What was the point in making Bradford inactive?

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
7,217
Reaction score
4,130
Location
The 215
We're already seeing that some of Wilk's in game moves are dumbfounding. I'm just curious as to the thinking of putting SB behind Glennon. I don't see a lot of movement on depth charts with backups. Usually the 2nd stays the 2nd and so on. Someone please give me some clarity to this because as I see it this was a psuedo tough guy move meant to "send a message" which was in my opinion laughable and only makes him look more incompetent in light of yesterdays L.
 
OP
OP
phillycard

phillycard

ASFN Addict
Joined
Aug 22, 2003
Posts
7,217
Reaction score
4,130
Location
The 215
If he’s not starting why not save 350,000 per game... This is actually a smart move.
Understood. I did see something about Bradford losing money by not playing. Makes sense I guess.
 

Ouchie-Z-Clown

I'm better than Mulli!
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Posts
63,614
Reaction score
58,062
Location
SoCal
Understood. I did see something about Bradford losing money by not playing. Makes sense I guess.
It’s not just him losing money. I’ve seen that cards can recoup something like $4M in cap space and push it to next year. If that’s true Bradford should not dress the rest of the year. I don’t feel bad taking that $ outta his hands considering he’s still making $15M for less than three games played this year and he got to avoid injury.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,281
Reaction score
6,230
Location
Dallas, TX
Should’ve just cut him just like I said after the team was turned over to the kid last week!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
553,933
Posts
5,412,709
Members
6,319
Latest member
route66
Top