I was listening to ESPN radio and they interviewed CHRIS BROUSSARD (I think it was him although it was pronoucned like Bucher ??). He made a comment that struck me, that Marion wants to have nothing to do with the Celtics.
He didn't give a source and was not challenged on that point, but it is something that has not been considered. There has been some kind of implicit assumption that Marion wants to go somewhere where he can be either "the main man" or at least a bigger part of the offense. But it seems reasonable to assume that he also does not want to go to a bad team.
Does it make any difference? If Marion was simply an expiring contract, it wouldn't. But every deal assumes that whoever is making the trade wants what Marion can bring to the table and is likely to be able to re-sign for a lower amount when his contract comes up. But how much would they pay if they are sure that did not want to be on the team and would leave in two years no matter what.
The same holds for free agency in couple of years. Marion gets a choice of more money/attention on one hand versus playing for a top team. If BROUSSARD is right about the Celtics, it would suggest he may not be quite as antsy to move as some seem to think. It would also reduce his attractiveness to other teams.
At this point, Kerr needs to sit him down and make it clear that the Suns do not want to trade him, but he needs to keep his mouth shut and stop complaining. It might not be a bad idea to tell him the facts of life about his shot selection and lack of improvement in his offensive skill set.
The bottom line is that if he's not happy in Phoenix, he can be moved but he's not going to like where. If he'd rather stay, then he needs to stop complaining and work on getting better.
He didn't give a source and was not challenged on that point, but it is something that has not been considered. There has been some kind of implicit assumption that Marion wants to go somewhere where he can be either "the main man" or at least a bigger part of the offense. But it seems reasonable to assume that he also does not want to go to a bad team.
Does it make any difference? If Marion was simply an expiring contract, it wouldn't. But every deal assumes that whoever is making the trade wants what Marion can bring to the table and is likely to be able to re-sign for a lower amount when his contract comes up. But how much would they pay if they are sure that did not want to be on the team and would leave in two years no matter what.
The same holds for free agency in couple of years. Marion gets a choice of more money/attention on one hand versus playing for a top team. If BROUSSARD is right about the Celtics, it would suggest he may not be quite as antsy to move as some seem to think. It would also reduce his attractiveness to other teams.
At this point, Kerr needs to sit him down and make it clear that the Suns do not want to trade him, but he needs to keep his mouth shut and stop complaining. It might not be a bad idea to tell him the facts of life about his shot selection and lack of improvement in his offensive skill set.
The bottom line is that if he's not happy in Phoenix, he can be moved but he's not going to like where. If he'd rather stay, then he needs to stop complaining and work on getting better.
Last edited: