Cheesewater
(ex-Uriah Heep)
Give me a break, so every time an employee breaks a rule the boss is in on it? So if someone at your work is stealing money, his boss was in on it as well?
No. Where did I say that? Where do you get "every time" from my post?
What Donaghy did was stupid and he got caught for it. How was Stern supposed to know the guy was placing bets? Was he in on that too?
Donaghy didn't act alone. I'm telling you that it is not out of the realm of possibility that Stern told the right person which teams and individuals should win that year, and that guy found the right officials to help. Ones who are already corrupt or have shown the propensity for corruption. It doesn't even have to be that nefarious.
Call me nieve if it makes you feel better, but you're the one inventing phantom conspiracies based on nothing more then the fact that the Phoenix Suns haven't won a championship. It's the same thing every time with some of you people, everything is a conspiracy and you take anything you can find to try and prove it.
It has nothing to do with me being a Suns fan. I have seen many other teams, not just the Suns, get the short end of the fishy stick.
Donaghy broke the rules and he broke the law, he went to jail. That type of thing happens all the time, but they don't blame the CEO of the company.
Have you been paying attention to the news lately? It's the CEO's that are the criminals.
It was more pronounced with Donaghy because he was in a position that drew media interest, but to blame Stern for it and using that to prove your silly conspiracy theory is ridiculous and you know it. If I decide to steal from my company, they're going to throw ME in jail, my boss isn't going to get fired for it and it doesn't prove any misconduct on his part. I'm sure there will be harsher regulations on NBA refs now, but the incident with a ref placing bets hardly does anything to prove that Stern is manipulating outcomes of games. Nice try.
The world is a much more complicated place than you think. If you can't see the deeper possibilities in a given situation, backed by independent observation, you ARE naive.