What's the deal with DJ Humphries?

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
The first round should not be for developmental players learning the position and their "spot."

I look at it as a good thing that he's not yet good enough to play. That means we have a pretty good set of tackles. I suspect if the Cards were not very good this year that he'd be in there taking his lumps, along with the QB.
 

Finito

ASFN Icon
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Posts
21,060
Reaction score
13,827
It's not a concern. I know this might be hard for Cardinal fans to understand cause were just not used to it but we are really deep at offensive tackle. We have two very legit guys and Watford proved more than capable of stepping in if needed.

It's a good problem to have
 

AZfaninMN

ASFN Addict
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
8,082
Reaction score
6,492
Location
Minnesota
It's not a concern. I know this might be hard for Cardinal fans to understand cause were just not used to it but we are really deep at offensive tackle. We have two very legit guys and Watford proved more than capable of stepping in if needed.

It's a good problem to have

I agree and if he is activated it would take a player like golden off of ST and we would have 10 active offensive lineman when the most we play is 6 at one time? Let him develop and next year he could be a starter or he gets beat out by Watford.
 

Cardiac

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jul 21, 2002
Posts
12,062
Reaction score
3,329
You've seen that potential?

I'm not a scout nor did I attend any of TC or practices. What I do know is that BASK have this belief and that's why they drafted him.

Positions of importance are:

QB, far and away the most important.
LT, to protect the most valuable player.

Some debate about CB and pass rusher, they are 3 and 4 on the list.

I get the concern because of the nickname he earned but he wasn't drafted to play this year. If could have beaten out Massie and Watford then awesome but he was needed to start.
 

Harry

ASFN Consultant and Senior Writer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Posts
11,799
Reaction score
25,770
Location
Orlando, FL
As some of you know I'm based in Florida and have good access to info. I posted on draft day that the word out of Gainesville was Humphries was very immature and had a questionable work ethic. Some also questioned whether he really enjoyed the game. Those of you who've followed me through the years know that I think you can get good value by taking a shot at late maturing players. However, I don't like that strategy in the first 2 rounds. It is accurate to say Humphries has outstanding athletic ability for a player his size. I just think it's too big of a risk.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
eastcoastSUN

eastcoastSUN

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Posts
1,040
Reaction score
638
Location
858 via 703
I look at it as a good thing that he's not yet good enough to play. That means we have a pretty good set of tackles. I suspect if the Cards were not very good this year that he'd be in there taking his lumps, along with the QB.

You make some good points... My main argument is just the position (1st rd) he was taken in and the glaring holes we have on D this year. My mindset is that we are SO close this year and it can literally be the difference of a deep playoff run or not. My exasperation mainly comes from our LBs unable to contain their gaps - Krapernick running for that TD where Minter was five steps behind him... the bubble screens by the Saints and Gurley slashing us all over the field last week.

It's remarkable how Keim can hit homeruns in the middle to late rounds in the draft and completely whiff 1st/2nd rounders (D Buc notwithstading).
 

NashDishesDimes

Hall of Famer
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Posts
1,872
Reaction score
627
I think the frustration stems more from the idea that they took a player that wasnt a huge position of need. When you do that, you typically expect the player to show something and be worth at least where the Cards picked him, hence the BPA idea.

Although i agree with most that it is rediculous to judge 4 games in, but there were reports early on that he wasnt trying and BA called him out, that is obviously not a good sign.

Could have taken someone to shore up the LBers, Cards wont be able to pay all these linemen long-term anyways.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
As some of you know I'm based in Florida and have good access to info. I posted on draft day that the word out of Gainesville was Humphries was very immature and had a questionable work ethic. Some also questioned whether he really enjoyed the game. Those of you who've followed me through the years know that I think you can get good value by taking a shot at late maturing players. However, I don't like that strategy in the first 2 rounds. It is accurate to say Humphries has outstanding athletic ability for a player his size. I just think it's too big of a risk.

Agreed. My scout friend said almost the exact same thing in that he's immature and needs to grow up. That being said, he liked the pick and thinks he'll be a very good player.
 

Cbus cardsfan

Back to Back ASFN FFL Champion
Joined
May 14, 2002
Posts
21,463
Reaction score
7,632
You make some good points... My main argument is just the position (1st rd) he was taken in and the glaring holes we have on D this year. My mindset is that we are SO close this year and it can literally be the difference of a deep playoff run or not. My exasperation mainly comes from our LBs unable to contain their gaps - Krapernick running for that TD where Minter was five steps behind him... the bubble screens by the Saints and Gurley slashing us all over the field last week.

It's remarkable how Keim can hit homeruns in the middle to late rounds in the draft and completely whiff 1st/2nd rounders (D Buc notwithstading).

