LoyaltyisaCurse
IF AND WHEN HEALTHY...
lol! At the thought of the Cards letting Warner walk to the 9ers only to give him an All-Pro wideout to make them a contender. I guess the Cards should just hand them a division title?
So in a thread where someone claims the 49ers' line is so horrendously bad that Warner will literally die on the field you find the remote, yet possible hypothetical of Boldin being traded to SF to be the inconceivable statement? Pennington went to the Dolphins. Curtis Martin went from the Patriots to the Jets. Bruce went from the Rams to the 49ers. Division trades happen all the time. Familiarity and all that. Not to mention Boldin has demanded a trade and said he won't play for Arizona, the 49ers are in real need of a WR and have the cap space/draft picks to make a deal. I don't think it will happen but please take these things in the spirit that they're offered. The whole point was based on the remote chance of Warner going to SF.
Good for you. What's your point? I never said their receiving corps was better or even preferable to the Cardinals. Only that the Cardinals receivers aren't know for their ability to seperate from coverage. If anything it's the contrary.
I'll bet you 10 grand that it's possible.Oh, and on your continued insistence that Q might be traded to the 9ers. I bet you 1 grand right now, real money, that it won't happen. Deal?
I'll bet you 10 grand that it's possible.
I didn't say anything about sacks. We were talking about whether or not Warner might stay healthy in SF and regardless of the sack numbers, Warner has taken a ton of hits behind the Card's o-line. I don't think he would take any more hits if he was in SF. More sacks perhaps but not more hits.
Warner got hit more than anyone else in the league last year. If SF throws the ball less then it stands to reason that he won't be absorbing as many hits. For the past two years, Warner has been at the top of the "QB hits" list provided by footballoutsiders.com.They threw less passes and had more sacks but he will get hit less in SF than with the Cardinals. Is that your arguement?
If they throw it 100 times less over the course of the year like they did this year and he gets rid of the ball as quickly as he has been with the Cardinals then I don't see why not.So you are really asking us to believe that Warner will get sacked more in SF but get hit less. Your saying he will hardly ever get hit in SF except when he gets sacked.
As are your efforts at refusing to consider what I've said.The contortions you have to go through to further your arguement are simply astounding.
Rugby, I always enjoy your posts and your common sense behind them.
I nominate you and Mitch for new GM of the Cards after Graves is fired.
If it was only Kurt, maybe-maybe not.Think the Cards will get grilled nationally and locally by the media if Kurt gets away or decides to retire over money? I'm on the fence either way, but the perception in the media and future players could get ugly!!!
If it was only Kurt, maybe-maybe not.
But viewed within a broader context: We lost Haley and Carthon. We fired Pendergast. We lost Antonio Smith. We may lose JJ Arrington. We're not expected to keep Edge. Anquan Boldin remains cranky.
To then lose Warner would certainly mean the Cards would be grilled nationally and locally. But even worse, they'd go back to being ignored by both media and the national fan base (i.e. just another lower-tier NFL team bundled with the Lions, Rams etc.)
...yet possible hypothetical of Boldin being traded to SF to be the inconceivable statement? Pennington went to the Dolphins. Curtis Martin went from the Patriots to the Jets. Bruce went from the Rams to the 49ers. Division trades happen all the time.