JeffGollin
ASFN Icon
I think there's considerable separation between DeCastro and Massie - not so much in their upsides but in terms of which guy has less risk and is more plug'n play.DeCastro was VERY highly rated. Massie was rated high, but nowhere near that high. DeCastro fell far for himself, as did Massie. Yet there's no question about DeCastro and all of a sudden, plenty about Massie. If PITT took Massie, there would be none, just a "why didn't we get him?" for a question. Maybe it's the Cards curse, but it seems we can't be happy when a great player falls to us out of position and we have to question it, but I just don't get it... be happy, I am...
No knock,on Massie, but DeCastro appears more fail safe. Massie will just have more to prove.
Last edited: