Who would be your choice or choices for head coach next...

SissyBoyFloyd

Pawnee, Skidi Clan
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Posts
5,077
Reaction score
2,384
Location
Mesa, AZ
Hire someone young with modern ideas and a more recent relationship with colleges and college age kids. Someone inventive, who is a free thinker, way outside the NFL mindset.
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
Jim Harbaugh would be my #1 choice and number 2 and 3

if not Jim I'd like to see the Cards interview Pat Patricia from NE
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
3) Mike Vrabel-at some point he's going to be the guy somewhere. Knows the game & learned from the master in BB.

4) Matt Patricia-learned from one of the best in BB. DC of some very solid defenses despite limited talent though they've had a dropoff early this season

if not Jim I'd like to see the Cards interview Pat Patricia from NE


I seen these two brought up a couple times.

Belichek is know for his defense, I get it. But, the Patriots defense is less than impressive this year, and one could debate last year.

Futhermore, I get it with the whole Matt Patricia thing, he is a guy that used to be a salesman, and was given a rare opportunity to pass over putting his time in as a coach and has worked his way to becoming a defensive coordinator for New England. I think that if the Cardinals chose this guy as a head coach it would be like how this organization likes to go small school in drafts, and be too cute with their moves. Being part of the system in New England is one thing, but having to stand up by himself with his background and get men to play for him is another. I think Patricia is a very poor choice. But, that is just my very humble opinion.

If you want to take from New England (which RARELY works by the way), then I would go with an offensive mind, Josh McDaniels is the known name but his tenure as a head coach was pretty poor.

Not to mention, you have to have the personnel.

With all due respect to the New England organization that has been a Super Bowl contender every year for almost two decades, what would they be without Tom Brady ?

That is the question, because without Brady is the defense coached in a way that would really merit head coaching interest ? Same goes for the offense.

The coach would come into a situation here at Arizona where the cupboard is bare, no quarterback let alone Tom Brady, and a defense that is more hype than production.

Again, I am not saying it is horrible decision to pick a person from New England (well, maybe in the case of Patricia), but the coaches named are not coaches I would see as head coach material, IMHO, for the reasons above.

Then the question is who ? Making matter worse for this post, I do not know.

Every time I think about head coaching in the NFL circa 2017, I just see what pro-style NFL football was dying off, and what you see in the college game taking over. Which goes against a lot of what I believe in football philosophically.

Just look at some of my comments in regards to Chip Kelly no less than 2 years ago. At this point Kelly may just be a guy before his time, and not the passing fad I had him for.

Again, I do not know.
 
Last edited:

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,443
Reaction score
16,679
Location
Modesto, California
I seen these two brought up a couple times.

Belichek is know for his defense, I get it. But, the Patriots defense is less than impressive this year, and one could debate last year.

If you want to take from New England (which RARELY works by the way), then I would go with an offensive mind, Josh McDaniels is the known name but his tenure as a head coach was pretty poor.

Not to mention, you have to have the personnel.

With all due respect to the New England organization that has been a Super Bowl contender every year for almost two decades, what would they be without Tom Brady ?

That is the question, because without Brady is the defense coached in a way that would really merit head coaching interest ? Same goes for the offense.

The coach would come into a situation here at Arizona where the cupboard is bare, no quarterback let alone Tom Brady, and a defense that is more hype than production.

Again, I am not saying it is horrible decision to pick a person from New England, but the coaches named are not coaches I would see as head coach material, IMHO, for the reasons above.
Vrabel coaches in Houston....and has had some success. His defense is not top 10 right now but they are solid and have had their own issues to deal with. Part of the reason I like Vrabel is because he left NE and still shows signs of being successful... so far that hasnt really happened with anyone else that I am aware of.
 

b8rtm8nn

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Posts
3,372
Reaction score
1,648
Location
Tucson
Bruce Arians with a new defensive coordinator with a record of success and a new special teams coordinator with a record of success (sort of like how Andy Reid fills his positions).
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,256
Reaction score
23,762
Hire someone young with modern ideas and a more recent relationship with colleges and college age kids. Someone inventive, who is a free thinker, way outside the NFL mindset.
James Franklin?
Mike Norvell?
 

