame catanzaro who, i don't know... MISSED THE KICK?

Hmm... I respectfully disagree... I acknowledge the snap could have been better, but take a look at the angle at which Butler gets the ball. He brings it down himself violently - with a little more control, it could have been set up better. But then you'd have to rationalize that Cat would have still made the kick with a decent snap.

My point is, Butler sucks. I took a still from the video shown below. If you were a casual observer and did not know the outcome of the game, would you come to the conclusion, judging solely from the pic below, that it was a bad snap?

You must be registered for see images attach

 

bojack

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Posts
1,134
Reaction score
516
Anyone who watches big games on Saturday throughout the season can identify a handful of punters who are better. Punter is basically the only position that does not have a drastic change between college and NFL. Our special teams has killed us in so many games regardless of win or lose you would think it would be a priority to fix that. Its not just punting but that is a big part of it. Coverage and return game is poor also. Butler and Stanton are the golden boys on this apparently. At least with Stanton they can use the excuse about it is hard to bring someone in to learn the system. A punter just needs to do one thing, get optimal field position.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,653
Reaction score
8,073
I blame Catanazaro. He needs to make that kick. No matter what happened prior, the ball was in position to be kicked through the uprights. Bad snaps/holds happen, good kickers still knock them through.
 

schutd

ASFN Addict
Joined
Oct 15, 2002
Posts
6,258
Reaction score
2,218
Location
Charleston, SC
If you were a casual observer and did not know the outcome of the game, would you come to the conclusion, judging solely from the pic below, that it was a bad snap?

You must be registered for see images attach

Because the world operates within a single frame of a 24 frames per second microcosm.....
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,387
Reaction score
1,678
Location
Tucson
Hmm... I respectfully disagree... I acknowledge the snap could have been better, but take a look at the angle at which Butler gets the ball. He brings it down himself violently - with a little more control, it could have been set up better. But then you'd have to rationalize that Cat would have still made the kick with a decent snap.

My point is, Butler sucks. I took a still from the video shown below. If you were a casual observer and did not know the outcome of the game, would you come to the conclusion, judging solely from the pic below, that it was a bad snap?

View media item 134
That is just as easy to counter - bad snap - fast ball, low and away from the kicker. Butler did a good job with it.

So you don't like Butler and you think we need a better punter. You have a lot of support on this board, but focusing on an event where he did a good job with a bad snap is pointless.
 

JeffGollin

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
20,472
Reaction score
3,056
Location
Holmdel, NJ
True, we might be overanalyzing minutae, but we, ahem...lost.

& when you lose, it doesn't hurt to ask yourself: "Why did we lose?" and "How do we avoid this in the future?"

Butler, Cannady and/or Catanzaro logically were responsible, but - given BA's emphasis on "situational football", I have to wonder out loud whether Cardinal ST's spend enough time (if any) on "botched snap" drills. Hindsight yada yada, but maybe the coaches don't place a priority on this, but it's cost us a FB game and is, therefore, worth extra attention.
 

Darkside

ASFN Addict
BANNED BY MODERATORS
Joined
May 27, 2010
Posts
8,107
Reaction score
191
Location
Tempe, AZ
True, we might be overanalyzing minutae, but we, ahem...lost.

& when you lose, it doesn't hurt to ask yourself: "Why did we lose?" and "How do we avoid this in the future?"

Butler, Cannady and/or Catanzaro logically were responsible, but - given BA's emphasis on "situational football", I have to wonder out loud whether Cardinal ST's spend enough time (if any) on "botched snap" drills. Hindsight yada yada, but maybe the coaches don't place a priority on this, but it's cost us a FB game and is, therefore, worth extra attention.

Trust me, ya'll are analyzing minutia. It was a bad snap, and a missed field goal. The lone issue isn't our long-snapper or our punter Butler. The issue is special teams. Big picture items: like all our kickoffs, kick returns, punts, punt returns, and now FG's and long-snapping. Our special teams will lose us more games. I will give Cat some leeway on his kickoffs, because with the new rules, you don't really want it deep in the endzone anyway, it's better if you kick it to about the 5, but only if your kickoff coverage teams can get there, and we can't, because we're awful on ST's.

Disagree about practicing "botched snap" drills, that's a waste of valuable time and resources. That happens so infrequently. If the special teams were coached in a professional manner in the first place this wouldn't be an issue.

Disagree about Fitz handling the holding duties, that's just ignorant. In so many ways I don't even...let's call it laziness on my part, I don't have time to explain why this idea is stupid.

Butler is fine holding. The dude snatches hikes out of the air while he's punting. He's used to the different rotation as it comes out of the long-snappers hands, which is different than a pass (if you had Fitz back there). It's fine if you don't like him as a punter, but he's got the hands to hold down a kick, and he did a good job on Sunday.

The reason this thread is minutia is because we never should have been in that situation. We have a good team. I'm more concerned with why it was even that close. And that's the responsibility of the offense and defense. They didn't do their jobs. That worries me a hell of a lot more than a missed FG on a freak snap.
 

Russ Smith

The Original Whizzinator
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
89,075
Reaction score
41,018
He's a crappy punter but that was a bad snap and it's the snappers fault.

For people blaming the kicker he had to cut his stride because of the snap that's what caused him to miss.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,084
Reaction score
3,354
Trust me, ya'll are analyzing minutia. It was a bad snap, and a missed field goal. The lone issue isn't our long-snapper or our punter Butler. The issue is special teams. Big picture items: like all our kickoffs, kick returns, punts, punt returns, and now FG's and long-snapping. Our special teams will lose us more games. I will give Cat some leeway on his kickoffs, because with the new rules, you don't really want it deep in the endzone anyway, it's better if you kick it to about the 5, but only if your kickoff coverage teams can get there, and we can't, because we're awful on ST's.

I agree our ST's are bad right now but the biggest issues this past game were Butler's poor punting and our rookie long snapper blowing it at the end of the game.

Disagree about practicing "botched snap" drills, that's a waste of valuable time and resources. That happens so infrequently. If the special teams were coached in a professional manner in the first place this wouldn't be an issue.

Completely disagree, the resources being "wasted" are the punter, kicker and long snapper. They aren't needed when the O and D are practicing so they could spend time practicing handling bad snaps better.

Disagree about Fitz handling the holding duties, that's just ignorant. In so many ways I don't even...let's call it laziness on my part, I don't have time to explain why this idea is stupid.

Fitz has fantastic hands but I agree I don't want him doing this job.

Butler is fine holding. The dude snatches hikes out of the air while he's punting. He's used to the different rotation as it comes out of the long-snappers hands, which is different than a pass (if you had Fitz back there). It's fine if you don't like him as a punter, but he's got the hands to hold down a kick, and he did a good job on Sunday.

I agree with the above. Buthead actually did a good job getting that bad snap into a kickable position.

The reason this thread is minutia is because we never should have been in that situation. We have a good team. I'm more concerned with why it was even that close. And that's the responsibility of the offense and defense. They didn't do their jobs. That worries me a hell of a lot more than a missed FG on a freak snap.

For someone who is bemoaning the lack of discussion and activity on the site I'm surprised you would be so dismissive of this one.
 

NJCardFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
14,974
Reaction score
2,968
Location
Bridgeton, NJ
Strange you should say that because in the old days it was standard that the backup QB was the holder , I never understood why they went away from that .
Because they went away from carrying 3 QB's. Now most teams only carry/suit up 2 and don't want to risk injury to the backup. That's my guess.
 
Top