Believe me, I badly wanted a rush end on defense over Humphries but him being inactive is completely irrelevant at this point in his career given the Cards current roster.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,017
Reaction score
23,172
You make some good points... My main argument is just the position (1st rd) he was taken in and the glaring holes we have on D this year. My mindset is that we are SO close this year and it can literally be the difference of a deep playoff run or not. My exasperation mainly comes from our LBs unable to contain their gaps - Krapernick running for that TD where Minter was five steps behind him... the bubble screens by the Saints and Gurley slashing us all over the field last week.

It's remarkable how Keim can hit homeruns in the middle to late rounds in the draft and completely whiff 1st/2nd rounders (D Buc notwithstading).

This right here 100%.
 

Mainstreet

Cruisin' Mainstreet
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2003
Posts
117,859
Reaction score
58,040
You make some good points... My main argument is just the position (1st rd) he was taken in and the glaring holes we have on D this year. My mindset is that we are SO close this year and it can literally be the difference of a deep playoff run or not. My exasperation mainly comes from our LBs unable to contain their gaps - Krapernick running for that TD where Minter was five steps behind him... the bubble screens by the Saints and Gurley slashing us all over the field last week.

It's remarkable how Keim can hit homeruns in the middle to late rounds in the draft and completely whiff 1st/2nd rounders (D Buc notwithstading).

You make a good argument (except for certain outstanding players) to trade down in the draft. The more players the better with the Cardinals scouting. Sometimes I think in the first and sometimes second rounds GMs feel compelled to draft certain players based upon national hype for fear of making a mistake.
 

MrYeahBut

4 Food groups: beans, chili, cheese, bacon
Supporting Member
Joined
May 20, 2002
Posts
17,853
Reaction score
13,465
Location
Albq
You make a good argument (except for certain outstanding players) to trade down in the draft. The more players the better with the Cardinals scouting. Sometimes I think in the first and sometimes second rounds GMs feel compelled to draft certain players based upon national hype for fear of making a mistake.



IMO, if you operate from a position of fear, you're setting yourself up to fail to begin with. I don't think that's how the front office does business now.

.
 

pinetopred

Registered
Joined
May 17, 2002
Posts
756
Reaction score
215
This is why gms lose jobs they take risks based on potential makes them look like a genius or a moron based on what a 21 23 yr old kid does. I would hate to have a job where a 21 or 22 yr old kid can make or break you
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,283
Reaction score
40,297
Location
Colorado
To me, it is Jonathan Cooper all over again, but instead of a guy who was billed as a day one starter, we got a guy who was billed as a day one project.

Anyone who watched Humphries in college knows what type of athletic ability he has. It is just going to be up to him to maximize that talent. Maybe a year as a healthy scratch for a guy who has always been able to get bye on athletic talent will be the motivation that he needs. The Cardinals have a good locker room which could help push things that way.

What I do know is that I am happier to draft a guy like this when we have other options on the roster rather than drafting a guy like this with no other options.
 

vince56

ASFN Addict
Joined
Sep 15, 2002
Posts
9,081
Reaction score
2,305
Location
Arizona
To me, it is Jonathan Cooper all over again, but instead of a guy who was billed as a day one starter, we got a guy who was billed as a day one project.

I disagree, its completely different. Cooper was dominant in his first training camp, then injury hit. He wasn't himself last year b/c he wasn't 100%. Now he's back and playing very well. I still don't like taking a guard in the top 15, but I am happy with the pick considering how he's playing.

Humphries looked lost and was manhandled in the preseason. He needs to come down to earth and play the game.
 

Timm Rosenbach

Bye Bye DJ
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Posts
6,525
Reaction score
4,478
Location
Tucson
It's not a concern. I know this might be hard for Cardinal fans to understand cause were just not used to it but we are really deep at offensive tackle. We have two very legit guys and Watford proved more than capable of stepping in if needed.

It's a good problem to have

This is a great problem to have. No pressure up the middle, Sean Weatherspoon wasting a roster spot, questionable play at corner. But our offensive line is so "good" that or 1st rounder can't see the field
 

WildBB

Yogi n da Bear
Joined
Mar 20, 2004
Posts
14,295
Reaction score
1,239
Location
The Sonoran Jungle - West
I see no problems, Goodwin demands precision, good technique and good communication - Humphries is raw and they stated they he would likely not play this year unless he can beat out a vet.

All these articles about how OLinemen coming out in the last decade take longer to transition to the pro game, and we are crying about our last OT when Watford and Massie are playing decent.

Yeah, he's basically an insurance policy for this year and starter material after he grows up some.

Don't know if they're gonna spend $$ on Massie in the off season either.

They'll have a couple of options now next year. In the draft as well, since you don't need to take a T,.
 
Top