kerouac9
Klowned by Keim
The cool thing about colloquialisms is that they are pretty subjective in the way they're used. So me using "beast" to describe someone, which is very common, is fine except in your eyes
So as an English teacher you should know what a colloquialism is but apparently you don't so I challenge you to reference a dictionary on that term. If you spent time correcting slang on this board along with throwing our players to the wolves, you'd be unemployed. In the grand scheme of things, it really doesn't matter. You really need to relax about this subject. I'm dead serious.
Holy smokes; "colloquialism" doesn't mean what you think it does. Of course, the word you mean is actually "metaphor." It's perfectly okay for you to say that you have no idea what waters that you've waded into.
"Beast" is a metaphor in that I understand that you do not mean that Daryl Washington, say, sits on a table at Ruth's Chris steak house and eats with his hands. He is civilized, not some horned toad-human manimal hybrid.
But the part of speech that you're using is a noun, not an adjective. You went to UofA so I know this'll be difficult to understand, but "colloquialism" is not actually a part of speech. It's a type of usage.