PACardsFan

ASFN Icon
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
10,266
Reaction score
12,290
Location
York, PA
I do like Jim Harbaugh, because he’s a proven winner. But rest assure, he’s not leaving Michigan any time soon. This was ALWAYS going to be a rebuilding year for MI, as Harbaugh had to replace 10 of 11 defensive starters from last year. And that’s his bread & butter.

I still prefer an offensive minded HC, so I would go after Josh McDaniels. He’s learned under the best HC ever & has been part of all 5 of the Patriot’s SB wins.
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
Vrabel coaches in Houston....and has had some success. His defense is not top 10 right now but they are solid and have had their own issues to deal with. Part of the reason I like Vrabel is because he left NE and still shows signs of being successful... so far that hasnt really happened with anyone else that I am aware of.


Really? Wow, shows how well I have followed coaches. :billthecat:


Houston has had A LOT of injuries on their defense, and huge injuries. JJ Watt, Brian Cushing (suspension), and Mercilius Whitney, so it is no cake walk in Houston.

Only problem is, like you stated, Houston is the 30th defense in the league when it comes to points allowed per game, Cardinals give up 27.3 pts/game, and the Texans give up 26.9.

Finding the perfect coach feels like a unicorn hunt. I REALLY wanted Mike McCoy last time around......he didn't turn out so well.
 

ARZCardinals

ASFN Lifer
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Posts
4,151
Reaction score
699
Location
Behind you
I seen these two brought up a couple times.

Belichek is know for his defense, I get it. But, the Patriots defense is less than impressive this year, and one could debate last year.

Futhermore, I get it with the whole Matt Patricia thing, he is a guy that used to be a salesman, and was given a rare opportunity to pass over putting his time in as a coach and has worked his way to becoming a defensive coordinator for New England. I think that if the Cardinals chose this guy as a head coach it would be like how this organization likes to go small school in drafts, and be too cute with their moves. Being part of the system in New England is one thing, but having to stand up by himself with his background and get men to play for him is another. I think Patricia is a very poor choice. But, that is just my very humble opinion.

If you want to take from New England (which RARELY works by the way), then I would go with an offensive mind, Josh McDaniels is the known name but his tenure as a head coach was pretty poor.

Not to mention, you have to have the personnel.

With all due respect to the New England organization that has been a Super Bowl contender every year for almost two decades, what would they be without Tom Brady ?

That is the question, because without Brady is the defense coached in a way that would really merit head coaching interest ? Same goes for the offense.

The coach would come into a situation here at Arizona where the cupboard is bare, no quarterback let alone Tom Brady, and a defense that is more hype than production.

Again, I am not saying it is horrible decision to pick a person from New England (well, maybe in the case of Patricia), but the coaches named are not coaches I would see as head coach material, IMHO, for the reasons above.

Then the question is who ? Making matter worse for this post, I do not know.

Every time I think about head coaching in the NFL circa 2017, I just see what pro-style NFL football was dying off, and what you see in the college game taking over. Which goes against a lot of what I believe in football philosophically.

Just look at some of my comments in regards to Chip Kelly no less than 2 years ago. At this point Kelly may just be a guy before his time, and not the passing fad I had him for.

Again, I do not know.

Good write up

I think many like the coaching staff of NE because they know the winning formula. It's like making food....if someone has a great recipe and you follow the exact process precise to the orig. you are now considered a great cook.

They know the formula the best. The system is tried and true.

While Jim H is my 1st pick...and I'd sell the farm to get him...as I know he'd rebuild the farm and get us another 2 farms...

I could live with Pat P.
 

oaken1

Stone Cold
Supporting Member
Banned from P+R
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Posts
18,443
Reaction score
16,679
Location
Modesto, California
Good write up

I think many like the coaching staff of NE because they know the winning formula. It's like making food....if someone has a great recipe and you follow the exact process precise to the orig. you are now considered a great cook.

They know the formula the best. The system is tried and true.

While Jim H is my 1st pick...and I'd sell the farm to get him...as I know he'd rebuild the farm and get us another 2 farms...

I could live with Pat P.
everyone keeps calling him Pat............pretty sure his name is Matt Patricia....M
 

RugbyMuffin

ASFN IDOL
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Posts
30,485
Reaction score
4,877
It's like making food....if someone has a great recipe and you follow the exact process precise to the orig. you are now considered a great cook.

Can't argue that.

I am an engineer. My mother is a RIDICULOUSLY good cook.

I make good food now, not because I am a good cook but because I make a good mocking bird.

That said, if something goes wrong with the recipe ? My mother would know what to do about, while I would be screwed.

Not sure if that applies to your extremely good example, but just throwing that in there.
 

Ronin

In yo city!
Super Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Posts
145,774
Reaction score
67,521
Location
Crowley, TX
xc_hide_links_from_guests_guests_error_hide_media
 

BigRedRage

Reckless
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Posts
48,274
Reaction score
12,525
Location
SE valley
if I were to choose offensive guy vs defensive, I would go defensive with a smash mouth, run first style offense to build around DJ.
 

slanidrac16

ASFN Icon
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2002
Posts
15,836
Reaction score
16,432
Location
Plainfield, Il.
I would go with Frank Reich. Look what he has done with Carson Wentz. Let's face it . We are going to have a new young QB and I think it would be huge to have a new coach that is QB friendly and good with a young QB. In addition to that we need to hire the BEST defensive coordinator available.

I was thinking Josh McDaniels but he has had the benefit of having Tom Brady.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,755
Reaction score
41,753
Location
Colorado
Pat Shurmur
Josh McDaniels
Todd Haley

all are worth a serious look.

Shaw
Harbaugh

are pipe dreams IMO. I don't believe they would leave their current situations for ours.

Mike Vrabel is the former defensive NE coach who I would look at. Matt Patricia is meh. His anti Goodell gear last year turned me off.

I personally don't love the defensive head coach route with how it leads to turnover on the offensive coaching side.
 

DVontel

ASFN Icon
Joined
Jan 28, 2015
Posts
13,256
Reaction score
23,762
Pat Shurmur
Josh McDaniels
Todd Haley

all are worth a serious look.

Shaw
Harbaugh

are pipe dreams IMO. I don't believe they would leave their current situations for ours.

Mike Vrabel is the former defensive NE coach who I would look at. Matt Patricia is meh. His anti Goodell gear last year turned me off.

I personally don't love the defensive head coach route with how it leads to turnover on the offensive coaching side.
I’ll stay the hell away from Haley. I really do have a bad feeling of him becoming a HC again.
 

Chopper0080

2021 - Prove It
Joined
May 15, 2002
Posts
28,755
Reaction score
41,753
Location
Colorado
I’ll stay the hell away from Haley. I really do have a bad feeling of him becoming a HC again.
Haley failed for a reason, but he warrants a serious look to see if something has changed. Chip Kelly is similar in that way. You know why his stint failed. Gotta talk to him to see if anything is different.
 

Buckybird

Hoist the Lombardi Trophy
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Posts
25,296
Reaction score
6,310
Location
Dallas, TX
I’ll stay the hell away from Haley. I really do have a bad feeling of him becoming a HC again.
Like the Pats failed hiring Bellicheat away from the Jets? Lol

Haley is a damn good offensive mind & brings the tough approach the Cards sorely lack IMO. He may or may not work out, but several coaches learn from their past HC failures. He's my #2 candidate after David Shaw
 
Top